Advertisement

Understanding Aspirational Culture—Its Foundations and Development

  • Kevin MooreEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

The nature of aspirational culture is first presented in its everyday role in popular culture. Moore then argues that this culture is expressed at all scales within societies, from the deepest level of economic and ecological practices, through the social level to the personal level. He begins by discussing the foundation of aspirational culture on an ultrasocial form of economic life that humans share with social ants and termites through a dependency on agriculture. The argument is made that this has set the scene for the development, over history, of hierarchical societies that are focused on economic growth and which prioritise that growth over the wellbeing of individuals. Moore ends with a discussion of aspirational culture expressed at the personal level through daily experiences and myths

References

  1. Aanen, D. K., & Boomsma, J. J. (2006). Social-insect fungus farming [mini-review]. Current Biology, 16(24), R1014–R1016.Google Scholar
  2. Bar-On, Y. M., Phillips, R., & Milo, R. (2018). The biomass distribution on Earth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(25), 6506–6511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bauman, Z. (2007). Liquid times: Living in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  5. Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Boehm, C. (1993). Egalitarian behavior and reverse dominance hierarchy. Current Anthropology, 34(3), 227–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cantril, H. (1943). Identification with social and economic class. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 38(1), 74–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dunbar, R. I. M. (2014). The social brain: Psychological underpinnings and implications for the structure of organizations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(2), 109–114.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413517118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dyble, M., Salali, G. D., Chaudhary, N., Page, A., Smith, D., Thompson, J., et al. (2015). Sex equality can explain the unique social structure of hunter-gatherer bands. Science, 348(6236), 796.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa5139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ehrenreich, B. (2007). Dancing in the streets: A history of collective joy. New York: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
  11. Elias, N. (2000). The civilizing process: Sociogenetic and psychogenetic investigations (2nd ed.). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  12. Ewen, S. (1988). All consuming images: The politics of style in contemporary cultures (1st ed.). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  13. Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Giddens, A., & Pierson, C. (1998). Conversations with Anthony Giddens: Making sense of modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. González-Forero, M., & Gardner, A. (2018). Inference of ecological and social drivers of human brain-size evolution. Nature, 557(7706), 554–557.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0127-x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Gould, S. J., & Vrba, E. (1982). Exaptation—A missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology, 8(1), 4–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gowdy, J., & Krall, L. (2013). The ultrasocial origins of the Anthropocene. Ecological Economics, 95, 137–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gowdy, J., & Krall, L. (2014). Agriculture as a major evolutionary transition to human ultrasociality. Journal of Bioeconomics, 16, 179–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gowdy, J., & Krall, L. (2016). The economic origins of ultrasociality. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39, E92.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X1500059X.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Grouzet, F., Kasser, T., Ahuvia, A. C., Dols, J., Kim, Y., Lau, S., et al. (2005). The structure of goal contents across 15 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 800–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Hergenhahn, B. R. (2005). An introduction to the history of psychology. Belmont, CA: Thomson/Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  23. Holmes, M. (2016). Sociology for optimists. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (1996). Further examining the American dream: Differential correlates of intrinsic and extrinsic goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 280–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Leahey, T. H. (2000). A history of psychology: Main currents in psychological thought (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  26. Martin, S. J., Funch, R. R., Hanson, P. R., & Eun-Hye, Y. (2018). A vast 4000-year-old spatial pattern of termite mounds. Current Biology, 28, R1283–R1295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McAdams, D. P. (2013). The psychological self as actor, agent, and author. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 272–295.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612464657.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Pinker, S. (2011). The better angels of our nature: The decline of violence in history and its causes. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  29. Rogers, D. S., Deshpande, O., & Feldman, M. W. (2011). The spread of inequality: PLOS One, 6(9), e24683.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024683.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Sennett, R. (Ed.). (2006). The culture of the new capitalism. New Haven: Yale University Press. Retrieved from https://ebookcentral.proquest.com.
  31. Sheldon, K. M., & Kasser, T. (2008). Psychological threat and extrinsic goal striving. Motivation and Emotion, 32, 37–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shultz, S., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2006). Both social and ecological factors predict ungulate brain size. Proceedings: Biological Sciences, 273(1583), 207–215.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2005.3283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stokes, P. (2017). Temporal asymmetry and the self/person split. Journal of Value Inquiry, 51, 203–219.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10790-016-9563-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Veenhoven, R. (2010). Life is getting better: Societal evolution and fit with human nature. Social Indicators Research, 97(1), 105–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wright, R. (2004). A short history of progress. Toronto: House of Anansi Press. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Environment, Society and DesignLincoln UniversityLincolnNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations