Advertisement

Just the Facts, Mammon: Aspirations to Moral and Cultural Neutrality

  • Victor V. Claar
  • Greg Forster
Chapter

Abstract

Shows how economists in the nineteenth century aspired to a morally and culturally neutral social science. Traces the roots of the positive-normative economic dichotomy—through David Ricardo, Nassau Senior, John Stuart Mill, J.E. Cairnes, William Stanley Jevons, and Henry Sidgwick—until John Neville Keynes solved the British “methodenstreit”: a conflict between historicists interested first in institutional arrangements, and an emerging new attraction to economic theorizing in Austria and at Cambridge. Neville Keynes once and for all cemented the positive-normative distinction, thereby ensuring the eventual success of Alfred Marshall’s Principles text. Friedrich List was father to the historicist movement in Germany and Austria, which was a reaction to the more theoretical work being carried out by the founders of the Austrian school.

References

  1. Alvey, James E. 2000. An Introduction to Economics as a Moral Science. International Journal of Social Economics 27: 1231–1251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bade, Robin, and Michael Parkin. 2013. Essential Foundations of Macroeconomics. New York, NY: Pearson.Google Scholar
  3. Bottum, Joseph. 2014. An Anxious Age. New York, NY: Image. Google Scholar
  4. Boulding, Kenneth E. 1970. Economics as a Science. New York: McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar
  5. Broad, C.D. 1950. Obituary: Dr. J.N. Keynes (1852–1949). Economic Journal 60: 403–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buchholz, Todd G. 1989. New Ideas from Dead Economists. New York: Plume. Google Scholar
  7. Cairnes, J.E. 1873. Essays in Political Economy. London: Macmillan. Google Scholar
  8. Ekelund, Robert B., and Robert F. Hébert. 1990. A History of Economic Theory and Method. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  9. Freud, Sigmund. 2010. Civilization and Its Discontents. New York: W.W Norton.Google Scholar
  10. Friedman, Milton. 1950. Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hammond, J. Daniel, and Claire H. Hammond. 2013. Religion and the Foundation of Liberalism. Modern Age 55 (1): 35–51.Google Scholar
  12. Heyne, Paul. 2008. “Are Economists Basically Immoral?” and Other Essays on Economics, Ethics and Religion . Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
  13. Hunter, James Davison. 2010. To Change the World. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Hutchison, T.W. 1964. “Positive” Economics and Policy Objectives. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  15. Jevons, W. Stanley. 1911. The Theory of Political Economy. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  16. Johnson, Paul. 1991. Modern Times. New York: HarperCollins. Google Scholar
  17. Keynes, John Neville, Various. The John Neville Keynes Diaries. Cambridge University Library. Google Scholar
  18. Keynes, John Neville. 1965. The Scope and Method of Political Economy. New York: Augustus M. Kelley.Google Scholar
  19. List, Friedrich. 1856 [1841]. The National System of Political Economy. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott.Google Scholar
  20. List, Friedrich. 1909 [1841]. The National System of Political Economy. London: Longmans, Green, and Co.Google Scholar
  21. Marsden, George M. 2006. Fundamentalism and American Culture. Oxford and New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  22. Mill, John Stuart. 1844. Essays on Some Unsettled Questions of Political Economy. London: John W. Parker.Google Scholar
  23. Mill, John Stuart. 1856. A System of Logic. London: John W. Parker and Son.Google Scholar
  24. von Mises, Ludwig. 1984. The Historical Setting of the Austrian School of Economics. Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute.Google Scholar
  25. Moore, Gregory. 2003. John Neville Keynes’s Solution to the English Methodenstreit. Journal of the History of Economic Thought 25 (2003): 5–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Myrdal, Gunnar. 1958. Value in Social Theory. New York: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
  27. Noll, Mark A. 1992. A History of Christianity in the United States and Canada. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
  28. Ricardo, David. 2004. The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
  29. Röpke, Wilhelm. 2015 [1941]. A Value Judgment on Value Judgments. Journal of Markets & Morality 18 (2): 497–514.Google Scholar
  30. Senior, Nassau W. 1836. An Outline of the Science of Political Economy. London: W. Clowes and Sons. Google Scholar
  31. Senior, Nassau W. 1861. Opening Address. In Report of the Thirtieth Meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
  32. Sidgwick, Henry. 1883. Principles of Political Economy. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  33. Stigler, George. 1959. The Politics of Political Economists. Quarterly Journal of Economics 73: 522–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Victor V. Claar
    • 1
  • Greg Forster
    • 2
  1. 1.Florida Gulf Coast UniversityFort MyersUSA
  2. 2.Trinity International UniversityDeerfieldUSA

Personalised recommendations