Advertisement

Women and Development: From Homemakers to Nation Builders

  • Richard J. Estes
Chapter
Part of the Social Indicators Research Series book series (SINS, volume 78)

Abstract

The twenty-first century is the century of the women. No longer restricted to gendered defined roles, women now are in the workplace in large numbers, own and operate their own businesses, occupy most of the seats in universities and, increasing, have become major contributors to science and technology along with their customary careers in functioning as caregivers and education of others. The changes in the socioeconomic and political status of women are occurring very rapidly and are embracing women in all regions and cultures of the world. These changes have opened doors to women and girls that many never previously knew even existed and, in doing so, are ending centuries of discrimination and neglect of their capacities for leadership in all fields of human development. No longer are societies denying themselves the talents and skills that women and girls bring to their families and communities but also to national and international development.

References

  1. Bazilchuk, N. (2018, March 30). Family life makes Nordic men happy. Science Nordic. Retrieved November 12, 2018 from http://sciencenordic.com/family-life-makes-nordic-men-happy
  2. Bertakis, K. D., Azari, R., Helms, L. J., Callahan, E. J., & Robbins, J. A. (2000). Gender differences in the utilization of health care services. Journal of Family Practice, 49(2), 147–152.Google Scholar
  3. Botkin-Kowacki, E. (2017, January 25). Are women scientists overlooked by journals as peer reviewers? The Christian Science Monitor. Retrieved November 4, 2018 from https://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2017/0126/Are-women-scientists-overlooked-by-journals-as-peer-reviewers
  4. Cohen, N. (2011, April 29). The top 40 most innovative international development organizations. Nonprofit Quarterly.Google Scholar
  5. Conference Board of Canada. (2013). Gender gap in tertiary education: International rankings. Retrieved November 8, 2018 from https://www.conferenceboard.ca/hcp/Details/education/gender-gap-tertiary.aspx?AspxAutoDetectCookieSupport=1
  6. Eckermann, L. (2014). Gender, life span, and quality of life: An international perspective. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Editors. (2017, August 27). University gender gap at record high as 30,000 more women accepted. The Guardian.Google Scholar
  8. Eisenchlas, S. A. (2013). Gender roles and expectations: Any changes online? SAGE Open, October–December 2013: 1–11.Google Scholar
  9. Essays, UK. (2013). The effects on women during the industrial revolution history essay. Retrieved from https://www.ukessays.com/essays/history/the-effects-on-women-during-the-industrial-revolution-history-essay.php?vref=1
  10. Estes, R. J. (2010). The world social situation: Development challenges at the outset of a new century. Social Indicators Research, 98(3), 363–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Estes, R. J. (2019). The social progress of nations, 1970–2020. Social Indicators Research (under review).Google Scholar
  12. Estes, R. J., & Sirgy, M. J. (2018). Advances in well-being: Toward a better world for all. London: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  13. Fidell, L. S., & DeLamater, J. D. (1971). Women in the professions. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  14. Ford, L. (2015). Millennium development goal 3: 15 achievements on gender equality. The Guardian, March 26. Retrieved November 1, 2018 from https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2015/mar/26/millennium-development-goal-3-15-achievements-on-gender-equality
  15. Friedan, B. (1963). The feminine mystique. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  16. Harper, I. H. (1922). The history of women suffrage. 6 Volumes. Washington, DC: National American Women Suffrage Association.Google Scholar
  17. International Confederation of Midwifery (ICM). (2018). About our work. Hague, The Netherlands. Retrieved November 26, 2018 from https://www.internationalmidwives.org/.
  18. International Labour Organization (ILO). (2018). Global commission on the future of work. Geneva, Switzerland: ILO.Google Scholar
  19. Jones-Rogers, S. E. (2019). They were her property: White women as slave owners in the American South. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lopez, M. H., & Gonzalez-Barrera, A. (2014, March 6). Women’s college enrollment gains leave men behind. Pew Research Center: Fact Tank.Google Scholar
  21. Loudon, I. (1993). Death in childbirth: An international study of maternal care and maternal mortality 1800–1950. London: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  22. Martin, V. (2007). Property. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  23. Mettrop, G. (1974). Child survival and family size. World of Irish Nursing, 3, 23–24.Google Scholar
  24. Moon, B-K. (2011). Address to the 66th general assembly: “We the Peoples.” Retrieved November 23, 2018 from https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/sg/speeches/2011-09-21/address-66th-general-assembly-we-peoples
  25. National Organization for Women (NOW). (2018). Help build a feminist future. Retrieved November 1, 2018 from https://now.org/
  26. Nearing, S., & Nearing, N. (1912). Women and social progress: A discussion of the biologic, domestic, industrial, and social possibilities of American Women. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  27. Roser, M., & Ortiz-Espina, E. (2018). Literacy. Retrieved November 12, 2018 from https://ourworldindata.org/literacy
  28. Save the Children. (2018). Save the children annual review 2017. New York/London: Save the Children.Google Scholar
  29. Science. (2018). Famous women scientists: The art of genius. Retrieved November 20, 2018 from https://www.famousscientists.org/10-famous-women-scientists/
  30. Striking Women. (2017). Women after the war year. Retrieved November 13, 2018 from http://striking-women.org/module/women-and-work/post-world-war-ii-1946-1970
  31. Tiliouine, H., & Estes, R. J. (Eds.). (2016). The state of social progress of Islamic societies: social, economic, political, and ideological challenges. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
  32. UN Women. (2000). Five-year Review of the implementation of the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action (Beijing + 5) held in the General Assembly, 5–9 June 2000. New York: UN Women.Google Scholar
  33. UN Women. (2018a). Women and the sustainable development goals (SDGs). New York: UN Women. Retrieved November 18, 2018 from http://www.unwomen.org/en/news/in-focus/women-and-the-sdgs
  34. UN Women. (2018b). Turning promises into action: Gender equality in the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. New York: UN Women.Google Scholar
  35. United Nations (UN). (1995). List of documents considered at the FWCW. Retrieved November 8, 2018 from http://www.un.org/esa/gopher-data/conf/fwcw/pim/doclist
  36. United Nations (UN). (2015). Millennium development goals 2015 and beyond. Retrieved November 5, 2018 from http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/gender.shtml
  37. United Nations (UN). (2018). Sustainable development goals: Knowledge platform. Retrieved November 1, 2018 from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/
  38. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP-HDR). (2005). Towards the rise of women in the Arab World. Cairo, Egypt: UNDP, Regional Bureau for Arab States (RBAS).Google Scholar
  39. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2018). Human development report, 2018: Human development indices and indicators. New York: UNDP.Google Scholar
  40. United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2018). Annual statistical report, 2018. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  41. United Nations Inter-Agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation (UN IGME). (2018). The under-five mortality rate has fallen by more than half since 1990. Retrieved November, 11, 2018 from https://data.unicef.org/topic/child-survival/under-five-mortality/.Google Scholar
  42. United Nations Population Division. (2017). World population prospects: Key findings and advance tables, 2017 revision. New York: UN Population Division, Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA).Google Scholar
  43. Vagianos, A. (2016). Women. HuffPost, September 27. Retrieved November 4, 2018 from https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/rights-women-have-gained-since-earning-the-right-to-vote_us_57e9ed33e4b0c2407cd93434-201
  44. Verloo, M. (2018). Varieties of opposition to gender equality in Europe. London/New York: Taylor & Francis and Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wilensky, H. L., & Lebeaux, C. N. (1965). Industrial society and social welfare. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  46. World Health Organization (WHO). (2017). Annual statistical report (p. 2017). Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.Google Scholar
  47. World Health Organization (WHO). (2018a). MDG 3: Promote gender equality and empower women. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO. Retrieved November 5, 2018 from http://www.who.int/topics/millennium_development_goals/gender/en/ Google Scholar
  48. World Health Organization (WHO). (2018b). WHO fact sheet: Sanitation. Retrieved November 21, 2018 from http://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/sanitation
  49. World Health Organization (WHO). (2018c). WHO fact sheet: Maternal mortality. Retrieved November 20, 2018 from http://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/maternal-mortality
  50. World Health Organization, UNICEF, United Nations Population Fund, and The World Bank (WHO et al.). (2015). Trends in maternal mortality: 1990 to 2015. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard J. Estes
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Social Policy & PracticeUniversity of PennsylvaniaNarberthUSA

Personalised recommendations