Analyzing Policy-Making III: Digital Network Analysis

  • Sílvia Majó-Vázquez


This chapter presents a methodological approach to analyze the structure of the online news domain before and after a media policy was passed. I use tools from network science to this end and I discuss the implication of this regulation for the public sphere. Networks are simplified representations of processes, which capture basic connections among those who take part in them. Through network analysis, one can assess the underlying forces that drive those processes and their consequences. In this chapter, network analysis is applied to the study of the structure of the online news domain and its organizing principles. I leverage digital trace data to map the hyperlinks that media outlets send to each other. I build on this data and use network community detection methods to inform the policy debate around a potential European regulation on news-link activity. Links are journalistic and social devices through which news consumption can be enhanced. They potentially promote a necessary normative condition envisioned by democracy theorists: the exposure to diverse news information. European policy attempts to regulate news-linking activity online could potentially limit them and therefore, curtail their positive function. In Spain, those attempts turned to action. A recent Spanish copyright regulation imposes a tax over news-linking activity in the country. More recently, the European Parliament announced that it might steer toward the same policy course. By focusing on the Spanish case, this chapter illustrates how network science can help to inform decisions on news-link regulation. More broadly, it shows how tools borrowed from this discipline are useful for media policy research. Specially when it comes to the study of the online sphere. To this end, I assess the changes in the fragmentation of the news domain before and after the Spanish copyright regulation came into force. The results suggest the supply side of the digital news domain is more fragmented after the law was enforced. The nature of the data though does not allow to disentangle the causal mechanisms driving this change.



The research reported in this paper was partly funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness under grant CSO2013-47082-P. This work was partly conducted while the author was visiting the Annenberg School for Communication at the University of Pennsylvania.


  1. Ackland, R. (2005). Voson. Retrieved from
  2. Ackland, R., & Gibson, R. (2004). Mapping political party networks on the WWW. In Proceedings of the Australian Electronic Governance Conference. Melbourne, Australia: Centre for Public Policy, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
  3. Adamic, L. A. (2009). The social hyperlink. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM conference on hypertext and hypermedia (pp. 1–2).
  4. Adamic, L. A., & Glance, N. (2005). The political blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. election: Divided they blog. In Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on link discovery (pp. 36–43). New York, NY: ACM.Google Scholar
  5. AEDE. (2014). La Reforma de la Ley de Propiedad Intelectual. Madrid: Asociación Editores Diarios Españoles. Retrieved from
  6. Alexa Internet, I. (2014). About the Alexa traffic rankings. Retrieved July 14, 2014, from
  7. Barabási, A.-L. (2015). Network science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Berelson, B. (1952). Democratic theory and public opinion. Public Opinion Quarterly, 16(3), 313–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. BOE. (2014). Ley 21/2014, de 4 de noviembre, por la que se modifica el texto refundido de la Ley de Propiedad Intelectual, aprobado por Real Decreto Legislativo 1/1996, de 12 de abril, y la Ley 1/2000, de 7 de enero, de Enjuiciamiento Civil. Madrid. Retrieved from
  10. Borge-Holthoefer, J., & Gonzalez-Bailon, S. (2015). Scale, time, and activity patterns: Advanced methods for the analysis of online networks. In N. Fielding, R. Lee, & G. Blank (Eds.), Handbook of online research methods (second). Thousand Oaks: Sage. Retrieved from
  11. Butts, C. T. (2016). SNA. cran-r-project. Retrieved from
  12. Clauset, A., Tucker, E., & Sainz, M. (2016). The colorado index of complex networks. Retrieved July 20, 2018, from
  13. Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of believe system in mass public. In D. Apter (Ed.), Ideology and discontent. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  14. Csárdi, G. (2017). Igraph: Network analysis and visualitzation. cran-r-project. Retrieved from
  15. (2017, March 24). Concordia digital. El País. Retrieved from
  16. European Commission. (2016). Directive of the European Parliament and of the council on copyright in the digital single market. Brussels. Retrieved from
  17. Froman, M. B. G. (2016). The 2016 national trade estimate report on foreign trade barriers. Washington, DC. Retrieved from
  18. Google. (2014). Google Noticias España. Retrieved February 1, 2014, from
  19. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (2009). Democracy and disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Habermas, J. (1994). Three normative models of democracy. Constellations, 1(1), 1–10. Scholar
  22. Höppner, T., Kretschmer, M., & Xalabarder, R. (2017). CREATe public lectures on the proposed EU right for press publishers. European Intellectual Property Review, 39(10), 607–622.Google Scholar
  23. Koch, T. (2014, October). Spain’s “Google tax” gets green light with sole support of Popular Party. El País. Retrieved from
  24. Krackhardt, D. (1987). QAP partialling as a test of spuriousness. Social Networks, 9, 171–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Majó-Vázquez, S. (2017). Digital news in Spain: Characteristics and effects of online news production and consumption. Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (UOC).Google Scholar
  26. Méndez, M. Á. (2017, February 7). Nuevo intento de imponer el canon AEDE: piden a Menéame 2, 5 millones de euros al año. Elconfidencial.Com. Retrieved from
  27. Napoli, P. (2008). Hyperlinking and the forces of Massification. In J. Turow & L. Tsui (Eds.), The hyperlinked society: Questioning connection in digital age (pp. 56–69). Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  28. Newman, M. E. J. (2006). Modularity and community structure in networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(23), 8577–8582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Newman, M. E. J. (2010). Networks: An introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Newman, M. E. J. (2012). Communities, modules and large-scale structure in networks. Nature Physics, 8(1), 25–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Newman, M. E. J., & Girvan, M. (2004). Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Physical Review E, 69(2), 26113. Scholar
  32. Newman, N. (2018). Journalism, media, and technology trends and predictions 2018. Oxford, UK. Retrieved from
  33. Park, H. W. (2003). Hyperlink network analysis: A new method for the study of social structure on the web. Connections, 25(1), 49–61.Google Scholar
  34. Park, H. W., & Thelwall, M. (2003). Hyperlink analyses of the World Wide Web: A review. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 8(4). Scholar
  35. Peixoto, T. P. (2017). Bayesian stochastic blockmodeling (No. arXiv:1705.10225). arXiv preprint. Retrieved from
  36. Prior, M. (2008). Are hyperlinks ‘weak ties’? In J. Turow & L. Tsui (Eds.), The hyperlinked society: Questioning connections in the digital age (pp. 227–249). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  37. Rawls, J. (2009). A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Rovall, M., & Bergstrom, C. (2008). Maps of random walks on complex network reveal community structure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(4), 1118–1123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rushe, D. (2014, December 11). Google News Spain to close in response to story links “tax.” The Guardian. Retrieved from
  40. Senftleben, M., Kerk, M., Buiten, M., & Heine, K. (2017). New rights or new business models? An inquiry into the future of publishing in the Digital Era. IIC-International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 48(5), 538–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sharkov, D. (2014, December 11). Google News quits Spain after tax row. Newsweek. Retrieved from
  42. Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Republic. com 2.0 (second). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Tewksbury, D. (2005). The seeds of audience fragmentation: Specialization in the use of online news sites. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 49(3), 332–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tribune. (2017, December 13). En matière d’information la gratuité est un mythe. Le Monde. Retrieved from
  45. Turow, J., & Tsui, L. (2009). The hyperlinked society: Questioning connections in the digital age. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Voss, A. (2018). On the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the council on copyright in the digital single market. Brussels. Retrieved from
  47. Wu, L., & Ackland, R. (2014). How Web 1.0 fails: The mismatch between hyperlinks and clickstreams. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 4(1), 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Xalabarder, R. (2016). Press publisher rights in the new copyright in the digital single market draft directive (CREATe Working Paper 2016/15). Glasgow.

Further Reading

  1. Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Johnson, J. C. (2013). Analyzing social networks. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. González-Bailón, S. (2017). Decoding the social world: Data science and the unintended consequences of communication (S. Braman, Ed.) (first). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  3. Kadushin, C. (2012). Understanding social networks: Theories, concepts and findings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Monge, P. R., & Contractor, N. S. (2003). Theories of communication networks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Salganik, M. J. (2017). Bit by bit: Social research in the digital age. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sílvia Majó-Vázquez
    • 1
  1. 1.Reuters Institute for the Study of JournalismUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations