Exploring Family-Based Intervention Mechanisms as a Form of Statecraft
This chapter is based on PhD research that explores the use of family intensive interventions that aim to change the behaviour of ‘problematic’ families. The findings indicate that the relationship dynamics between service users and agencies is more complex and nuanced than common academic critiques of governance and social control. By applying the findings to Wacquant’s extensive work on the marrying of social and penal policy, the chapter argues these nuances are not always acknowledged by Wacquant. Although, the findings are in harmony with Wacquant’s argument that punitive tools (rather than supportive mechanisms) used to influence behaviour can have profound effects on the lives of society’s most marginalised families and raises ethical implications about the onwards direction of welfare policy.
- Bate, A. (2016). The Troubled Families programme (England). London: House of Commons Library.Google Scholar
- Cameron, D. (2011). PM’s speech on the fightback after the riots. Retrieved July 12, 2017, from https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/pms-speech-on-the-fightback-after-the-riots
- Communities and Local Government. (2012). The Troubled Families programme: Financial framework for the Troubled Families programme’s payment-by-results scheme for local authorities. London: Communities and Local Government.Google Scholar
- Crossley, S. (2015). The Troubled Families programme: The perfect social policy? Crime and Justice. Retrieved from https://www.crimeandjustice.org.uk/sites/crimeandjustice.org.uk/files/The%20Troubled%20Families%20Programme,%20Nov%202015.pdf.
- Crossley, S. (2016b). The Troubled Families programme: In, for and against the state? Social Policy Review: Analysis and Debate in Social Policy, 28, 127.Google Scholar
- Department for Work and Pensions. (2017). Improving lives: Helping workless families. London: Department for Work and Pensions.Google Scholar
- Department of Communities and Local Government. (2012). Working with Troubled Families: A guide to the evidence and good practice. London: Department for Communities and Local Government.Google Scholar
- Dillane, J., Hill, M., Bannister, J., & Scott, S. (2001). Evaluation of the Dundee families project. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive/Dundee City Council/NCH Action for Children.Google Scholar
- Fletcher, D. R., & Wright, S. (2017). A hand up or a slap down? Criminalising benefit claimants in Britain via strategies of surveillance, sanctions and deterrence. Critical Social Policy, 38, 323–344. Retrieved from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0261018317726622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Flint, J. (2018). Encounters with the centaur state: Advanced urban marginality and the practices and ethics of welfare sanctions regimes. Urban Studies, 56, 249. Retrieved from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0042098017750070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hancock, L., & Mooney, G. (2012). Beyond the penal state: Advanced marginality, social policy and anti-welfarism. In P. Squires & L. Lea (Eds.), Criminalisation and advanced marginality: Critically exploring the work of Loïc Wacquant (pp. 107–128). Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
- Hayden, C., & Jenkins, C. (2014). Troubled Families’ programme in England: ‘Wicked problems’ and policy-based evidence. Policy Studies, 35(6), 631–649. Retrieved from https://rsa.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01442872.2014.971732#.XMbfY02ouAg.
- Jones, R., Matczak, A., Davis, K., & Byford, I. (2015). ‘Troubled Families’: A team around the family. In J. Davies (Ed.), Social work with Troubled Families: A critical introduction (pp. 124–158). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
- Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Mead, L. (1991). The new politics and the new poverty. Public Interest, 103, 3–20.Google Scholar
- Millie, A. (2009). Anti-social behaviour. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Murray, C. A., & Field, F. (1990). The emerging British underclass. London: IEA Health and Welfare Unit.Google Scholar
- Nixon, J., Parr, S., Hunter, C., Myers, S., Sanderson, D., & Whittle, S. (2006). Anti-social behaviour intensive family support projects: An evaluation of six pioneering projects. London: Communities and Local Government.Google Scholar
- Pawson, H., Davidson, E., Sosenko, F., Flint, J., Nixon, J., Casey, R., & Sanderson, D. (2009). Evaluation of intensive family support projects in Scotland. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.Google Scholar
- Squires, P., & Lea, J. (Eds.). (2012). Criminalisation and advanced marginality: Critically exploring the work of Loïc Wacquant. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
- Tepe-Belfrage, D., & Montgomerie, J. (2016). Broken Britain: Post-crisis austerity and the trouble with the Troubled Families programme. In J. True & A. Hozic (Eds.), Scandalous economics: Gender and the politics of financial crises (pp. 79–91). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Van Ginkel, R. (2015). Containing the urban poor–coercion or consent? Disciplining missions and civilising offensives in the Netherlands. Human Figurations, 4(1). Retrieved from https://quod.lib.umich.edu/h/humfig/11217607.0004.107/%2D%2Dcontaining-the-urban-poor-coercion-or-consent-disciplining?rgn=main;view=fulltext.
- Van Wel, F. (1992). A century of families under supervision in the Netherlands. The British Journal of Social Work, 22(2), 147–166.Google Scholar
- Wacquant, L. (2004). Body & soul: Notebooks of an apprentice boxer. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Wacquant, L. (2008a). Urban outcasts: A comparative sociology of advanced marginality. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
- Wacquant, L. (2009a). Prisons of poverty. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- Wacquant, L. (2012). The wedding of workfare and prisonfare in the 21st century: Responses to critics and commentators. In P. Squires & J. Lea (Eds.), Criminalisation and advanced marginality: Critically exploring the work of Loïc Wacquant (pp. 243–257). Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
- Wacquant, L., Eick, V., & Winkler, K. J. (2011). The wedding of workfare and prisonfare revisited. Social Justice, 38(1/2), 203–222.Google Scholar
- White, C., & Day, L. (2016). National evaluation of the Troubled Families programme: Process evaluation final report. London: Department for Communities and Local Government.Google Scholar