Advertisement

How Do Japanese SMEs Generate Digital Business Value from SMACIT Technologies with Knowledge Creation?

  • Christian RieraEmail author
  • Junichi Iijima
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 976)

Abstract

This study provides further evidence from Japanese Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) on the capabilities organizations need in order to take advantage of the opportunities that digital technologies (such as Social, Mobile, Analytics, Cloud and IoT or SMACIT) offer. Quantitative data is used to validate and expand previous findings on the relationship between IT, Digital Business Value and Knowledge Creation Capabilities (KCC). KCC is explored as an organizational capability that moderates the value obtained from IT and digital technologies. The level of achievement of business objectives by IT and digital technologies was analyzed using four categories of business objectives from the Balanced Scorecard. The evidence shows that organizations that are able to efficiently apply IT to achieve business objectives can also experience similar results on digital technologies. This implies that in order to be successful with digital technologies, a foundation would be the successful delivery of IT. A deeper analysis was conducted on Knowledge Creation Process as a preliminary study yielded to inconclusive findings suggesting that KCC had a negative impact on business objectives in opposition to what Knowledge-based view may consider and; in opposite to the characteristic that SMACIT technologies are highly dependent on information and could be considered to go hand in hand with how new information and knowledge is combined in order to create new products and services.

Keywords

Knowledge Creating Capabilities Digital Business Value IT Business Value 

References

  1. 1.
    Benbya, H., Passiante, G., Belbaly, N.A.: Corporate portal: a tool for knowledge management synchronization. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 24(3), 201–220 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brynjolfsson, E., Hitt, M.: Beyond the productivity paradox. Commun. ACM 41(8), 49–55 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carcary, M., Doherty, E., Conway, G.: The adoption of cloud computing by Irish SMEs – an exploratory study. Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Eval. 17(1), 003–014 (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen, M., Chen, A.: Knowledge management performance evaluation: a decade review from 1995 to 2004. J. Inf. Sci. 32(1), 17–38 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Choi, B., Lee, S.: An empirical investigation of KM styles and their effect on corporate performance. Inf. Manag. 40, 403–417 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Davenport, T.H., Prusak, L.: Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (2000)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dedrick, J., Gurbaxani, V., Kraemer, K.L.: Information technology and economic performance: a critical review of the empirical evidence. ACM Comput. Surv. 35(1), 1–28 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grant, R.M.: Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organ. Sci. 7(4), 375–387 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kaplan, R., Norton, D.: The Balanced Scorecard - Translating Strategy into Action. Harvard Business Review Press, Boston (1996)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lewin, A., Massini, S.: Knowledge creation and organizational capabilities of innovating and imitating firms. In: Tsoukas, H., Mylonopoulos, N. (eds.) Organizations as Knowledge Systems, pp. 209–237. Palgrave Macmillan, London (2004).  https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230524545_10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Melville, N., Kraemer, K., Gurbaxani, V.: Review: information technology and organizational performance: an integrative model of IT business value. MIS Q. 28(2), 283–322 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry of Japan: Competitive IT Strategy SME Selection 100. http://www.meti.go.jp/english/press/2017/0531_003.html (English), http://www.meti.go.jp/policy/it_policy/investment/it_keiei/100sen.html (Japanese). Accessed 17 Feb 2018
  13. 13.
    Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H.: The Knowledge-Creating Company. Oxford University Press, New York (1995)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Riera, C., Iijima, J.: A study of the effect of organizational IQ on IT investment and productivity. In: International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, Shanghai, pp. 4185–4188 (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Riera, C., Senoo, D., Iijima, J.: A study of the effect of knowledge creating capabilities on corporate performance. Int. J. Knowl. Manag. Stud. 3(1/2), 116–133 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Riera, C., Iijima, J.: Linking knowledge creating capabilities, IT business value and digital business value: an exploratory study in Japanese SMEs. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (IC3 K 2017 KMIS), Funchal, Madeira, Portugal, vol. 3, pp. 29–40 (2017)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ross, J., Beath, C., Sebastian, I.: Digital ≠ Digital. Research Briefing, vol. XVII, no. 10. MIT Sloan Center for Information Systems Research, Cambridge, MA (2017)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ross, J., Sebastian, I., Beath, C., Mocker, M., Moloney, K., Fonstad, N.: Designing and executing digital strategies. In: Thirty Seventh International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 2016, Dublin (2016)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ross, J., et al.: The Technology Advantage Practice of The Boston Consulting Group: Designing digital organizations. Working paper no. 406. Centre for Information Systems Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA (2016)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sebastian, I., Ross, J., Beath, C., Mocker, M., Moloney, K., Fonstad, N.: How big old companies navigate digital transformation. MIS Q. Exec. 16(3), 197–213 (2017)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sandulli, F.D., Lopez-Sanchez, J.I., Rodriguez-Duarte, A., Fernandez-Mendez, J.: Analysing the IT Paradox in the Supply Chain (2007). https://ssrn.com/abstract=1105687. Accessed 20 May 2017
  22. 22.
    SME Agency: White Paper on Small and Medium Enterprises in Japan (2016). http://www.chusho.meti.go.jp/pamflet/hakusyo/H28/download/2016hakushopanflet_eng.pdf. Accessed 20 May 2017
  23. 23.
    Teece, D.J., Pisano, G., Shuen, A.: Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strateg. Manag. J. 18(7), 509–534 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Weill, P.: The relationship between investment in information technology and firm performance: a study of the value manufacturing sector. Inf. Syst. Res. 3(4), 307–333 (1992)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Weill, P., Aral, S.: IT assets, organizational capabilities and firm performance: how resource allocations and organizational differences explain performance variation. Organ. Sci. 18(5), 763–780 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tokyo Institute of TechnologyMeguroJapan

Personalised recommendations