Advertisement

Case Studies with Central Asian Soils

  • Kodoth Prabhakaran Nair
Chapter

Abstract

The chapter discusses, at length, the importance of the precise determination of Zinc buffer power in wheat cultivation in Central Asia (Turkey, in the wheat belt, Anatolia). The results clearly demonstrate the scientific inadequacy of the commonly used soil test for Zinc bio availability – the DTPA test – in the Anatolia region, and, unequivocally demonstrate how the buffer power concept has been able to enormously help the wheat farmers of the region with regard to Zinc fertilizer application, who have been wasting their monetary resources on unscientific fertilizer application, for example, as much as 100 kg ZnSO4/ha.

Keywords

Zinc buffer power Turkey Wheat 

References

  1. Cavdar, A. O., Arcasoy, A., Cin, S., Babacan, E., & Gozdasoglu, S. (1983). Geophagia in Turkey: Iron and zinc deficiency, iron and zinc absorption studies and response to treatment with zinc in geophagia cases. In Zinc deficiency in human subjects (pp. 71–79). New York: Alan R. Liss. Inc.Google Scholar
  2. Graham, R. D., & Rengel, Z. (1993). Genotypic variation in zinc uptake and utilization by plants. In A. D. Robson (Ed.), Zinc in Soils and Plants (pp. 107–118). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Graham, R. D., & Welch, R. M. (1994). Breeding for staple – Food crops with high micronutrient density: Long-term sustainable agricultural solutions to hidden hunger in developing countries. In IFPRI workshop on food policy and agricultural technology to improve diet quality and nutrition. Annapolis, Maryland, January 10–12Google Scholar
  4. Nair, K. P. P. (1984a). Towards a better approach to soil testing based on the buffer power concept. In Proceeding of 6th International colloquium for the optimization of plant nutrition (Vol. 4, pp. 1221–1228), 2–8 September, Pierre-Martin Prevel, Montpellier, France.Google Scholar
  5. Nair, K. P. P. (1984b). Zinc buffer power as an important criterion for a dependable assessment of plant uptake. Plant and Soil, 81, 209–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Nair, K. P. P. (1992). Measuring P buffer power to improve routine soil testing for phosphate. European Journal of Agronomy, 1(2), 79–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Nair, K. P. P. (1996). The buffering power of plant nutrients and effects on availability. Advances in Agronomy, 57, 237–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Prasad, A. S. (1982). History of zinc in human nutrition. In A. S. Prasad, I. E. Dreosti, & B. S. Hetzel (Eds.), Clinical applications of recent advances in zinc metabolism (pp. 1–17). New York: Alan R Liss Inc.Google Scholar
  9. Sillanpaa, M. (1982). Micronuttrients and the nutrient status of soils. A global study (FAO Soils Bulletin, No. 48). Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
  10. Sillanpaa, M., & Vlek, P. L. G. (1985). Micronutrients and the agroecology of tropical and Mediterranean regions. Fertilizer Research, 7, 151–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Welch, R. M. (1993). Zinc concentrations and forms in plants for humans and animals. In A. D. Robson (Ed.), Zinc in soils and plants (pp. 183–195). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kodoth Prabhakaran Nair
    • 1
  1. 1.International Agricultural Scientistc/o Mavila PankajakshyCalicutIndia

Personalised recommendations