Advertisement

Human Modeling for Biomechanical Analysis of Closed Kinetic Chain Exercises of the Leg

  • Christian G. Chicoma
  • Fabricio G. Canales
  • Jose G. Garcia
  • Marco Morales
  • Dante A. EliasEmail author
  • Elizabeth R. Villota
Conference paper
Part of the Mechanisms and Machine Science book series (Mechan. Machine Science, volume 71)

Abstract

This paper presents the development and validation of a tridimensional 7-DOF human body model for the representation and study of closed kinetic chain exercises (CKCE) performed with the feet fixed in space, i.e. low posture exercises. The biomechanical model, a link-segment model, is based on an Euler-Lagrange formulation and employs a generalized joint coordinate system. A top-down mechanical analysis provides an estimation of the internal joint moments, along with the vertical ground reaction forces, using kinematical data collected by inertial sensors. The model is validated by correlating estimated ground reaction forces to kinetic experimental data from force plates. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated for four CKCE types (150 trials in total). In all cases, a median correlation \(r>0.90\) was found, hence proving that the proposed model is quite satisfactory for CKCE movement representation and analysis. Volleyball serve reception in low posture, a type of CKCE, is also analyzed using the results of the model.

Keywords

CKCE Body model Experimental validation Biomechanical analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by a project grant from Research Circle - PUCP ID297 - FONDECYT 206-2015.

References

  1. 1.
    Bernard, T.M., et al.: Evaluation of a biomechanical simulation model for sagittal plane lifting. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 24, 157–171 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    De Looze, M.P., et al.: Validation of a dynamic linked segment model to calculate joint moments in lifting. Clin. Biomech. 7(3), 161–169 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dumas, R., et al.: Adjustments to McConville et al. and Young et al. body segment inertial parameters. J. Biomech. 40(3), 543–553 (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Escamilla, R.F., et al.: Biomechanics of the knee during closed kinetic chain and open kinetic chain exercises. Med. Sci. Sports Exercise 30(4), 556–569 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Escamilla, R.F.: Knee biomechanics of the dynamic squat exercise. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 33, 127–141 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Farris, D.J., et al.: Deconstructing the power resistance relationship for squats: a joint-level analysis. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 26, 774–781 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gray, G.W.: Chain Reaction: Successful Strategies for Closed Chain Testing and Rehabilitation. Wynn Marketing, lnc., pp. 13–5 (1989)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hoffman, J.R., et al.: Comparison of loaded and unloaded jump squat training on strength/power performance in college football players. J. Strength Cond. Res. 7(4), 810–815 (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Isear Jr., J.A., et al.: EMG analysis of lower extremity muscle recruitment patterns during an unloaded squat. Med. Sci. Sports Exercise 29(4), 532–539 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kingma, I., et al.: Segment inertial parameter evaluation in two anthropometric models by application of a dynamic linked segment model. J. Biomech. 29, 693–704 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kritz, M., et al.: The bodyweight squat: a movement screen for the squat pattern. Strength Cond. J. 31, 76–85 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lee, J.L., et al.: The kinematics of the lower leg in the sagittal plane during downward squatting in persons with pronated feet. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 27(1), 285–287 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Plamondon, A., et al.: Validation of two 3-D segment models to calculate the net reaction forces and moments at the L5/S1 joint in lifting. Clin. Biomech. 11, 101–110 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Smidt, G.L.: Current open and closed kinetic chain conceptsclarifying or confusing? J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 20(5), 235–235 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stroe, I., Staicu, S.: Calculus of joint forces using Lagrange equations and principle of virtual work. Proc. Romanian Acad. Ser. A 11(3), 253–260 (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christian G. Chicoma
    • 1
  • Fabricio G. Canales
    • 1
  • Jose G. Garcia
    • 1
  • Marco Morales
    • 1
  • Dante A. Elias
    • 1
    Email author
  • Elizabeth R. Villota
    • 1
  1. 1.Pontificia Universidad Catolica del PeruLima 32Peru

Personalised recommendations