Advertisement

Theoretical Ideals for European Constitutional Structures and Criminal Legislation

  • Merita Kettunen
Chapter
Part of the Comparative, European and International Criminal Justice book series (CEICJ, volume 2)

Abstract

Some principles and doctrines of the ECHR regime, the subsidiarity principle, the doctrine of margin of appreciation (and proportionality analysis) and the doctrine on equivalent protection, represent heterarchical flexible constitutional structures. Heterarchical constitutional structures between the national legal systems and the ECHR regime refer to constitutional structures that create an integrated and flexible constitutional system between the contracting parties and the ECHR regime.

References

  1. Alkema EA (2000) The European Convention as a constitution and its court as a constitutional court. In: Mahoney P, Matscher F, Petzold H, Wildhaber L (eds) Protection des droits de l’homme: la perspective européenne (Protecting human rights: the European perspective – studies in memory of Rolv Ryssdal). Carl HeymannGoogle Scholar
  2. Arai-Takahashi Y (2002) The margin of appreciation doctrine and the principle of proportionality in the jurisprudence of the ECHR (Intersentia 2002)Google Scholar
  3. Asp P (2012) The substantive criminal law competence of the EU (Stiftelsen Skrifter utgivna av Juridiska fakulteten vid Stockholms universitet). JureGoogle Scholar
  4. Avbelj M (2011) Supremacy or primacy of EU law – (why) does it matter? Eur Law J 17(6)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beck U (2002) The terrorist threat: world risk society revisited. Theory Cult Soc 19(4)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bering Liisberg J (2001) Does the EU charter of fundamental rights threaten the supremacy of community law? Common Mark Law Rev 38(5)Google Scholar
  7. Brauch AJ (2005) The margin of appreciation and the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights: threat to the rule of law. Columbia J Eur Law 11Google Scholar
  8. Cooper I (2006) The watchdogs of subsidiarity: national parliaments and the logic of arguing in the EU. J Common Mark Stud 44(2):281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Craig P, de Búrca G (2015) EU law: text, cases, and materials, 6th edn. OUPGoogle Scholar
  10. Darley JM, Carlsmith KM, Robinson PH (2001) The ex ante function of the criminal law. Law Soc Rev 35(1)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. de Hert P, Wieczorek I (2012) Testing the principle of subsidiarity in EU criminal policy: the omitted exercise in the recent EU documents on principles for substantive European criminal law. New J Eur Crim Law 3(3–4)Google Scholar
  12. de Jong C (2013) The European Parliament Resolution of 22 May 2012 on a EU approach to criminal law. In: Galli F, Weyembergh A (eds) Approximation of substantive criminal law in the EU: the way forward. Editions de l’Université de BruxellesGoogle Scholar
  13. de la Rasilla del Moral I (2006) The increasingly marginal appreciation of the margin-of-appreciation doctrine. German Law J 7(6)Google Scholar
  14. Defeis E (2007–2008) Dual system of human rights: the European Union. ILSA J Int Comp Law 14(1)Google Scholar
  15. Edward D (2012) Subsidiarity as a legal concept. In: Cardonnel P, Rosas A, Wahl N (eds) Constitutionalising the EU judicial system: essays in honour of Pernilla Lindh. Hart PublishingGoogle Scholar
  16. Elholm T (2014) Legitimacy and EU criminal law regulation. In: Peršak N (ed) Legitimacy and trust in criminal law, policy and justice: norms, procedures, outcomes. AshgateGoogle Scholar
  17. Halberstam D (2012) Local, global and plural constitutionalism. In: de Búrca G, Weiler JHH (eds) The worlds of European constitutionalism. CUPGoogle Scholar
  18. Herlin-Karnell E (2007) In the wake of Pupino: Advocaten voor de Wereld and Dell’Orto. German Law J 8(12)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Herlin-Karnell E (2010) What principles drive (or should drive) European criminal law? German Law J 11(10)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Herlin-Karnell E (2012) Is the citizen driving the EU’s criminal law agenda? In: Spaventa, Shuibhne (eds) Empowerment and disempowerment of the European citizen. Hart PublishingGoogle Scholar
  21. Huomo-Kettunen M (2013) Heterarchical constitutional structures in the European legal space. Eur J Leg Stud 6(1)Google Scholar
  22. Huomo-Kettunen M (2014) EU criminal policy at a crossroads between effectiveness and traditional restraints for the use of criminal law. New J Eur Crim Law 5(3)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Husak D (2004) The criminal law as last resort. Oxf J Leg Stud 24(2)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Klip A (2016) European criminal law: an integrative approach, 3rd edn. IntersentiaGoogle Scholar
  25. Krisch N (2007) The open architechture of European human rights law, LSE law, society, and economy working papers 11/2007, London School of Economics and Political Science Law Department 15Google Scholar
  26. Krisch N (2012) The case for pluralism in the postnational law. In: de Búrca G, Weiler JHH (eds) The worlds of European constitutionalism. CUPGoogle Scholar
  27. Kumm M (2012) Rethinking constitutional authority: on the structure and limits of constitutional pluralism. In: Avbelj M, Komárek J (eds) Constitutional pluralism in the European Union and beyond. Hart PublishingGoogle Scholar
  28. Łazowski A, Wessel RA (2016) When caveats turn into locks: opinion 2/13 on accession of the European Union to the ECHR. German Law J 16(1)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lenaerts K, Van Nuffel P (2011) In: Robert B, Nathan C (eds) European Union law. Sweet & MaxwellGoogle Scholar
  30. Maduro MP (2003) Europa and the constitution: what if this is as good as it gets? In: Weiler JHH, Wind M (eds) European constitutionalism beyond the state. CUPGoogle Scholar
  31. Malathouni E (2008) Should I stay or should I go: the sunset clause as self-confidence or suicide? Maastricht J Eur Comp Law 15(1)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Maugeri AM (2013) Fundamental rights in the European legal order, both as a limit on punitive power and as a source of positive obligations to criminalise. New J Eur Crim Law 4(4)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Melander S (2008) Kriminalisointiteoria – rangaistavaksi säätämisen oikeudelliset rajoitukset. Suomalaisen lakimiesyhdistyksen julkaisujaGoogle Scholar
  34. Melander S (2010) EU-rikosoikeus. WSOYproGoogle Scholar
  35. Melander S (2013) Ultima ratio in European criminal law. Oñati Socio-Leg Ser 3(1)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Melander S (2014) Effectiveness in EU criminal law and its effects on the general part of criminal law. New J Eur Crim Law 5(3)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Miettinen S (2015) The Europeanization of criminal law: competence and its control in the Lisbon era. University of HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  38. Mowbray A (2005) The creativity of the European Court of Human Rights. Hum Rights Law Rev 5(1)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nieminen L (2004) Eurooppalaistuva valtiosääntöoikeus – Valtiosääntöistyvä Eurooppa. Suomalaisen Lakimiesyhdistyksen JulkaisujaGoogle Scholar
  40. Ouwerkerk Jannemieke W (2012) Criminalisation as a last resort: a national principle under the pressure of Europeanisation? New J Eur Crim Law 3(3–4)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Paunio E, Lindroos-Hovinheimo S (2010) Taking language seriously: an analysis of linguistic reasoning in EU law. Eur Law J 16(4)Google Scholar
  42. Peers S (2016) The EU’s accession to the ECHR: the dream becomes a nightmare. German Law J 16(1)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Peristeridou C (2015) The principle of leaglity in European criminal law. IntersentiaGoogle Scholar
  44. Preuss UK (2010) Disconnecting constitutions from statehood – is global constitutionalism a viable concept. In: Dobner P, Loughlin M (eds) The twilight of constitutionalism? OUPGoogle Scholar
  45. Rosas A, Armati L (2010) EU constitutional law: an introduction. Hart PublishingGoogle Scholar
  46. Roxin C (2006) Strafrecht Allgemeiner Teil – Band I, Grundlagen, Der Aufbau der Verbrechenslehre. Verlag C.H.BeckGoogle Scholar
  47. Satzger H (2012) International and European criminal law. C.H.BeckGoogle Scholar
  48. Scheeck L (2006) The relationship between the European courts and integration through human rights. Zeitschrift für ausländishes öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 65Google Scholar
  49. Schütze R (2009a) From dual to cooperative federalism: the changing structure of European law. OUPGoogle Scholar
  50. Schütze R (2009b) Subsidiarity after Lisbon: reinforcing the safeguards of federalism? Camb Law J 68(3)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Suominen A (2011) Perus- ja ihmisoikeusnäkökohtia Suomen kansainvälisessä yhteistyössä rikosasioissa. Defensor Legis 92(1)Google Scholar
  52. Tulkens F (2011) The paradoxical relationship between criminal law and human rights. J Int Crim Justice 9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tümay M (2008) The “margin of appreciation doctrine” developed by the case law of the European Court of Human Rights. Ankara Law Rev 5(2)Google Scholar
  54. Vervaele JAE (2013) Harmonised union policies and the harmonization of substantive criminal law. In: Galli F, Weyembergh A (eds) Approximation of substantive criminal law in the EU: the way forward. Editions de l’Universite de BruxellesGoogle Scholar
  55. Weyembergh A (2013a) Approximation of substantive criminal law: the new institutional and decision-making framework and new types of interaction between EU actors. In: Galli F, Weyembergh A (eds) Approximation of substantive criminal law in the EU: the way forward. Serge de Biolley, Editions de l’Universite de BruxellesGoogle Scholar
  56. Weyembergh A (2013b) Conclusion: the way forward. In: Galli F, Weyembergh A (eds) Approximation of substantive criminal law in the EU: the way forward. Editions de l’Universite de BruxellesGoogle Scholar
  57. Weyembergh A (2017) Consequences of Brexit for European Union criminal law. New J Eur Crim Law 8(3)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zuleeg M (2011) The advantages of the European constitution. In: von Bogdandy A, Bast J (eds) Principles of European constitutional law, 2nd edn. Hart PublishingGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland and G. Giappichelli Editore 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Merita Kettunen
    • 1
  1. 1.HelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations