Ontology Driven Feedforward Risk Management
Organizations are increasingly relying on projects to support their activities. With this increase, the management of these projects is becoming critical. New methods, tools and frameworks appear in order to improve the success rate of these projects. However, being complex endeavours, projects face numerous challenges that have to be addressed with proper risk management. Various risk management frameworks have been developed in order to support project managers in their task of identifying and controlling risk. Although these frameworks are effective in reducing the impact of risk, they are slow to implement. In order to more productively address these risks, we have developed an ontology to support feedforward risk management. This ontology can be implemented in project management software to provide project managers with a multi-level approach of the risks associated with their projects. The scope and breadth of the risks identified by the software will be closely related to the project data collected in the system, reducing the need for a lengthy setup. Moreover, using data collected by the project management software, the system will be able to proactively raise management awareness towards potential upcoming issues.
KeywordsRisk management Ontology Feedforward OWL
We are grateful to the Swiss Commission for Technology and Innovation which provided partial funding for this work (grant number 19311.1 PFES-ES).
- 2.Clancy, T.: The Standish Group CHAOS Report, Project Smart (2014)Google Scholar
- 6.Raz, T., Shenhar, A.J., Dvir, D.: Risk management, project success, and technological uncertainty. RD Manag. 32(2), 101–109 (2002)Google Scholar
- 10.Hall, D.C., Hulett, D.T., Graves, R.: Universal Risk Project—Final report, PMI Risk SIG (2002)Google Scholar
- 12.Bourdeau, S., Rivard, S., Barki, H.: Evaluation du risque en gestion de projets. CIRANO Sci. Ser. 47, 3–45 (2003)Google Scholar
- 13.Guarino, N.: Formal Ontology in Information Systems: Proceedings of the First International Conference (FOIS 1998), 6–8 June 1998, Trento, Italy, vol. 46. IOS Press (1998)Google Scholar
- 14.Berners-Lee, T., Fischetti, M.: Weaving the Web: The Original Design and Ultimate Destiny of the World Wide Web by Its Inventor. DIANE Publishing Company (2001)Google Scholar
- 15.Gómez-Pérez, A., Fernández-Lopez, M., Corcho, O.: Ontological Engineering: With Examples from the Areas of Knowledge Management, Ecommerce and the Semantic Web. Springer, London (2004)Google Scholar
- 16.Bedini, I., Nguyen, B.: Automatic ontology generation: state of the art. PRiSM Laboratory, Technical report, University of Versailles (2007)Google Scholar
- 17.Asim, M.N., Wasim, M., Khan, M.U.G., Mahmood, W., Abbasi, H.M.: A survey of ontology learning techniques and applications. Database 2018(1), bay101 (2018)Google Scholar
- 18.Fernández-López, M., Gómez-Pérez, A., Juristo, N.: METHONTOLOGY: from ontological art towards ontological engineering. In: Proceedings of the Ontological Engineering AAAI-97 Spring Symposium Series, Stanford University, EEUU (1997)Google Scholar
- 21.Antoniou, G., van Harmelen, F.: Web ontology language: OWL. In: Staab, S., Studer, R. (eds.) Handbook on Ontologies, pp. 67–92. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar
- 22.Hermanson, D.R., Hermanson, H.M.: The internal control paradox: what every manager should know. Rev. Bus. 16(2), 4 (1994)Google Scholar