Advertisement

Case Study: Elaborating a Negotiated Agreement on Protected Area Concessions: Missed Opportunities for Exercising Corporate Sustainability and Responsibility in New Zealand

  • Valentina DinicaEmail author
Chapter
Part of the CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance book series (CSEG)

Abstract

CSR 2.0 enlarged the area of corporate responsibility to that of policy-making. Businesses are challenged to help codesign governance and policy frameworks that are more effective at environmental protection. Such frameworks can help create the level-playing field among competitors—which businesses often invoke as necessary for them to engage in more ambitious environmental improvement targets. This case-study argues that the tourism sector in New Zealand missed an important opportunity to map and incorporate environmental performance measures and criteria into a key policy document of relevance for sustainable tourism: the 2008–2018 negotiated agreements for the allocation of tourism concession in limited-supply contexts, in Protected Areas. By applying the PARO framework (Policy Activities—Recruitment methods—Objectives), it is shown that special and generous stakeholder engagement opportunities were offered to the tourism industry representative organisation to co-design this policy instrument.

Keywords

Protected Areas Concessions Environmental sustainability Stakeholder engagement New Zealand 

References

  1. Ainge Roi, E. (2018). World’s finest walk: New Zealand’s Milford Track being spoiled by tourist hordes’, The Guardian, 21 January 2018, Retrieved 12 June 2018 at https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/jan/22/worlds-finest-walk-new-zealands-milford-track-spoilt-tourists.
  2. Becken, S., & Hay, J. E. (2007). Tourism and climate change: Risks and opportunities. Clevedon: Channel View Publications.Google Scholar
  3. Church, L. (2017). Toilet paper just littered down the side of the tracks. Radio New Zealand. Retrieved 1 July 2018 at https://www.radionz.co.nz/news/national/340394/toilet-paper-just-littered-down-the-side-of-the-tracks.
  4. Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund. (no date). New Zealand. Retrieved 14 November 2017 at https://www.cepf.net/our-work/biodiversity-hotspots/new-zealand/.
  5. DOC. (2010). Concessions Reviewing Report. Wellington. Retrieved 30 September 2017 at http://www.doc.govt.nz/Documents/about-doc/concessions-and-permits/concessions/concessions-processing-review-report.pdf.
  6. DOC. (2016). Statement of Intent 2016–2020. Retrieved 12 June 2018 at https://www.doc.govt.nz/Documents/about-doc/role/publications/statement-of-intent-2016–2020.pdf.
  7. DOC & TIANZ. (2008). Agreement regarding concession allocation in limited supply situations re incumbent operators. Wellington.Google Scholar
  8. Dinica, V. (2017). Tourism concessions in National Parks: neo-liberal governance experiments for a Conservation Economy in New Zealand. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 25(12), 1811–1829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dinica, V. (2018a). Public engagement in governance for sustainability: a two-tier assessment approach and illustrations from New Zealand. Public Management Review, in Special Issue on Sustainable Public Management, 20(1), 23–54.Google Scholar
  10. Dinica, V. (2018b). The environmental sustainability of protected area tourism: towards a concessions focused theory of regulation. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 26(1), 146–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dinica, V. (2014). Tourism concessions in National Parks: Neo-liberal tools for a Conservation Economy in New Zealand. Full research paper presented at the BEST-EN Think Tank XIV: Politics, Policy and Governance in Sustainable Tourism, June 23–26, 2014, Faculty of Economics, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia.Google Scholar
  12. Espiner, S. R., & Wilson, J. D. (2013). Monitoring the effects of aircraft over-flights on visitors to the Glaciers, Westland Tai Poutini National Park, New Zealand: A report presenting results from the 2013 visitor survey. Report prepared for the West Coast Conservancy, Department of Conservation, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  13. Fowler, P. (2017). Tests reveal source of Havelock North water contamination. Radio New Zealand. Retrieved 2 July 2018 at https://www.radionz.co.nz/news/national/323594/tests-reveal-source-of-havelock-north-water-contamination.
  14. Hampton, L. (2017). Tongariro Crossing struggling to cope with hordes of tourists. Newshub. Retrieved 1 July 2018 at https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/new-zealand/2017/02/tongariro-crossing-struggling-to-cope-with-hordes-of-tourists.html.
  15. Johnson, J., & Lloyd, K. (2000). Commercial Concessions on Conservation Land. In: Lloyd K (Ed.), Managing New Zealand’s Wild Lands. Proceedings of the FMC Wild Lands conference, Rotoiti Lodge, 14–15 October 2000. Federated Mountain Clubs. pp. 22–33.Google Scholar
  16. Johnson, S. & Lloyd, K. (2002). Environmental Assessment of Concessions for Tourism and Commercial Activities under Conservation Act 1987. Butterworths Resource Management Bulletin 9:100–105. Viewed at http://users.actrix.co.nz/simonjohnson/brmb1.htm. On 02/06/2014.
  17. Lepla, L. (2018). Waste planning for a booming tourist town. New Zealand Local Government Magazine. Retrieved 1 May 2018 at https://localgovernmentmag.co.nz/lg-magazine/waste-management-lg/queenstowns-waste-concerns/.
  18. Leung, Y.-F., Spenceley, A., Hvenegaard, G., & Buckley, R. (2015). Tourism and visitor management in protected areas: Guidelines towards sustainability. Gland: IUCN.Google Scholar
  19. Lunn, H. J. (1994). Tourism policy and the Conservation estate: A Tragedy of the Commons? Unpublished Master Thesis. New Zealand: Lincoln University.Google Scholar
  20. McKay, H. (2006). Applying the Limits of Acceptable Change Process to Visitor Impact Management in New Zealand’s Natural Areas. New Zealand: Lincoln University.Google Scholar
  21. Ministry for Culture and Heritage (no date). Protected Areas. Retrieved 1 July 2018 at https://teara.govt.nz/en/protected-areas/page-1.
  22. National Parks Service. (2011). Federal regulations regarding concession contracts in national parks (Report No. 36-CFR-51). Retrieved 2 February 1016 from http://www.nps.gov/commercialservices/policies.htm?filter_topic-set=topic-set6.
  23. Natural Heritage Collection. (no date). Endangered Species of New Zealand. Retrieved 1 July 2018 at http://www.nhc.net.nz/.
  24. Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment (1997a). Management of the environmental effects associated with the tourism sector: Submissions. Wellington.Google Scholar
  25. Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment (1997b). Management of the environmental effects associated with the tourism sector: Main Report. Wellington.Google Scholar
  26. Thompson, A., Massyn, P. J., Pendry, J., & Pastorelli, J. (2014). Tourism concessions in protected natural areas: Guidelines for managers. United Nations Development Programme.Google Scholar
  27. Tourism Industry Association New Zealand [TIANZ]. (2006). Concession allocation by the Department of Conservation where supply is limited: submission. Retrieved from www.tianz.org.nz. On 1 July 2013.
  28. West Coast Conservancy. (2012). Draft Westland Tai Poutini National Park Management Plan Partial Review, notified December 2012. Franz Josef. Retrieved 3 March 2014 at http://www.doc.govt.nz/Documents/getting-involved/consultations/current-consultations/west-coast/draft-westland-plan-partial-review.pdf.
  29. Wyman, M., Barborak, J. R., Inamdar, N., & Stein, T. (2011). Best practices for tourism concessions in Protected Areas: A review of the field. Forests, 2(4), 913–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Yeoman, S. (2016). Human waste and rubbish at historic Lake Tekapo church. New Zealand Herald. Retrieved 1 July 2018 at https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11593953.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of GovernmentVictoria University of WellingtonWellingtonNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations