Advertisement

Leadership and Management Styles: Typological Approach to Personal Resources of Change Management

  • V. G. Gryazeva-Dobshinskaya
  • Y. A. DmitrievaEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 138)

Abstract

Based on the analysis of the results of research into innovative leadership among managers, we address the problem of the relationship between leadership styles and managerial strategies of managers. We look at the relevance of using the typological approach in assessing the leaders’ and managerial resources of the subjects. For our study, we used the MLQ questionnaire by B. Bass, B. Avolio and MSI questionnaire by I. Adizes on 254 managers working at several enterprises of the industrial holding company with various modernization conditions. We presented the results of the implementation of the typological approach to the differentiation of subjects by personal resources: the level of transformational or transactional leadership, the level of expression of strategies aimed at results or effectiveness. We conducted a comparative analysis of 7 typologies obtained, the accuracy of grouping subjects into which varies from 81.9 to 97.2%. We determined the optimal model of personal resources of change management by the ratio of 4 indicators: transformational and transactional leadership, strategies aimed at results and efficiency. This model implies a differentiation of managers into 16 subgroups. We identified the contributions of strategies and leadership styles of managers and determined the development prospects of human resources at each enterprise.

Keywords

Typological approach Innovative leadership Transformational leadership Leadership styles Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ) Management styles Managerial strategies 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The work was supported by Act 211 Government of the Russian Federation, contract № 02.A03.21.0011.

References

  1. 1.
    Adizes, I.K.: Stili menedzhmenta: ehffektivnye i neehffektivnye. Al’pina Biznes Buks, Moskva (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aleksandrov, I.O.: Formirovanie struktury individual’nogo znaniya. Izdatel’stvo Institut psikhologii RAN, Moskva (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Amabajl, T.: Kak ubit’ tvorcheskuyu initsiativu. Kreativnoe myshle-nie v biznese. Al’pina Biznes Buks, Moskva (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Artemtseva, N.G., Grekova, T.N., Nagibina, N.L.: Psikhologiya iskusstva: tipologicheskij podkhod. RIO MGUDT, Moskva (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Asmolov, A.G., Petrovskij, V.A.: O dinamicheskom podkhode k psikhologichekomu analizu deyatel’nosti. Voprosy psikhologii 1, 70–80 (1978)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Asmolov, A.G., Soldatova, G.U., SHajgerova, L.A.: O smyslakh ponyatiya «tolerantnost’» . Vek tolerantnosti: nauchno-publitsisticheskij vestnik. Izda-tel’stvo MGU, Moskva, pp. 8–18 (2001)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Avolio, B.J.: Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Third Edition Manual and Sampler Set. Published by Mind Garden. https://www.mindgarden.com/Inc
  8. 8.
    Avolio, B.J.: Re-examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol., 441–462 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bennis, W. Nanus B.: Leaders: The strategies for Taking Charge. Harper & Row, New York (1985)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bennis, W.: Why Leaders Can’t Lead. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (1989)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Birasnav, M. Rangnekar, S. Dalpati, A.: Transformational leadership, interim leadership, and employee human capital benefits: an empirical study. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci., 1037–1042 (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chiksentmikhaji, M.: Kreativnost’. Potok i psikhologiya otkrytij i izobretenij. Kar’era Press, Moskva (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Csikszentmihalyi, M., Robinson, R.: Culture, Time, and Development of Talent. Conceptions of Giftedness, pp. 264–284. University Press, Cambridge (1986)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fisher, G.: Razvitie sotsial’noj kreativnosti: pust’ vse golosa budut uslyshany. Psikhologiya. ZHurnal Vysshej shkoly ehkonomiki 2(4), 57–64 (2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Florida, R.: Kreativnyj klass: lyudi, kotorye menyayut budushhee. Klassika-KHKH1, Moskva (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Goldstajn, D., Kreger, O.: Tvorcheskaya lichnost’: kak ispol’zovat’ sil’nye storony svoego kharaktera dlya razvitiya kreativnosti. Mann, Ivanov i Ferber, Moskva (2014)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gryazeva-Dobshinskaya, V.G.: Innovatsionnoe liderstvo: modelirovanie tendentsij aktivnosti menedzherov predpriyatiya. Vestnik YUUrGU. Seriya «Psikhologiya» 9, 9–17 (2010)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gryazeva-Dobshinskaya, V.G.: Sinergiya vzaimodejstviya sub”ektov v sovmestnoj tvorcheskoj deyatel’nosti kak mekhanizm tvorcheskogo liderstva. Psikhologiya intellekta i tvorchestva: Traditsii i innovatsii. Izdatel’stvo Institut psikhologii RAN, Moskva, pp 298–308 (2010)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gryazeva-Dobshinskaya, V.G.: Tolerantnost’ sub”ektov tvorcheskoj i innovatsionnoj deyatel’nosti kak sotsio-kul’turnyj kapital innovatsij predpriyatij. Vestnik YUUrGU. Seriya «Psikhologiya» , 15, pp. 17–24 (2011)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gryazeva-Dobshinskaya, V.G., Dmitrieva, Y.U.A., Glukhova, V.A.: Resur-sy innovatsionnogo liderstva menedzherov: psikhologicheskij innovatsionnyj audit. Izdatel’skij tsentr YUUrGU, CHelyabinsk (2016)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jin, S., Seo, M., Shapiro, D.L.: Do happy leaders lead better? affective and attitudinal antecedents of transformational leadership. Leadersh. Quart. 27, 64–84 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kanste, O., Miettunen, J., Kyngas, H.: Psychometric properties of the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire among nurses. J. Adv. Nurs. 57(2), 201–212 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kornilova, T.V.: Intellektual’no-lichnostnyj potentsial cheloveka v usloviyakh neopredelennosti i riska. Nestor-Istoriya, Moskva (2016)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kotter, J.P.: A Force for Change: How Leadership Differs from Management. The Free Press, New York (1990)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Libin, A.V.: Differentsial’naya psikhologiya: na peresechenii evropejskikh, rossijskikh i amerikanskikh traditsij. Smysl, Moskva (1999)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Majers, I.: Briggs MBTI: opredelenie tipov. U kazhdogo svoj dar. Kar’era Press, Moskva (2014)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Merlin, V.S.: Ocherk integral’nogo issledovaniya individual’nosti. Pedagogika, Moskva (1986)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mirkmali, S.M., Thani, F.N., Alami, F.: Examining the role of transformational leadership and job satisfaction in the organizational learning of an automotive manufacturing company. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 29, 139–148 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sobchik, L.N.: Psikhologiya individual’nosti. Teoriya i praktika psikhodiagnostiki. Idatel’stvo «Rech’» . Sankt-Petergburg (2008)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tejeda, M.J.: The MLQ revisited Psychometric properties and recommendations. Leadersh. Quart. 12, 31–52 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tyutyunov, K.: Proekty. Rabochaya tetrad’. Mini – MBA: prakticheskie znaniya dlya razvitiya biznesa. Russkaya shkola upravleniya, Moskva (2008)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ushakov, D.V.: Sovremennye issledovaniya tvorchestva. Psikhologiya. ZHurnal Vysshej shkoly ehkonomiki 2(4), 53–56 (2005)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Vyatkin, B.A., Shukin, M.R.: Novyj podkhod k issledovaniyu stilya v nauchnoj shkole V.S. Merlina. Psikhologiya integral’noj individual’nosti: Permskaya shkola. Smysl, Moskva, pp. 219–232 (2011)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Yildirim, N., Birinci, S.: Impacts of organizational culture and leadership on business performance: a case study on acquisitions. In: 2nd International Conference on Leadership, Technology and Innovation Management, Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, pp. 71–82 (2013)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zhuravlev, A.L., Ushakov, D.V.: Teoretiko-ehksperimental’naya i prakticheskaya psikhologii. Paradigmy v psikhologii: naukovedcheskij analiz. Izdatel’stvo Institut psikhologii RAN, Moskva, pp. 158–177 (2012)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zhurin, Yu.N.: Liderstvo. Rabochaya tetrad’. Mini – MBA: praktiche-skie znaniya dlya razvitiya biznesa. Russkaya shkola upravleniya, Moskva (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. G. Gryazeva-Dobshinskaya
    • 1
  • Y. A. Dmitrieva
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.South Ural State UniversityChelyabinskRussia

Personalised recommendations