Historical Analysis

  • Victor Pickard


Historical methods, ranging from research based on interview data and oral history to archival and textual materials, are important tools for understanding media policy. Historical analysis brings into focus larger and longer-term processes and patterns. It reveals power structures that elude more cursory analyses of contemporary policy debates. In doing so, a historical approach to media policy sets up status quo relationships and assumptions as constructs that should be scrutinized and perhaps contested. Such a critical analysis restores policy debates to the public arena where they can be more inclusive and open to reformist impulses. Ideally, all policy scholarship should aim to historicize its subject matter to some degree. With this in mind, this chapter takes a broad approach to historical methods, provides examples, and discusses some of the big picture objectives and questions involved with this kind of research.


  1. Baker, C. E. (2002). Media, markets, and democracy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Crawford, S. (2014). First amendment common sense. Harvard Law Review, 127, 2343–2391.Google Scholar
  3. Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks. New York, NY: International Publishers.Google Scholar
  4. McChesney, R. (2007). Communication revolution: Critical junctures and the future of media. New York, NY: The New Press.Google Scholar
  5. Meinrath, S., & Pickard, V. (2008). Transcending net neutrality: Ten steps toward an open internet. Journal of Internet Law, 12(6), 1, 12–21.Google Scholar
  6. Pickard, V. (2010). ‘Whether the giants should be slain or persuaded to be good’: Revisiting the Hutchins Commission and the role of media in a democratic society. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 27(4), 391–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Pickard, V. (2015a, March). Net neutrality: A brave new frontier? Copyright & New Media Law, 19(1), 1, 3–4.Google Scholar
  8. Pickard, V. (2015b). America’s battle for media democracy: The triumph of corporate libertarianism and the future of media reform. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Pickard, V. (2015c). Media activism from above and below: Lessons from the 1940s American reform movement. Journal of Information Policy, 5, 109–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Pickard, V. (2015d). The return of the nervous liberals: Market fundamentalism, policy failure, and recurring journalism crises. The Communication Review, 18, 82–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Pickard, V. (2017, May 5). It’s not too late to save net neutrality from a captured FCC. The Nation. Retrieved from
  12. Pickard, V., & Berman, D. (2019). After net neutrality: A new deal for the digital age. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Starr, P. (2004). Creation of the media. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Further Reading

  1. Douglas, S. (1987). Inventing American broadcasting 1899–1922. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Horwitz, R. (1989). The Irony of regulatory reform: The deregulation of American telecommunications. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. McChesney, R. (1993). Telecommunications, mass media & democracy: The battle for the control of U.S. broadcasting, 1928–1935. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Streeter, T. (1996). Selling the air: A critique of the policy of commercial broadcasting in the United States. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Victor Pickard
    • 1
  1. 1.Annenberg School for CommunicationUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations