Advertisement

Illegal Aliens or Undocumented Immigrants? Towards the Automated Identification of Bias by Word Choice and Labeling

  • Felix HamborgEmail author
  • Anastasia Zhukova
  • Bela Gipp
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11420)

Abstract

Media bias, i.e., slanted news coverage, can strongly impact the public perception of topics reported in the news. While the analysis of media bias has recently gained attention in computer science, the automated methods and results tend to be simple when compared to approaches and results in the social sciences, where researchers have studied media bias for decades. We propose Newsalyze, a work-in-progress prototype that imitates a manual analysis concept for media bias established in the social sciences. Newsalyze aims to find instances of bias by word choice and labeling in a set of news articles reporting on the same event. Bias by word choice and labeling (WCL) occurs when journalists use different phrases to refer to the same semantic concept, e.g., actors or actions. This way, instances of bias by WCL can induce strongly divergent emotional responses from readers, such as the terms “illegal aliens” vs. “undocumented immigrants.” We describe two critical tasks of the analysis workflow, finding and mapping such phrases, and estimating their effects on readers. For both tasks, we also present first results, which indicate the effectiveness of exploiting methods and models from the social sciences in an automated approach.

Keywords

Media bias News slant News bias Content analysis Frame analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was partially supported by the Carl Zeiss Foundation and the Zukunftskolleg program of the University of Konstanz. We thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments.

References

  1. 1.
    Alsem, K.J., et al.: The impact of newspapers on consumer confidence: does spin bias exist? Appl. Econ. 40(5), 531–539 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840600707100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Angeli, G., et al.: Leveraging linguistic structure for open domain information extraction. In: Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (vol. 1: Long Papers), pp. 344–354 (2015)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baker, B.H., et al.: How to Identify, Expose & Correct Liberal Media Bias. Media Research Center, Alexandria (1994)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Balahur, A., et al.: Sentiment analysis in the news. arXiv preprint arXiv:1309.6202 (2013)
  5. 5.
    Baumer, E.P.S., et al.: Testing and comparing computational approaches for identifying the language of framing in political news. In: Human Language Technologies: The 2015 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the ACL, Denver, Colorado, USA, pp. 1472–1482 (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Business Insider: These 6 Corporations Control 90% of the Media in America. Lutz, Ashley (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chang, A.X., et al.: A comparison of named-entity disambiguation and word sense disambiguation. In: LREC, pp. 860–867 (2016)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chong, D., Druckman, J.N.: Framing theory. Ann. Rev. Polit. Sci. 10(1), 103–126 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.103054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Clark, K., Manning, C.D.: Deep reinforcement learning for mention-ranking coreference models. In: Empirical Methods on Natural Language Processing (2016)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Crossley, S.A., et al.: Sentiment analysis and social cognition engine (SEANCE): an automatic tool for sentiment, social cognition, and social-order analysis. Behav. Res. Method. 49(3), 803–821 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0743-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    DellaVigna, S., Kaplan, E.: The fox news effect: media bias and voting. Q. J. Econ. 122(3), 1187–1234 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.3386/w12169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ekman, P.: An argument for basic emotions. Cogn. Emot. 6, 169–200 (1992).  https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939208411068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Entman, R.M.: Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. J. Commun. 43(4), 51–58 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Entman, R.M.: Framing bias: media in the distribution of power. J. Commun. 57(1), 163–173 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Evans, D.K., et al.: Columbia newsblaster: multilingual news summarization on the web. In: Demonstration Papers at HLT-NAACL, pp. 1–4 (2004)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fast, E., et al.: Empath: understanding topic signals in large-scale text. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2016, San Jose, California, USA, pp. 4647–4657 (2016)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Frey, B.J., Dueck, D.: Clustering by passing messages between data points. Science 315(5814), 972–976 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136800MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gauthier, G.: In defence of a supposedly outdated notion: the range of application of journalistic objectivity. Can. J. Commun. 18(4), 497 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gentzkow, M., Shapiro, J.: Media bias and reputation. J. Polit. Econ. 114(2), 280–316 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1086/499414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Groseclose, T., Milyo, J.: A measure of media bias. Q. J. Econ. 120(4), 1191–1237 (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1162/003355305775097542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hamborg, F., et al. Automated identification of media bias in news articles: an interdisciplinary literature review. Int. J. Digit. Libr. (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-018-0261-y
  22. 22.
    Hamborg, F., et al.: Bias-aware news analysis using matrix-based news aggregation. Int. J. Digit. Libr. (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-018-0239-9
  23. 23.
    Hamborg, F., et al.: Extraction of main event descriptors from news articles by answering the journalistic Five W and One H questions. In: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL), Fort Worth, Texas, USA, pp. 339–340 (2018)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hamborg, F., Lachnit, S., Schubotz, M., Hepp, T., Gipp, B.: Giveme5 W: main event retrieval from news articles by extraction of the five journalistic W questions. In: Chowdhury, G., McLeod, J., Gillet, V., Willett, P. (eds.) iConference 2018. LNCS, vol. 10766, pp. 356–366. Springer, Cham (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78105-1_39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hamborg, F., et al.: Identification and analysis of media bias in news articles. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Symposium of Information Science, pp. 224–236 (2017)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hamborg, F., et al.: News-please: a generic news crawler and extractor. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Symposium of Information Science, pp. 218–223(2017)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kaya, M., et al.: Sentiment analysis of Turkish political news. In: Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology, vol. 01, pp. 174–180 (2012)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lee, Y.: To dream or not to dream: a cost-benefit analysis of the development, relief, and education for alien minors (DREAM) act. Cornell J. Law Public Policy 16(1), 231 (2006)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lim, S., et al.: Towards bias inducing word detection by linguistic cue analysis in news articles (2018)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lin, K.H.-Y., et al.: What emotions do news articles trigger in their readers? In: Proceedings of the 30th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval - SIGIR 2007, p. 733 (2007)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    McCarthy, J., et al.: Assessing stability in the patterns of selection bias in newspaper coverage of protest during the transition from communism in Belarus. Mobil.: Int. Q. 13(2), 127–146 (2008)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mehler, A., et al.: Spatial analysis of news sources. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 13, 127–146 (2006)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mikolov, T., et al.: Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR 2013) (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1162/153244303322533223
  34. 34.
    Mitchell, A., et al.: Political polarization and media habits. Pew Research Center (2014)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Munson, S.A., et al.: Encouraging reading of diverse political viewpoints with a browser widget. In: ICWSM (2013)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Munson, S.A., et al.: Sidelines: an algorithm for increasing diversity in news and opinion aggregators. In: ICWSM (2009)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Munson, S.A., Resnick, P.: Presenting diverse political opinions: how and how much. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1457–1466 (2010)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    News Bias Explored - The art of reading the news (2014). http://umich.edu/~newsbias/. Accessed 01 Aug 2018
  39. 39.
    Niven, D.: Tilt?: The Search for Media Bias. Greenwood Publishing Group, Westport (2002)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Oelke, D., et al.: Visual analysis of explicit opinion and news bias in German soccer articles. In: EuroVis Workshop on Visual Analytics, Vienna, Austria (2012)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Oliver, P.E., Maney, G.M.: Political processes and local newspaper coverage of protest events: from selection bias to triadic interactions. Am. J. Sociol. 106(2), 463–505 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Papacharissi, Z., de Fatima Oliveira, M.: News frames terrorism: a comparative analysis of frames employed in terrorism coverage in U.S. and U.K. newspapers. Int. J. Press/Polit. 13(1), 52–74 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161207312676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Park, S., et al.: NewsCube: delivering multiple aspects of news to mitigate media bias. In: Proceedings of CHI 2009, The SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 443–453 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518772
  44. 44.
    Park, S., et al.: NewsCube 2.0: an exploratory design of a social news website for media bias mitigation. In: Workshop on Social Recommender Systems (2011)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Park, S., et al.: The politics of comments: predicting political orientation of news stories with commenters’ sentiment patterns. In: Proceedings of the ACM 2011 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 113–122 (2011)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Price, V., et al.: Framing public discussion of gay civil unions. Public Opin. Q. 69, 179–212 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Recasens, M., et al.: Linguistic models for analyzing and detecting biased language. In: Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 1650–1659 (2013)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Rugg, D.: Experiments in wording questions: II. Public Opin. Q. 5, 91 (1941).  https://doi.org/10.1086/265467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Schuldt, J.P., et al.: “Global warming” or “climate change”? Whether the planet is warming depends on question wording. Public Opin. Q. 75, 115–124 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfq073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Smith, A., et al.: Hiérarchie: interactive visualization for hierarchical topic models. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Interactive Language Learning, Visualization, and Interfaces, pp. 71–78 (2014)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Smith, M.S., et al.: The General Inquirer: A Computer Approach to Content Analysis. American Sociological Review (1967)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Speer, R., Havasi, C.: Representing general relational knowledge in ConceptNet 5. In: Proceedings of the Eight International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2012 (2012)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Strapparava, C., Mihalcea, R.: Semeval-2007 task 14: affective text. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluations, pp. 70–74 (2007)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Tausczik, Y.R., Pennebaker, J.W.: The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. J. Lang. Soc. Psychol. 29(1), 24–54 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X09351676CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of KonstanzConstanceGermany

Personalised recommendations