Advertisement

Reduced Graphene Oxide-Based Photocatalysis

  • R. Suresh
  • R. V. Mangalaraja
  • Héctor D. Mansilla
  • Paola Santander
  • Jorge YáñezEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Environmental Chemistry for a Sustainable World book series (ECSW, volume 34)

Abstract

Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs), especially photocatalysis, have arisen as a promising solution for the decomposition of harmful organic pollutants in contaminated water. Among various photocatalytic materials, nanocomposites based on reduced graphene oxide (RGO) coupled with semiconductor(s) and/or metal nanoparticles are of significant relevance since they have suitable physicochemical and optical properties such as excellent adsorption of pollutants from aqueous solutions, solar light harvesting tendencies, high photocharge separation efficiency, and excellent stability. Hence, RGO-based composites can have superior photocatalytic activity regarding the photodegradation of a broad range of organic pollutants. This chapter mainly focuses on the photocatalytic performances of recently developed RGO-based binary, ternary, and quaternary nanocomposites. The role of RGO in the improvement of photocatalysts is explained taking into account the most recent literature. An improvement strategy like metal and non-metal doping of RGO or semiconductors is also outlined. The photocatalytic activities of RGO-based ternary nanocomposites such as RGO/dual semiconductors, RGO/metal/semiconductor, and RGO/dual metal-free semiconductors are also briefly explained. The photocatalytic performance of RGO-based ternary nanocomposites is described. Furthermore, the plausible photocatalytic pathway for generation of free radicals by RGO-based composites is also explained in detail. This book chapter will be useful to researchers in the field of material science for developing new RGO-based photocatalysts with superior activity and low production costs.

Keywords

Reduced graphene oxide Photocatalyst Composites Pollutants Adsorption Environmental remediation Binary composite Ternary composite Reducing graphene 

Notes

Acknowledgments

RS acknowledges the National Commission for Scientific and Technological Research (CONICYT), Santiago, Chile, for the financial assistance in the form of postdoctoral fellowship (Fondecyt Project No: 3160499). The authors thank the support of the projects FONDECYT 1151296; Center Optics and Photonics, Grant CONICYT-PFB-0824 and CONICYT/FONDAP/15110019.

References

  1. Alansi AM, Qunaibit MA, Alade IO, Qahtan TF, Saleh TA (2018) Visible-light responsive BiOBr nanoparticles loaded on reduced grapheme oxide for photocatalytic degradation of dye. J Mol Liq 253:297–304.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2018.01.034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aleksandrzak M, Kukulka W, Mijowska E (2017) Graphitic carbon nitride/graphene oxide/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites for photoluminescence and photocatalysis. Appl Surf Sci 398:56–62.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.12.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Appavu B, Kannan K, Thiripuranthagan S (2016) Enhanced visible light photocatalytic activities of template free mesoporous nitrogen doped reduced graphene oxide/titania composite catalysts. J Ind Eng Chem 36:184–193.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2016.01.042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bagherzadeh M, Kaveh R (2018) A new SnS2-BiFeO3/reduced graphene oxide photocatalyst with superior photocatalytic capability under visible light irradiation. J Photochem Photobiol A 359:11–22.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2018.03.031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bhunia SK, Jana NR (2014) Reduced graphene oxide-silver nanoparticle composite as visible light photocatalyst for degradation of colorless endocrine disruptors. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:20085–20092.  https://doi.org/10.1021/am505677x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Borthakur P, Boruah PK, Darabdhara G, Sengupta P, Das MR, Boronin AI, Kibis LS, Kozlova MN, Fedorov VE (2016) Microwave assisted synthesis of CuS-reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite with efficient photocatalytic activity towards azo dye degradation. J Environ Chem Eng 4:4600–4611.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2016.10.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen X, Zhao Q, Li X, Wang D (2016) Enhanced photocatalytic activity of degrading short chain chlorinated paraffins over reduced graphene oxide/CoFe2O4/Ag nanocomposite. J Colloid Interface Sci 479:89–97.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2016.06.053 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen C, Zhang Y, Zeng J, Zhang F, Zhou K, Bowen CR, Zhang D (2017) Aligned macroporous TiO2/chitosan/reduced graphene oxide (rGO) composites for photocatalytic applications. Appl Surf Sci 424:170–176.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.02.137 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cho EC, Ciou JH, Zheng JH, Pan J, Hsiao YS, Lee KC, Huang JH (2015) Fullerene C70 decorated TiO2 nanowires for visible-light-responsive photocatalyst. Appl Surf Sci 355:536–546.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.07.062 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Du M, Xiong S, Wu T, Zhao D, Zhang Q, Fan Z, Zeng Y, Ji F, He Q, Xu X (2016) Preparation of a microspherical silver-reduced graphene oxide-bismuth vanadate composite and evaluation of its photocatalytic activity. Materials 9:160(14 pages).  https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9030160 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fakhri A, Kahi DS (2017) Synthesis and characterization of MnS2/reduced graphene oxide nanohybrids for with photocatalytic and antibacterial activity. J Photochem Photobiol B 166:259–263.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2016.12.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Feng J, Hou Y, Wang X, Quan W, Zhang J, Wang Y, Li L (2016) In-depth study on adsorption and photocatalytic performance of novel reduced graphene oxide-ZnFe2O4-polyaniline composites. J Alloys Compd 681:157–166.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.04.146 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fu L, Xia T, Zheng Y, Yang J, Wang A, Wang Z (2015) Preparation of WO3-reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites with enhanced photocatalytic property. Ceram Int 41:5903–5908.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.01.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gao S, Jiao S, Lei B, Li H, Wang J, Yu Q, Wang D, Guo F, Zhao L (2015) Efficient photocatalyst based on ZnO nanorod arrays/p-type boron-doped-diamond heterojunction. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 26:1018–1022.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-014-2498-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ghosh S, Basu S, Baskey(Sen) M (2017) Decorating mechanism of Mn3O4 nanoparticles on reduced graphene oxide surface through reflux condensation method to improve photocatalytic performance. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 28:17860–17870.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-017-7727-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hu J, Liu Y, Men J, Zhang L, Huang H (2016) Ag modified LaMnO3 nanorods-reduced graphene oxide composite applied in the photocatalytic discoloration of direct green. Solid State Sci 61:239–245.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2016.10.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hui KN, Hui KS, Zhang XL et al (2016) Photosensitization of ZnO nanowire-based electrodes using one-step hydrothermally synthesized CdSe/CdS (core/shell) sensitizer. Sol Energy 125:125–134.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2015.12.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Huo P, Liu C, Wu D, Guan J, Li J, Wang H, Tang Q, Li X, Yan Y, Yuand S (2018) Fabricated Ag/Ag2S/reduced graphene oxide composite photocatalysts for enhancing visible light photocatalytic and antibacterial activity. J Ind Eng Chem 57:125–133.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2017.08.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Iliev V, Tomova D, Bilyarska L (2018) Promoting the oxidative removal rate of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid on gold-doped WO3/TiO2/reduced graphene oxide photocatalysts under UV light irradiation. J Photochem Photobiol A 351:69–77.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2017.10.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jiang T, Zhang L, Ji M, Wang Q, Zhao Q, Fu X, Yin H (2013) Carbon nanotubes/TiO2 nanotubes composite photocatalysts for efficient degradation of methyl orange dye. Particuology 11:737–742.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.partic.2012.07.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kanishka K, Silva HD, Huang HH, Yoshimura M (2018) Progress of reduction of graphene oxide by ascorbic acid. Appl Surf Sci 447:338–346.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.03.243 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Khavar AHC, Moussavi G, Mahjoub AR, Satari M, Abdolmaleki P (2018) Synthesis and visible-light photocatalytic activity of In,S-TiO2@rGO nanocomposite for degradation and detoxification of pesticide atrazine in water. Chem Eng J 345:300–311.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.03.095 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Khojasteh H, Niasari MS, Sangsefidi FS (2018) Photocatalytic evaluation of RGO/TiO2NWs/Pd-Ag nanocomposite as an improved catalyst for efficient dye degradation. J Alloys Compd 746:611–618.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.02.345 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kumar S, Kumar A (2017) Enhanced photocatalytic activity of rGO-CeO2 nanocomposites driven by sunlight. Mater Sci Eng B 223:98–108.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2017.06.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kumar S, Ojha AK, Walkenfort B (2016) Cadmium oxide nanoparticles grown in situ on reduced graphene oxide for enhanced photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue dye under ultraviolet irradiation. J Photochem Photobiol B 159:111–119.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2016.03.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Li X, Yu J, Wageh S, Ghamdi AAA, Xie J (2016) Graphene in photocatalysis: a review. Small 12:6640–6696.  https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201600382 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Liang Z, Yang J, Zhou C, Mo Q, Zhang Y (2018) Carbon quantum dots modified BiOBr microspheres with enhanced visible light photocatalytic performance. Inorg Chem Commun 90:97–100.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inoche.2018.02.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Liu Q, Shen J, Yang X, Zhang T, Tang H (2018a) 3D reduced graphene oxide aerogel-mediated Z-scheme photocatalytic system for highly efficient solar-driven water oxidation and removal of antibiotics. Appl Catal B-Environ 232:562–573.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.03.100 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liu B, Lin L, Yu D, Sun J, Zhu Z, Gao P, Wang W (2018b) Construction of fiber-based BiVO /SiO /reduced graphene oxide (RGO) with efficient visible light photocatalytic activity. Cellulose 25:1089–1101.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1628-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lu B, Zeng S, Li C, Wang Y, Pan X, Zhang L, Mao H, Lu Y, Ye Z (2018) Nanoscale p-n heterojunctions of BiOI/nitrogen-doped reduced graphene oxide as a high performance photocatalyst. Carbon 132:191–198.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2018.02.038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Miao Y, Wang X, Wang W, Zhou C, Feng G, Cai J, Zhang R (2017) Synthesis of cobalt-doped ZnO/rGO nanoparticles with visible-light photocatalytic activity through a cobalt-induced electrochemical method. J Energy Chem 26:549–555.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2016.10.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Miranda C, Mansilla H, Yánez J, Obregón S, Colón G (2013) Improved photocatalytic activity of g-C3N4/TiO2 composites prepared by a simple impregnation method. J Photochem Photobiol A 253:16–21.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2012.12.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nouri M, Saray AM, Azimi HR, Yousefi R (2017) High solar-light photocatalytic activity of using Cu3Se2/rGO nanocomposites synthesized by a green co-precipitation method. Solid State Sci 73:7–12.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2017.09.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pei S, Cheng HM (2012) The reduction of graphene oxide. Carbon 50:3210–3228.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2011.11.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Peng H, Jing N, Miao Y, Yan LS (2017) Facile solvothermal synthesis of reduced graphene oxide-BiPO4 nanocomposite with enhanced photocatalytic activity. Chin J Anal Chem 45(3):357–362.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-2040(17)61000-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Prabhu S, Pudukudy M, Sohila S, Harish S, Navaneethan M, Navaneethan D, Ramesh R, Hayakawa Y (2018) Synthesis, structural and optical properties of ZnO spindle/reduced graphene oxide composites with enhanced photocatalytic activity under visible light irradiation. Opt Mater 79:186–195.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2018.02.061 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Qin J, Yang C, Cao M, Zhang X, Saravanan R, Limpanart S, Mab M, Liu R (2017) Two-dimensional porous sheet-like carbon-doped ZnO/g-C3N4nanocomposite with high visible-light photocatalytic performance. Mater Lett 189:156–159.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2016.12.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rad TS, Khataee A, Pouran SR (2018) Synergistic enhancement in photocatalytic performance of Ce(IV) and Cr(III) co-substituted magnetite nanoparticles loaded on reduced graphene oxide sheets. J Colloid Interface Sci 528:248–262.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2018.05.087 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Raghavan N, Thangavel S, Sivalingam Y, Venugopal G (2018) Investigation of photocatalytic performances of sulfur based reduced graphene oxide-TiO2 nanohybrids. Appl Surf Sci 449:712–718.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.01.043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rahimi K, Zafarkish H, Yazdani A (2018) Reduced graphene oxide can activate the sunlight-inducedphotocatalytic effect of NiO nanowires. Mater Design 144:214–221.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.02.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rosy A, Kalpana G (2018) Reduced graphene oxide/strontium titanate heterostructured nanocomposite as sunlight driven photocatalyst for degradation of organic dye pollutants. Curr Appl Phys 18:1026–1033.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cap.2018.05.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sadiq MMJ, Shenoy US, Bhat DK (2017a) Enhanced photocatalytic performance of N-doped RGO-FeWO4/Fe3O4 ternary nanocomposite in environmental applications. Mater Today Chem 4:133–141.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtchem.2017.04.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sadiq MMJ, Shenoy US, Bhat DK (2017b) NiWO4-ZnO-NRGO ternary nanocomposite as an efficient photocatalyst for degradation of methylene blue and reduction of 4-nitro phenol. J Phys Chem Solids 109:124–133.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2017.05.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Selvam NCS, Kim YG, Kim DJ, Hong WH, Kim W, Park SH, Jo WK (2018) Reduced graphene oxide-mediated Z-scheme BiVO4/CdS nanocomposites for boosted photocatalytic decomposition of harmful organic pollutants. Sci Total Environ 635:741–749.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.169 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shamsabadi TM, Goharshadi EK, Shafaee M, Niazi Z (2018) ZnS@reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite as an effective sunlight driven photocatalyst for degradation of reactive black 5: a mechanistic approach. Sep Purif Technol 202:326–334.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2018.04.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sharma A, Lee BK (2016) Integrated ternary nanocomposite of TiO2/NiO/reduced grapheme oxide as a visible light photocatalyst for efficient degradation of o-chlorophenol. J Environ Manag 181:563–573.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.07.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sharma G, Naushad M, Pathania D, Kumar A (2016) A multifunctional nanocomposite pectin thorium(IV) tungstomolybdate for heavy metal separation and photoremediation of malachite green. Desalin Water Treat 57:19443–19455.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2015.1096834 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shen H, Zhao X, Duan L, Liu R, Wu H, Hou T, Jiang X, Gao H (2017) Influence of interface combination of RGO-photosensitized SnO2@RGO core-shell structures on their photocatalytic performance. Appl Surf Sci 391:627–634.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.06.031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shetty K, Lokesh SV, Rangappa D, Nagaswarupa HP, Nagabhushana H, Anantharaju KS, Prashantha SC, Vidya YS, Sharma SC (2017) Designing MgFe2O4 decorated on green mediated reduced graphene oxide sheets showing photocatalytic performance and luminescence property. Physica B 507:67–75.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2016.11.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Song C, Fan M, Shi W, Wang W (2018) High-performance for hydrogen evolution and pollutant degradation of reduced graphene oxide/two-phase g-C3N4 heterojunction photocatalysts. Environ Sci Pollut R 25:14486–14498.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1502-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Stefanska KS, Fluder M, Tylus W, Jesionowski T (2018) Investigation of amino-grafted TiO2/reduced graphene oxide hybridsas a novel photocatalyst used for decomposition of selected organic dyes. J Environ Manag 212:395–404.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.02.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Thangavel S, Venugopal G, Kim SJ (2014) Enhanced photocatalytic efficacy of organic dyes using β-tin tungstate reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites. Mater Chem Phys 145:108–115.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2014.01.046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Vasilaki E, Georgaki I, Vernardou D, Vamvakaki M, Katsarakis N (2015) Ag-loaded TiO2/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites forenhanced visible-light photocatalytic activity. Appl Surf Sci 353:865–872.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.07.056 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Vinoth R, Babu SG, Ramachandran R, Neppolian B (2017) Bismuth oxyiodide incorporated reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite material as an efficient photocatalyst for visible light assisted degradation of organic pollutants. Appl Surf Sci 418:163–170.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.01.278 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wang W, Shen J, Li N, Ye M (2013) Synthesis of novel photocatalytic RGO–ZnWO4 nanocomposites with visible light photoactivity. Mater Lett 106:284–286.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2013.05.042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wang A, Li X, Zhao Y, Wu W, Chen J, Meng H (2014) Preparation and characterizations of Cu2O/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites with high photo-catalytic performances. Powder Technol 261:42–48.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2014.04.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wang C, Wang AW, Feng J, Li Z, Chen B, Wu QH, Jiang J, Lu J, Li YY (2017a) Hydrothermal preparation of hierarchical MoS2-reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites towards remarkable enhanced visible-light photocatalytic activity. Ceram Int 43:2384–2388.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.11.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wang W, Liu Y, Zhang H, Qian Y, Guo Z (2017b) Re-investigation on reduced graphene oxide/AG2CO3 composite photocatalyst: an insight into the double-edged sword role of RGO. Appl Surf Sci 396:102–109.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.11.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wang L, Shi Y, Wang T, Zhang L (2017c) Silver chloride enwrapped silver grafted on nitrogen-doped reduced graphene oxide as a highly efficient visible-light-driven photocatalyst. J Colloid Interface Sci 505:421–429.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2017.06.037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wu Y, Luo H, Zhang L (2015) Pd nanoparticles supported on MIL-101/reduced graphene oxide photocatalyst: an efficient and recyclable photocatalyst for triphenylmethane dye degradation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:17238–17243.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5364-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wu H, Lin S, Chen C, Liang W, Liu X, Yang H (2016) A new ZnO/rGO/polyaniline ternary nanocomposite as photocatalyst with improved photocatalytic activity. Mater Res Bull 83:434–441.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2016.06.036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Xu J, Ao Y, Chen M (2013) A simple method for the preparation of Bi2WO6-reduced grapheme oxide with enhanced photocatalytic activity under visible light irradiation. Mater Lett 92:126–128.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2012.10.038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Xu T, Hu J, Yang Y, Que W, Yin X, Wu H, Chen L (2018) Ternary system of ZnO nanorods/reduced graphene oxide/CuInS2 quantum dots for enhanced photocatalytic performance. J Alloys Compd 734:196–203.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.10.275 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Yang Y, Zhang W, Liu R, Cui J, Deng C (2018) Preparation and photocatalytic properties of visible light driven Ag-AgBr-RGO composite. Sep Purif Technol 190:278–287.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2017.09.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Yao S, Xu L, Gao Q, Wang X, Kong N, Li W, Wang J, Li G, Pu X (2017) Enhanced photocatalytic degradation of Rhodamine B by reduced graphene oxides wrapped-Cu2SnS3 flower-like architectures. J Alloys Compd 704:469–477.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.02.069 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Yousefi R, Azimi HR, Mahmoudian MR, Basirun WJ (2018a) The effect of defect emissions on enhancement photocatalytic performance of ZnSe QDs and ZnSe/rGO nanocomposites. Appl Surf Sci 435:886–893.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.11.183 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Yousefi R, Azimi HR, Mahmoudian MR, Cheraghizade M (2018b) Highly enhanced photocatalytic performance of Zn(1-x)MgxO/rGO nanostars under sunlight irradiation synthesized by one-pot refluxing method. Adv Powder Technol 29:78–85.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2017.10.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Yu W, Chen X, Mei W, Chen C, Tsang Y (2017) Photocatalytic and electrochemical performance of three-dimensional reduced graphene oxide/WS2/Mg-doped ZnO composites. Appl Surf Sci 400:129–138.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.12.138 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Žerjav G, Djinović P, Pintar A (2018) TiO2-Bi2O3/(BiO)2CO3-reduced graphene oxide composite as an effective visible light photocatalyst for degradation of aqueous bisphenol A solutions. Catal Today 315:237–246.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2018.02.039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Zhang D, Yang X, Zhu J, Zhang Y, Zhang P, Li G (2011) Graphite-like carbon deposited anatase TiO2 single crystals as efficient visible-light photocatalysts. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 58:594–601.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-011-2433-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Zhang L, Li N, Jiu H, Zhang Q (2016) Solvothermal synthesis of reduced graphene oxide-Bi2S3 nanorod composites with enhanced photocatalytic activity under visible light irradiation. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 27:2748–2753.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-015-4086-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zhang L, Wang A, Zhu N, Sun B, Liang Y, Wu W (2018a) Synthesis of butterfly-like BiVO4/RGO nanocomposites and their photocatalytic activities. Chin J Chem Eng 26:667–674.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2017.09.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Zhang Y, Yang HM, Park SJ (2018b) Synthesis and characterization of nitrogen-doped TiO2 coatings on reduced graphene oxide for enhancing the visible light photocatalytic activity. Curr Appl Phys 18:163–169.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cap.2017.12.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Zhang F, Zhang Y, Zhang G, Yang Z, Dionysiou DD, Zhu A (2018c) Exceptional synergistic enhancement of the photocatalytic activity of SnS2 by coupling with polyaniline and N-doped reduced graphene oxide. Appl Catal B Environ 236:53–63.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.05.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Zhou M, Han D, Liu X, Ma C, Wang H, Tang Y, Huo P, Shi W, Yan Y, Yang J (2015) Enhanced visible light photocatalytic activity of alkaline earth metal ions-doped CdSe/rGO photocatalysts synthesized by hydrothermal method. Appl Catal B-Environ 172–173:174–184.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.01.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Zhu L, Ye S, Ali A, Ulla K, Cho KY, Oh WC (2015) Modified hydrothermal synthesis and characterization of reduced graphene oxide-silver selenide nanocomposites with enhanced reactive oxygen species generation. Chin J Catal 36:603–611.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-2067(14)60275-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Zhu J, Zhu Z, Zhang H, Lu H, Zhang W, Qiu Y, Zhu L, Küppers S (2018) Calcined layered double hydroxides/reduced graphene oxide composites with improved photocatalytic degradation of paracetamol and efficient oxidation-adsorption of As(III). Appl Catal B-Environ 225:550–562.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.12.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Zou L, Wangn X, Xu X, Wang H (2016) Reduced grapheme oxide wrapped CdS composites with enhanced photocatalytic performance and high stability. Ceram Int 42:372–378.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.08.119 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Zou X, Zhou Y, Wang Z, Chen S, Xiang B, Qiang Y, Zhu S (2018) Facile synthesis of α-Fe2O3 pyramid on reduced graphene oxide for supercapacitor and photo-degradation. J Alloys Compd 744:412–420.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.02.126 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Suresh
    • 1
  • R. V. Mangalaraja
    • 2
    • 5
  • Héctor D. Mansilla
    • 3
  • Paola Santander
    • 4
    • 6
  • Jorge Yáñez
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Analytical and Inorganic Chemistry, Faculty of Chemical SciencesUniversity of ConcepciónConcepciónChile
  2. 2.Department of Materials Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringUniversity of ConcepciónConcepciónChile
  3. 3.Department of Organic Chemistry, Faculty of Chemical SciencesUniversity of ConcepciónConcepciónChile
  4. 4.Center of BiotechnologyUniversity of ConcepciónConcepciónChile
  5. 5.Technological Development Unit (UDT)University of Concepcion, Coronel Industrial ParkCoronelChile
  6. 6.Millenium Nuclei on Catalytic Processes towards Sustainable Chemistry (CSC)ConcepciónChile

Personalised recommendations