Nanoparticles based Surface Plasmon Enhanced Photocatalysis

  • Mohammad Ehtisham KhanEmail author
  • Akbar Mohammad
  • Moo Hwan ChoEmail author
Part of the Environmental Chemistry for a Sustainable World book series (ECSW, volume 34)


Surface plasmonic resonance (SPR)-centered photocatalysts have helped to improve photocatalytic effectiveness for energy- and environmental-related applications, such as wastewater treatment and water splitting. The SPR phenomenon has been well studied in noble metal-based nanoparticles, such as Ag and Au, to achieve an efficient photocatalytic process, particularly for wastewater treatment. SPR-based nanostructures may involve plasmon-facilitated photocatalytic reaction mechanisms, such as Schottky junctions, through electron transfer, improved limited electric fields, and plasmon resonance-based energy transference. This chapter reviews the various factors that are involved in the photodegradation of dyes. A discussion on future directions within this field of investigation is also provided.


Surface plasmon resonance Metal nanoparticles Au and Ag Visible light Photocatalysis Wastewater treatment 



This study was supported by the Priority Research Centers Program (Grant No. 2014R1A6A1031189) through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Korean Ministry of Education.


  1. Armelao L et al (2006) Recent trends on nanocomposites based on Cu, Ag and Au clusters: a closer look. Coord Chem Rev 250(11–12):1294–1314. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atwater HA, Polman A (2010) Plasmonics for improved photovoltaic devices. Nat Mater 9(3):205. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bai S et al (2015) Toward enhanced photocatalytic oxygen evolution: synergetic utilization of plasmonic effect and schottky junction via interfacing facet selection. Adv Mater 27(22):3444–3452. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Camarero L et al (2003) Photo-assisted oxidation of indigocarmine in an acid medium. Environ Eng Sci 20(4):281–287. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Daneshvar N, Salari D, Khataee AR (2004) Photocatalytic degradation of azo dye acid red 14 in water on ZnO as an alternative catalyst to TiO2. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 162(2–3):317–322. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Daniel M-C, Astruc D (2004) Gold nanoparticles: assembly, supramolecular chemistry, quantum-size-related properties, and applications toward biology, catalysis, and nanotechnology. Chem Rev 104(1):293–346. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fujishima A, Honda K (1972) Electrochemical photolysis of water at a semiconductor electrode. Nature 238(5358):37. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. García MA (2011) Surface plasmons in metallic nanoparticles: fundamentals and applications. J Phys D Appl Phys 44(28):283001. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gramotnev DK, Bozhevolnyi SI (2010) Plasmonics beyond the diffraction limit. Nat Photonics 4(2):83. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Guo S, Wang E (2011) Noble metal nanomaterials: controllable synthesis and application in fuel cells and analytical sensors. Nano Today 6(3):240–264. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hou W, Cronin SB (2013) A review of surface plasmon resonance-enhanced photocatalysis. Adv Funct Mater 23(13):1612–1619. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jiang R et al (2014) Metal/semiconductor hybrid nanostructures for plasmon-enhanced applications. Adv Mater 26(31):5274–5309. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jing L et al (2013) Surface tuning for oxide-based nanomaterials as efficient photocatalysts. Chem Soc Rev 42(24):9509–9549. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Khan ME, Khan MM, Cho MH (2015a) Biogenic synthesis of a Ag–graphene nanocomposite with efficient photocatalytic degradation, electrical conductivity and photoelectrochemical performance. New J Chem 39(10):8121–8129. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Khan ME, Khan MM, Cho MH (2015b) Green synthesis, photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical performance of an Au–Graphene nanocomposite. RSC Adv 5(34):26897–26904. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Khan ME, Khan MM, Cho MH (2016) CdS-graphene nanocomposite for efficient visible-light-driven photocatalytic andphotoelectrochemical applications. J Colloid Interface Sci 482:221–232. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Khan ME, Khan MM, Cho MH (2017) Ce3+-ion, surface oxygen vacancy, and visible light-induced photocatalytic dye degradation and photocapacitive performance of CeO2-graphene nanostructures. Sci Rep 7(1):5928. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Khan ME, Khan MM, Cho MH (2018) Recent progress of metal-graphene nanostructures in photocatalysis. Nanoscale 10:9427–9440. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kim K-H, Husakou A, Herrmann J (2010) Linear and nonlinear optical characteristics of composites containing metal nanoparticles with different sizes and shapes. Opt Express 18(7):7488–7496. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kreibig U, Vollmer M (1995) Theoretical considerations. In: Optical properties of metal clusters. Springer, Berlin, pp 13–201. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Le F et al (2008) Metallic nanoparticle arrays: a common substrate for both surface-enhanced Raman scattering and surface-enhanced infrared absorption. ACS Nano 2(4):707–718. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lim PY et al (2006) Synthesis of ag nanospheres particles in ethylene glycol by electrochemical-assisted polyol process. Chem Phys Lett 420(4–6):304–308. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Linic S, Christopher P, Ingram DB (2011) Plasmonic-metal nanostructures for efficient conversion of solar to chemical energy. Nat Mater 10(12):911. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Maier, SA (2007). Plasmonics: fundamentals and applications. Springer. New York. ISBN: 9780387331508. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mock JJ et al (2002) Shape effects in plasmon resonance of individual colloidal silver nanoparticles. J Chem Phys 116(15):6755–6759. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Moores A, Goettmann F (2006) The plasmon band in noble metal nanoparticles: an introduction to theory and applications. New J Chem 30(8):1121–1132. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Murray RW (2008) Nanoelectrochemistry: metal nanoparticles, nanoelectrodes, and nanopores. Chem Rev 108(7):2688–2720. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Naushad M, Abdullah ALOthman Z, Rabiul Awual M et al (2016) Adsorption of rose Bengal dye from aqueous solution by amberlite Ira-938 resin: kinetics, isotherms, and thermodynamic studies. Desalin Water Treat 57:13527–13533. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pathania D, Gupta D, Al-Muhtaseb AH et al (2016) Photocatalytic degradation of highly toxic dyes using chitosan-g-poly(acrylamide)/ZnS in presence of solar irradiation. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 329:61–68. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Qu X, Alvarez PJJ, Li Q (2013) Applications of nanotechnology in water and wastewater treatment. Water Res 47(12):3931–3946. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rayalu SS et al (2013) Photocatalytic water splitting on Au/TiO2 nanocomposites synthesized through various routes: enhancement in photocatalytic activity due to SPR effect. Appl Catal B Environ 142:684–693. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Saravanan R, Karthikeyan N, Gupta VK, Thangadurai P, Narayanan V, Stephen A (2013) ZnO/Ag nanocomposite: an efficient catalyst for degradation studies of textile effluents under visible light. Mater Sci Eng C 33:2235–2244. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Saravanan R, Manoj D, Qin J, Naushad M, Gracia F, Lee AF, MansoobKhan MM, Gracia-Pinilla MA (2018) Mechanothermal synthesis of Ag/TiO2 for photocatalytic methyl orange degradation and hydrogen production. Process Saf Environ Prot 120:339–347. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sarina S, Waclawik ER, Zhu H (2013) Photocatalysis on supported gold and silver nanoparticles under ultraviolet and visible light irradiation. Green Chem 15(7):1814–1833. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sharma VK, Yngard RA, Lin Y (2009) Silver nanoparticles: green synthesis and their antimicrobial activities. Adv Colloid Interf Sci 145(1–2):83–96. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sharma G, Kumar A, Naushad M et al (2017) Photoremediation of toxic dye from aqueous environment using monometallic and bimetallic quantum dots based nanocomposites. J Clean Prod. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Su K-H et al (2003) Interparticle coupling effects on plasmon resonances of nanogold particles. Nano Lett 3(8):1087–1090. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Su YH et al (2007) Layer-by-layer au nanoparticles as a Schottky barrier in a water-based dye-sensitized solar cell. Appl Phys A 88(1):173–178. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sun Y, Xia Y (2002) Shape-controlled synthesis of gold and silver nanoparticles. Science 298(5601):2176–2179. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wang JL, Xu LJ (2012) Advanced oxidation processes for wastewater treatment: formation of hydroxyl radical and application. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 42(3):251–325. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wang P et al (2012) Plasmonic photocatalysts: harvesting visible light with noble metal nanoparticles. Phys Chem Chem Phys 14(28):9813–9825. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Warren SC, Thimsen E (2012) Plasmonic solar water splitting. Energy Environ Sci 5(1):5133–5146. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Xia Y, Halas NJ (2005) Shape-controlled synthesis and surface plasmonic properties of metallic nanostructures. MRS Bull 30(5):338–348. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Xu Y, Schoonen MAA (2000) The absolute energy positions of conduction and valence bands of selected semiconducting minerals. Am Mineral 85(3–4):543–556. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zarazua I et al (2016) Effect of the electrophoretic deposition of Au NPs in the performance CdS QDs sensitized solar cells. Electrochim Acta 188:710–717. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zhang N, Liu S, Xu Y-J (2012) Recent progress on metal core@semiconductor shell nanocomposites as a promising type of photocatalyst. Nanoscale 4(7):2227–2238. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zhang X et al (2013) Plasmonic photocatalysis. Rep Prog Phys 76(4):046401. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zhang J et al (2014) Self-assembly of a Ag nanoparticle-modified and graphene-wrapped TiO2 nanobelt ternary heterostructure: surface charge tuning toward efficient photocatalysis. Nanoscale 6(19):11293–11302. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zhou X et al (2012) Surface plasmon resonance-mediated photocatalysis by noble metal-based composites under visible light. J Mater Chem 22(40):21337–21354. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemical Engineering and Technology, College of Applied Industrial Technology (CAIT)Jazan UniversityJazanKingdom of Saudi Arabia
  2. 2.School of Chemical EngineeringYeungnam UniversityGyeongsan-siSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations