Verification of Sustainability
In this chapter, the possibility of achieving a sustainable global timber supply situation by 2025 or 2030 in accordance with the SDG No.15 is discussed. Seven major systems of Criteria and Indicators for SFM used in different regions around the world are reviewed and found to lack any quantitative indicators or threshold values, rendering them more or less useless for assessing whether sustainability is being achieved. Only the system adopted by the African Timber Organisation focuses on the practicalities of forest management at the FMU level. Some low cost systems for monitoring environmental factors and biodiversity are described.
KeywordsCriteria and indicators Monitoring Verification
- Deutsch, W. P., Busby, A., Oprecio, J. L., Bago-Labis, J. P., & Cequina, E. Y. (1998). Community based water-quality monitoring from data collection to sustainable management of water resources (Chapter 7). In Seeking sustainability. Virginia Water Resources Research Center.Google Scholar
- European Forestry Institute. (2013). Implementing criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management in Europe.Google Scholar
- ITTO (2011), The State of Tropical Forest Management 2011, ITTO Yokohama:JapanGoogle Scholar
- Forest Europe (2015) The State of Europe’s Forests 2015. https://foreteurope.org/state-europes-forestsreport-2015-report
- Linser, S., Wolfslehner, B., Bridge, S. R. J., Gritten, D., Johnson, S., Payn, T., et al. (2018). 25 years of criteria and indicators for sustainable Forest management: How Intergovernmental C&I Processes Have Made a difference. Forests, 9, 578. https://doi.org/10.3390/f9090578CrossRefGoogle Scholar