Taking Responsibility: Truth, Trust, and Justice

  • Jon Nixon


In this chapter I refer to ideal collegial relationships as relationships of virtue and draw on the Aristotelian notion of virtuous friendship to clarify and ground the argument. I also presuppose a heterogeneous category of what I term ‘educational professionals’ that comprises a wide range of occupational groupings. We live in a society that is not only increasingly professionalised, but increasingly pedagogicised: a society, that is, in which professionals in different walks of life and different institutional settings define their professionalism, and mediate their professional practice, in increasingly pedagogical terms. Professionals are now expected to explain, persuade, mediate, consult, negotiate, and learn from, and with, their clients. That is all for the good, but it suggests new forms of collegiality across professional boundaries and new forms of public-professional engagement. It also suggests a renewed sense of intellectual solidarity: the ‘we’ and the ‘us’ that Said (Humanism and democratic criticism. Columbia University Press, New York, 2004) had in mind when he refers to ‘scholar-teachers’, carrying forward what he saw as a radical tradition of ‘critical humanism’, or the notion of ‘we scholars’ that Damrosch (We scholars: changing the culture of the university. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1995) evoked in his brave attempt to envisage ‘the next intellectuals’.


Responsibility Truth Trust Justice Virtuous friendship 


  1. Arendt, H. (1961/1977). Between past and future: Eight exercises in political thought. New York: Penguin Books. (First published by Faber & Faber, 1961, and with additional material by Viking Press, 1968).Google Scholar
  2. Arendt, H. (1978). The life of the mind. San Diego/New York/London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. Aristotle. (1976). The ethics of Aristotle: The Nicomachean ethics (J. A. K. Thompson, Trans., & Revised by H. Tredennick). London: Penguin Books. (First published by Allen and Unwin, 1953).Google Scholar
  4. Aristotle. (1992). The politics (T. A. Sinclair, Trans., & Revised and re-presented by T. J. Saunders). London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  5. Barash, J. (1999). The politics of memory: Reflections on practical wisdom and political identity. In R. Kearney & M. Dooley (Eds.), Questioning ethics: Contemporary debates in philosophy. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Bauman, Z. (2001). Community: Seeking safety in an insecure world. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bernstein, R. J. (2018). Why read Hannah Arendt now. Cambridge, MA/Medford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  8. Curren, R. R. (2000). Aristotle on the necessity of public education. Lanham/Boulder/New York/Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  9. Damrosch, D. (1995). We Scholars: Changing the Culture of the University. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Giddens, A. (1993). The transformation of intimacy: Sexuality, love and eroticism in modern societies. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hall, J. A. (1995). In search of civil society. In J. A. Hall (Ed.), Civil society: Theory, history, comparison (pp. 1–31). Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hutter, H. (1978). Politics as friendship: The origins of classical notions of politics in the theory and practice of friendship. Waterloo: Wilfred Laurier University Press.Google Scholar
  13. MacIntyre, A. (2006). Ethics and politics: Selected essays (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. MacMurray, J. (1957). The self as agent (1st volume of the Gifford Lectures delivered in the University of Glasgow, 1953–54). London: Faber and Faber Ltd.Google Scholar
  15. MacMurray, J. (1961). Persons in relation (2nd volume of the Gifford Lectures delivered in the University of Glasgow, 1953–54). London: Faber and Faber Ltd.Google Scholar
  16. McKibbin, R. (2006). The destruction of the public sphere. London review of books, 28(1), 3–6.Google Scholar
  17. Moltmann, J. (1967). Theology of hope: On the ground and the implications of Christian eschatology (J. W. Leitch, Trans.). London: SCM Press Ltd.Google Scholar
  18. Noddings, N. (1984). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  19. Noddings, N. (1999). Care, justice, and equity. In M. S. Katz, N. Noddings, & K. A. Strike (Eds.), Justice and caring: The search for common ground in education (pp. 7–20). New York/London: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  20. Nussbaum, M. C. (2000). Women and human development: The capabilities approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nussbaum, M. C. (2001). The fragility of goodness: Luck and ethics in Greek tragedy and philosophy (Revised ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. O’Neill, O. (1996). Towards justice and virtue: A constructive account of practical reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pahl, R. (2000). On friendship. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  24. Ricoeur, P. (2005). The course of recognition (D. Pellauer, Trans.). Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Said, E. W. (2004). Humanism and Democratic Criticism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Taylor, C. (2007). A secular age. Cambridge, MA/London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Todorov, T. (2003). Hope and memory: Lessons from the twentieth century (D. Bellos, Trans.) London: Atlantic Books.Google Scholar
  28. Weil, S. (2005). An anthology. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  29. Williams, R. (1989). In R. Gable (Ed.), Resources of hope: Culture, democracy, socialism. London/New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  30. Williams, B. (2002). Truth and truthfulness: An essay in genealogy. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Wolin, S. S. (2010). Democracy incorporated: Managed democracy and the specter of inverted totalitarianism. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Wolin, S. S. (2016). Fugitive democracy and other essays (N. Xenos, Ed.). Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jon Nixon
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.The Education University of Hong KongTai PoHong Kong
  2. 2.Middlesex UniversityLondonUK

Personalised recommendations