Advertisement

“Looking for an Amazing Game I Can Relax and Sink Hours into...”: A Study of Relevance Aspects in Video Game Discovery

  • Toine BogersEmail author
  • Maria Gäde
  • Marijn Koolen
  • Vivien Petras
  • Mette Skov
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11420)

Abstract

With the rapid growth of the video game industry over the past decade, there has been a commensurate increase in research activity focused on a variety of aspects of video games. How people discover the video games they want to play and how they articulate these information needs is still largely unknown, however. A better understanding of video game-related information needs and what makes a game relevant to a user could aid in the design of more effective, domain-specific search engines. In this paper we take a first step towards such domain-specific understanding. We present an analysis of a random sample of 521 complex game requests posted on Reddit. A coding scheme was developed that captures the 41 different aspects of relevance and information needs expressed in these requests. We find that game requests contain an average of close to 5 different relevance aspects. Several of these relevance aspects are geared specifically to video games, while others are more general.

Keywords

Query analysis Video games Game search Complex search Information need categorization Relevance aspects 

References

  1. 1.
    Video Game Industry Statistics, Trends & Data. https://www.wepc.com/news/video-game-statistics/. Accessed 4 Sept 2018
  2. 2.
    Aarseth, E., Smedstad, S.M., Sunnanå, L.: A multidimensional typology of games. In: Proceedings of 2003 DiGRA International Conference on Level Up (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Apperley, T.H.: Genre and game studies: toward a critical approach to video game genres. Simul. Gaming 37(1), 6–23 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bogers, T.: Searching for movies: an exploratory analysis of movie-related information needs. In: Proceedings of iConf 2015. iDEALS (2015)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bogers, T., Gäde, M., Koolen, M., Petras, V., Skov, M.: “What was this movie about this chick?”: A comparative study of relevance aspects in book and movie discovery. In: Chowdhury, G., McLeod, J., Gillet, V., Willett, P. (eds.) iConference 2018. LNCS, vol. 10766, pp. 323–334. Springer, Cham (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78105-1_36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bullard, J.: Playfully serious information for serious play: the integration of community values in an information resource. In: Proceedings of iConf 2013, pp. 389–397. iDEALS (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cairns, P., Cox, A., Nordin, A.I.: Immersion in digital games: review of gaming experience research. In: Angelides, M.C., Agius, H. (eds.) Handbook of Digital Games, pp. 337–361. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Elsweiler, D., Mandl, S., Lunn, B.K.: Understanding casual-leisure information needs: a diary study in the context of television viewing. In: IIiX 2010, pp. 25–34 (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fleiss, J.L.: Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychol. Bull. 76(5), 378–382 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gentile, D.A., Lynch, P.J., Linder, J.R., Walsh, D.A.: The effects of violent video game habits on adolescent hostility, aggressive behaviors, and school performance. J. Adolesc. 27(1), 5–22 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hochleitner, C., Hochleitner, W., Graf, C., Tscheligi, M.: A heuristic framework for evaluating user experience in games. In: Bernhaupt, R. (ed.) Game User Experience Evaluation. HIS, pp. 187–206. Springer, Cham (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15985-0_9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kaytoue, M., Silva, A., Cerf, L., Meira Jr., W., Raïssi, C.: Watch me playing, i am a professional: a first study on video game live streaming. In: Proceedings of 21st WWW, pp. 1181–1188. ACM (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lee, J., Clarke, R., Cho, H., Windleharth, T.: Understanding appeals of video games for readers’ advisory and recommendation. Ref. User Serv. Q. 57(2), 127 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lee, J.H., Clarke, R.I., Perti, A.: Empirical evaluation of metadata for video games and interactive media. JASIST 66(12), 2609–2625 (2015)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lee, J.H., Clarke, R.I., Rossi, S.: A qualitative investigation of users discovery, access, and organization of video games as information objects. J. Inf. Sci. 42(6), 833–850 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lee, J.H., Karlova, N., Clarke, R.I., Thornton, K., Perti, A.: Facet analysis of video game genres. In: Proceedingds of iConf 2014 (2014)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    McDonough, J., Kirschenbaum, M., Reside, D., Fraistat, N., Jerz, D.: Twisty little passages almost all alike: applying the FRBR model to a classic computer game. Digit. Humanit. Q. 4(2), 1869–1883 (2010)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Reuter, K.: Assessing aesthetic relevance: children’s book selection in a digital library. JASIST 58(12), 1745–1763 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Savolainen, R.: Everyday life information seeking: approaching information seeking in the context of ‘Way of Life’. Libr. Inf. Sci. Res. 17, 259–294 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sifa, R., Bauckhage, C., Drachen, A.: Archetypal game recommender systems. In: LWA, pp. 45–56 (2014)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sköld, O., Adams, S., Harviainen, J.T., Huvila, I.: Game research methods. chapter studying games from the viewpoint of information, pp. 57–73. ETC Press, Pittsburgh (2015)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Winget, M.A.: Videogame preservation and massively multiplayer online role-playing games: a review of the literature. JASIST 62(10), 1869–1883 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yee, N.: Motivations for play in online games. CyberPsychol. Behav. 9(6), 772–775 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Toine Bogers
    • 1
    Email author
  • Maria Gäde
    • 2
  • Marijn Koolen
    • 3
  • Vivien Petras
    • 2
  • Mette Skov
    • 4
  1. 1.Science, Policy and Information Studies, Department of Communication and PsychologyAalborg University CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
  2. 2.Berlin School of Library and Information ScienceHumboldt-Universität zu BerlinBerlinGermany
  3. 3.Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences – Humanities ClusterAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Department of Communication and PsychologyAalborg UniversityAalborgDenmark

Personalised recommendations