Advertisement

Nursing Students Digital Competencies for the Self-management of Patients: Development of the DigiNurse Model’s Interface

  • Pedro ParreiraEmail author
  • Paulo Santos Costa
  • Anabela Salgueiro-Oliveira
  • Paulo Alexandre Ferreira
  • Liliana B. Sousa
  • Inês A. Marques
  • Rafael Bernardes
  • Raija Kokko
  • João Graveto
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 1016)

Abstract

Background: While the need for self-management support is increasing in the current aging European society, digital skills and competences in supporting self-management is not commonly a part of the nursing curriculum. In order to respond to this societal challenge, the Digital Nursing Model (DigiNurse) will be developed by an international consortium, offering a structured concept to be incorporated in the nursing curriculum. This project was financially supported through the Erasmus+ program, through the Key-Action “Cooperation for Innovation and the Exchange of Good Practices”. The final goal is to develop a digital interface to be used by nursing students in the follow-up of patients with chronic diseases, guided by the key-principles of the DigiNurse Model. Objective: To reflect on the different theoretical contributions that supports the creation of digital interfaces to develop digital skills/competences in nursing students and professionals. Conclusion: The development of digital skills in nursing students is important for the follow-up of patients with chronic diseases. So, the analysis of different models will support the development of DigiNurse Model, whose implementation in educational and pedagogical models in nursing curricula can contribute to significant improvements in health care of patients with chronic illness.

Keywords

Digital ICT Nursing Self-management Technology 

References

  1. 1.
    Donner, G.J., Wheeler, M.M., Conseil international des infirmières: Coaching in Nursing: An Introduction. International Council of Nurses (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jayadevappa, R.: Patient centered care - a conceptual model and review of the state of the art. Open Health Serv. Policy J. 4, 15–25 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.2174/1874924001104010015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Greene, S.M., Tuzzio, L., Cherkin, D.: A framework for making patient-centered care front and center. Perm. J. 16, 49–53 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2007.0630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lewis, C., Wharton, C.: Cognitive walkthroughs. In: Helander, M., Landauer, T., Prabhu, P. (eds.) Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 717–732. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bligård, L.O., Osvalder, A.L.: Enhanced cognitive walkthrough: development of the cognitive walkthrough method to better predict, identify, and present usability problems. Adv. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2013 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/931698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Blackmon, M.H., Polson, P.G., Kitajima, M., Lewis, C.: Cognitive walkthrough for the web. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Changing Our World, Changing Ourselves – CHI 2002, p. 463. ACM Press, New York (2002)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhang, J., Walji, M.F.: TURF: toward a unified framework of EHR usability. J. Biomed. Inform. 44, 1056–1067 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2011.08.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Passos, P.C.S.J.: Interad: uma metodologia para design de interface de materiais educacionais digitais (Master Thesis). Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Harvey, G., Kitson, A.: PARIHS revisited: from heuristic to integrated framework for the successful implementation of knowledge into practice. Implement. Sci. 11, 33 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0398-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stetler, C.B., Damschroder, L.J., Helfrich, C.D., Hagedorn, H.J.: A guide for applying a revised version of the PARIHS framework for implementation. Implement. Sci. 6, 99 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hyun, S., Johnson, S.B., Stetson, P.D., Bakken, S.: Development and evaluation of nursing user interface screens using multiple methods. J. Biomed. Inform. 42, 1004–1012 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2009.05.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Goodhue, D.L., Thompson, R.L.: Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Q. 19, 213 (1995).  https://doi.org/10.2307/249689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., Warshaw, P.R.: User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manage. Sci. 35, 982–1003 (1989).  https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chang, C.P.: The technology acceptance model and its application in a telehealth program for the elderly with chronic illnesses. J. Nurs. 62, 11–16 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.6224/JN.62.3.11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wu, I.-L., Chen, J.-L.: An extension of Trust and TAM model with TPB in the initial adoption of on-line tax: an empirical study. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 62, 784–808 (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHCS.2005.03.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rogers, E.M.: Lessons for guidelines from the diffusion of innovations. Jt. Comm. J. Qual. Improv. 21, 324–328 (1995).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1070-3241(16)30155-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Legris, P., Ingham, J., Collerette, P.: Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Inf. Manag. 40, 191–204 (2003).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00143-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nursing School of CoimbraCoimbraPortugal
  2. 2.The Health Sciences Research Unit: NursingCoimbraPortugal
  3. 3.Tampere UniversityTampereFinland

Personalised recommendations