Advertisement

Modeling User Actions in Job Search

  • Alfan Farizki WicaksonoEmail author
  • Alistair Moffat
  • Justin Zobel
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11437)

Abstract

Users of online job search tools interact with result pages in three different ways: via impressions, via clicks, and via applications. We investigate the relationship between these three kinds of interaction using logs provided by Seek.com, an Australian-based job search service. Our focus is on understanding the extent to which the three interaction types can be used to predict each other. In particular we examine models for inferring impressions from clicks, thereby providing system designers with new options for evaluating search result pages.

Notes

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the Australian Research Council’s Linkage Projects scheme (project number LP150100252) and by Seek.com.

References

  1. 1.
    Azzopardi, L., Thomas, P., Craswell, N.: Measuring the utility of search engine result pages. In: Proceedings of SIGIR, pp. 605–614 (2018)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Carterette, B.: System effectiveness, user models, and user utility: a conceptual framework for investigation. In: Proceedings of SIGIR, pp. 903–912 (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cutrell, E., Guan, Z.: What are you looking for? An eye-tracking study of information usage in web search. In: Proceedings of CHI, pp. 407–416 (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hasan, M.A., Parikh, N., Singh, G., Sundaresan, N.: Query suggestion for e-commerce sites. In: Proceedings of WSDM, pp. 765–774 (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Joachims, T., Granka, L., Pan, B., Hembrooke, H., Gay, G.: Accurately interpreting clickthrough data as implicit feedback. SIGIR Forum 51(1), 4–11 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Klöckner, K., Wirschum, N., Jameson, A.: Depth- and breadth-first processing of search result lists. In: Proceedings of CHI, pp. 1539–1539 (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mansouri, B., Zahedi, M.S., Campos, R., Farhoodi, M.: Online job search: study of users’ search behavior using search engine query logs. In: Proceedings of SIGIR, pp. 1185–1188 (2018)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Moffat, A., Zobel, J.: Rank-biased precision for measurement of retrieval effectiveness. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 27(1), 2.1–2.27 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Moffat, A., Bailey, P., Scholer, F., Thomas, P.: Incorporating user expectations and behavior into the measurement of search effectiveness. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 35(3), 24.1–24.38 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Parikh, N., Sundaresan, N.: Inferring semantic query relations from collective user behavior. In: Proceedings of CIKM, pp. 349–358 (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Smucker, M.D., Clarke, C.L.A.: Time-based calibration of effectiveness measures. In: Proceedings of SIGIR, pp. 95–104 (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Spina, D., et al.: Understanding user behavior in job and talent search: an initial investigation. In: SIGIR Workshop. eCommerce (2017)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Thomas, P., Scholer, F., Moffat, A.: What users do: the eyes have it. In: Banchs, R.E., Silvestri, F., Liu, T.-Y., Zhang, M., Gao, S., Lang, J. (eds.) AIRS 2013. LNCS, vol. 8281, pp. 416–427. Springer, Heidelberg (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45068-6_36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    White, R.W., Drucker, S.M.: Investigating behavioral variability in web search. In: Proceedings of WWW, pp. 21–30 (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wicaksono, A.F., Moffat, A.: Exploring interaction patterns in job search. In: Proceedings of Australasian Document Computing Symposium, pp. 2.1–2.8 (2018)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wicaksono, A.F., Moffat, A.: Empirical evidence for search effectiveness models. In: Proceedings of CIKM, pp. 1571–1574 (2018)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhang, Y., Park, L.A.F., Moffat, A.: Click-based evidence for decaying weight distributions in search effectiveness metrics. Inf. Retr. 13(1), 46–69 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Computing and Information SystemsThe University of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations