Advertisement

The Value of Decompressive Craniectomy in Traumatic Brain Injury

  • Angelos G. KoliasEmail author
  • Athanasios Paschalis
  • Kostas N. Fountas
  • Peter J. Hutchinson
Chapter

Abstract

Intracranial hypertension and brain swelling are well recognised secondary insults following traumatic brain injury (TBI), which are associated with increased mortality and worse outcomes. Decompressive craniectomy refers to the practice of removing a large bone flap and opening the underlying dura. By “opening the box”, the intracranial pressure is lowered and the risk of herniation can be avoided, although not completely eliminated. This chapter aims to critically appraise the existing evidence base in order to define the role of decompressive craniectomy following TBI.

Keywords

Neurosurgery Neurotrauma Decompression Cranioplasty 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Angelos Kolias and Peter Hutchinson are supported by the NIHR Global Health Research Group on Neurotrauma, which was commissioned by the NIHR using Official Development Assistance (ODA) funding (project 16/137/105). The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, National Institute for Health Research or the Department of Health.

Conflicts of Interest

Angelos Kolias and Peter Hutchinson were involved as investigators with the RESCUEicp trial. All authors are involved as investigators with the RESCUE-ASDH trial.

References

  1. 1.
    Sackett DL, Rosenberg WMC, Gray JAM, et al. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ. 1996;312:71–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dewan MC, Rattani A, Gupta S, et al. Estimating the global incidence of traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg. 2018;1:1–18.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stocchetti N, Maas AIR. Traumatic intracranial hypertension. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:972.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cushing HI. Subtemporal decompressive operations for the intracranial complications associated with bursting fractures of the skull. Ann Surg. 1908;47:641–644.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kolias AG, Kirkpatrick PJ, Hutchinson PJ. Decompressive craniectomy: past, present and future. Nat Rev Neurol. 2013;9:405–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sahuquillo J, Arikan F. Decompressive craniectomy for the treatment of refractory high intracranial pressure in traumatic brain injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;25(1):CD003983.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kramer AH, Deis N, Ruddell S, et al. Decompressive craniectomy in patients with traumatic brain injury: are the usual indications congruent with those evaluated in clinical trials? Neurocrit Care. 2016;25(1):10–9.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-015-0232-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. PRISMA group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Taylor A, Butt W, Rosenfeld J, et al. A randomized trial of very early decompressive craniectomy in children with traumatic brain injury and sustained intracranial hypertension. Childs Nerv Syst. 2001;17:154–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jiang J-Y, Xu W, Li W-P, et al. Efficacy of standard trauma craniectomy for refractory intracranial hypertension with severe traumatic brain injury: a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled study. J Neurotrauma. 2005;22:623–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Qiu W, Guo C, Shen H, et al. Effects of unilateral decompressive craniectomy on patients with unilateral acute post-traumatic brain swelling after severe traumatic brain injury. Crit Care. 2009;13:R185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cooper DJ, Rosenfeld JV, Murray L, et al. Decompressive craniectomy in diffuse traumatic brain injury. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1493–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hutchinson PJ, Kolias AG, Timofeev IS, et al. Trial of decompressive craniectomy for traumatic intracranial hypertension. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1119–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Snowdon C, Elbourne D, Garcia J. Zelen randomization: attitudes of parents participating in a neonatal clinical trial. Control Clin Trials. 1999;20:149–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wagner S, Schnippering H, Aschoff A, Koziol JA, Schwab S, Steiner T. Suboptimum hemicraniectomy as a cause of additional cerebral lesions in patients with malignant infarction of the middle cerebral artery. J Neurosurg. 2001;94:693–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dechartres A, Trinquart L, Boutron I, Ravaud P. Influence of trial sample size on treatment effect estimates: meta-epidemiological study. BMJ. 2013;346:f2304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Unverzagt S, Prondzinsky R, Peinemann F. Single-center trials tend to provide larger treatment effects than multicenter trials: a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66:1271–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cooper DJ, Rosenfeld JV, Murray L, et al. Early decompressive craniectomy for patients with severe traumatic brain injury and refractory intracranial hypertension--a pilot randomized trial. J Crit Care. 2008;23:387–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sedgwick P. Randomised controlled trials: balance in baseline characteristics. BMJ. 2014;349:g5721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pretz CR, Dams-O’Connor K. Longitudinal description of the Glasgow Outcome Scale-extended for individuals in the traumatic brain injury model systems national database: a National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research traumatic brain injury model systems study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94:2486–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Timmons SD, Ullman JS, Eisenberg HM. Craniectomy in diffuse traumatic brain injury. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:373–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Appelboom G, Piazza M, Zoller SD, Connolly ES. Clinical trials in decompressive craniectomy after severe diffuse traumatic brain injury. World Neurosurg. 2013;80:e153–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Akl EA, et al. GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:383–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Menon DK, Kolias AG, Servadei F, Hutchinson PJ. Survival with disability. Whose life is it, anyway? Br J Anaesth. 2017;119:1062–3.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aex374.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kolias AG, Viaroli E, Rubiano AM, et al. The current status of decompressive craniectomy in traumatic brain injury. Curr Trauma Rep. 2018;4(4):326–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Honeybul S, Janzen C, Kruger K, Ho KM. Decompressive craniectomy for severe traumatic brain injury: is life worth living? J Neurosurg. 2013;119:1566–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Balestreri M, Czosnyka M, Hutchinson P, et al. Impact of intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure on severe disability and mortality after head injury. Neurocrit Care. 2006;4:8–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Badri S, Chen J, Barber J, et al. Mortality and long-term functional outcome associated with intracranial pressure after traumatic brain injury. Intensive Care Med. 2012;38:1800–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fletcher TL, Wirthl B, Kolias AG, Adams H, Hutchinson PJA, Sutcliffe MPF. Modelling of brain deformation after decompressive craniectomy. Ann Biomed Eng. 2016;44:3495–509.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-016-1666-7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rutgers DR, Fillard P, Paradot G, Tadié M, Lasjaunias P, Ducreux D. Diffusion tensor imaging characteristics of the corpus callosum in mild, moderate, and severe traumatic brain injury. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29:1730–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Honeybul S, Janzen C, Kruger K, Ho KM. The incidence of neurologic susceptibility to a skull defect. World Neurosurg. 2016;86:147–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Malcolm JG, Rindler RS, Chu JK, et al. Early cranioplasty is associated with greater neurological improvement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurgery. 2017;82(3):278–88.  https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyx182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hutchinson PJ, Kolias AG, Menon DK. The authors reply. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1119–30.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc1613479.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Stocchetti N, Zanaboni C, Colombo A, et al. Refractory intracranial hypertension and ‘second-tier’ therapies in traumatic brain injury. Intensive Care Med. 2008;34:461–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kolias AG, Rubiano AM, Figaji A, Servadei F, Hutchinson PJ. Traumatic brain injury: global collaboration for a global challenge. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18:136–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Angelos G. Kolias
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Athanasios Paschalis
    • 3
  • Kostas N. Fountas
    • 3
  • Peter J. Hutchinson
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical NeurosciencesAddenbrooke’s Hospital and University of CambridgeCambridgeUK
  2. 2.NIHR Global Health Research Group on Neurotrauma, University of CambridgeCambridgeUK
  3. 3.Department of NeurosurgeryUniversity Hospital of Larissa and University of ThessalyLarissaGreece

Personalised recommendations