Advertisement

Intervention Proposal of the Rehabilitation Nursing Care to the People in the ICU: Systematic Review of the Literature

  • Marco JacintoEmail author
  • Tânia Leite
  • César Fonseca
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 1016)

Abstract

The increase of the average life expectancy led to an increase in acute diseases requiring hospitalization in the ICU.

Goal: Identify the cares in rehabilitation nursing in the ICU to people under IMV and/or in prolonged rest in bed.

Methodology: Articles were selected between January 2010 and September 2018, and the research was carried out in the databases present at EBSCO. Six articles were selected that met the inclusion criteria, and the inclusion grid of JBI, FAME was also applied. Two further studies were included that did not fit the temporal limit, but which were included by their pertinence, obtaining a total of eight articles.

Interventions: The interventions that the rehabilitation nurse plans and executes can be divided into two categories that complement each other, the interventions of the physical domain and the cognitive domain.

Results/Discussion: Early rehabilitation in the ICU is a fundamental tool in maintaining autonomy, as many people acquire complications during hospitalization. To reverse these complications requires the intervention of a multidisciplinary team, where the Rehabilitation Nurse develops a prominent role in the articulation of the team and in the realization of a structured plan involving the person, their relatives and the rest of the care team.

Conclusion: The studies presented in this review are unanimous about the achievement of early rehabilitation for people hospitalized in the ICU, and these programs have the potential to bring significant gains to people, both physically and cognitively.

Keywords

Rehabilitation Nurse Intensive Care Unit Early rehabilitation 

References

  1. 1.
    Brummel, N., Jackson, J., Girard, T., et al.: A combined early cognitive and physical rehabilitation program for people who are critically ill: the activity and cognitive therapy in the intensive care unit (ACT-ICU) trial. Phys. Ther. 92(12), 1580–1592 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Medrinal, C., Combret, Y., Prieur, G., et al.: Comparison of exercise intensity during four early rehabilitation techniques in sedated and ventilated patients in ICU: a randomized cross-over trial. Crit. Care 22(110), 1–8 (2018)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yosef-Brauner, O., Adi, N., Shahar, T., Yehezkel, E., Carmeli, E.: Effect of physical therapy on muscle strength, respiratory muscles and functional parameters in patients with intensive care unit-acquired weakness. Clin. Respir. J. 9(1), 1–6 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hodgson, C., Stiller, K., Needham, D., et al.: Expert consensus and recommendations on safety criteria for active mobilization of mechanically ventilated critically ill adults. Crit. Care 18(658), 1–18 (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Morris, P., Berry, M., Files, C., et al.: Standardized rehabilitation and hospital length of stay among patients with acute respiratory failure: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 315(24), 2694–2702 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schujmann, D., Lunardi, A., Fu, C.: Progressive mobility program and technology to increase the level of physical activity and its benefits in respiratory, muscular system, and functionality of ICU patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 19(274), 1–10 (2018)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bailey, P., Thomsen, G., Spuhler, V., et al.: Early activity is feasible and safe in respiratory failure patients. Crit. Care Med. 35(1), 139–145 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Morris, P., Goad, A., Thompson, C., et al.: Early intensive care unit mobility therapy in the treatment of acute respiratory failure. Crit. Care Med. 36(8), 1–6 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rose, L., Adhikari, N., Poon, J., Lease, D., McKim, D.: Cough augmentation techniques in the critically Ill: A Canadian national survey. Respir. Care 61(10), 1360–1368 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hopkins, R., Mitchell, L., Schafer, M., Thomsen, G., Link, M., Brown, S.: Implementing a mobility program to minimize post-intensive care syndrome. AACN Adv. Crit. Care 27(2), 187–203 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Trees, D., Smith, J., Hockert, S.: Innovative mobility strategies for the patient with intensive care unit-acquired weakness: a case report. Phys. Ther. 9(2), 237–247 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ministry of Health: Evaluation of the National Situation of Intensive Care Units (2013). https://www.sns.gov.pt/wpcontent/uploads/2016/05/A3o-national-of-the-situation-of-units-of-care-intensive.pdf. Accessed 5 Oct 2018
  13. 13.
    Júnior, B., Martinez, B., Neto, M.: Braz. J. Intensive Ther. 26(1), 65–70 (2014)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cordeiro, M., Menoita, E.: Manual of Good Practices in Respiratory Rehabilitation: Concepts, Principles and Techniques, 1st edn. Luso-science, Loures (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Rehabilitation NursingPolytechnic Institute of SetúbalSetúbalPortugal
  2. 2.Rehabilitation NursingBeatriz Angelo’s HospitalLouresPortugal
  3. 3.Évora University, Investigator POCTEP 0445_4IE_4_PÉvoraPortugal

Personalised recommendations