Advertisement

Technology and Innovation

  • Nikita Joshi
  • Teresa Roman-Micek
Chapter
Part of the Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation book series (CHS)

Abstract

This chapter on technology and innovation will cover the types of tools and techniques that can be used to build upon, enhance, or create new simulation training tools or devices and how they are used. If it is found that a tool or product does not meet a specific training need, it is often the job of the healthcare simulation technology specialist (HSTS) to engineer and design a solution. It is important to remember that just because a commercial product exists, it does not mean that it will meet the needs for all learners or educators. Of course, even commercial products started as prototype designs to meet an unmet need. The chapter will conclude with a description of many common household and industrial supplies that have been previously used in simulation centers, a discussion of how to use them, and considerations for their incorporation into product design or daily use.

Keywords

Design Innovation Tools Materials Adhesives Solvents Silicone Polymers 

References

  1. 1.
    Stunt J, Wulms P, Kerkhoffs G, Dankelman J, Van Dijk C, Tuijthof GJM. How valid are commercially available medical simulators? Adv Med Educ Pract. 2014;5:385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    United States Navy. Naval Education and Training Command Integrated Learning Environment Course Development and Life-Cycle Maintenance [Online]; http://www.netc.navy.mil/ile/_Documents/NAVEDTRA136/NAVEDTRA_136.pdf; 2010. Available from: http://www.netc.navy.mil/ile/_Documents/NAVEDTRA136/NAVEDTRA_136.pdf
  3. 3.
    Kern D, Thomas P, Hughes M, editors. Curriculum development for medical education: a six-step approach. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2009.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Molenda M. In search of the elusive ADDIE model. Perform Improv. 2003;42(5):34–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Smith A. Simulation vendors. In: Crawford S, editor. Halldale Media, Publisher of Medical Training Magazine; 2018.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brown T. Change by design: how design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. New York: HarperCollins; 2009.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bustamante S, Bose S, Bishop P, Klatte R, Norris FJ. Novel application of rapid prototyping for simulation of bronchoscopic anatomy. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2014;28(4):1122–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wikipedia. Maker culture. Wikipedia [Internet]; August 30, 2018. Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maker_culture
  9. 9.
    Dam R, Siang T. 5 stages in the design thinking process; August 30, 2018. Available from: https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/5-stages-in-the-design-thinking-process.
  10. 10.
    Saxon KD, Kapadia AP, Juneja NS, Bassin BS. How to teach emergency procedural skills in an outdoor environment using low-fidelity simulation. Wilderness Environ Med. 2014;25(1):50–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ching JA, Wachtel TL. A simple device to teach tube thoracostomy. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2011;70(6):1564–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hamstra SJ, Brydges R, Hatala R, Zendejas B, Cook DA. Reconsidering fidelity in simulation-based training. Acad Med. 2014;89(3):387–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schoenherr JR, Hamstra SJ. Beyond fidelity: deconstructing the seductive simplicity of fidelity in simulator-based education in the health care professions. Simul Healthc. 2017;12(2):117–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kulyk P, Olszynski PA. Emergency Department Ultrasound Simulator: 35. Acad Emerg Med. 2012;19:S409–S10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Heiner JD. A new simulation model for skin abscess identification and management. Simul Healthc. 2010;5(4):238–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nachshon A, Mitchell JD, Mueller A, Banner-Goodspeed VM, McSparron JI. Expert evaluation of a chicken tissue-based model for teaching ultrasound-guided central venous catheter insertion. J Educ Perioper Med. 2017;19(1):E503.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pettineo CM, Vozenilek JA, Wang E, Flaherty J, Kharasch M, Aitchison P. Simulated emergency department procedures with minimal monetary investment: cricothyrotomy simulator. Simul Healthc. 2009;4(1):60–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Coleman K, Fortuna T, Kuehl D. A novel eye model for simulation in slit lamp examination, ultrasound and foreign body removal using animal tissue. West J Emerg Med. 2017;18(5.1)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bousquet J, Flahault A, Vandenplas O, Ameille J, Duron J-J, Pecquet C, et al. Natural rubber latex allergy among health care workers: a systematic review of the evidence. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006;118(2):447–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Alumilite. Alumilite mold making and casting materials [Online] https://www.alumilite.com/. Available from: https://www.alumilite.com/
  21. 21.
    Smooth-On. Mind blowing materials for a world of applications [Online] https://www.smooth-on.com/. Available from: https://www.smooth-on.com/
  22. 22.
    Pierce N, Jackson C. Project AIMMEE: a Cross-Continental SimulaitionBuild. Peoria: SimGHOSTS USA; 2016.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Artmolds.com. Chavant – NSP Plasteline Clay – Green [Online]; https://www.artmolds.com/chavant-nsp-plasteline-clay-green.html; August 30, 2018. Available from https://www.artmolds.com/chavant-nsp-plasteline-clay-green.html.
  24. 24.
    Fairchild JM. Versatile Uses for alginate impression material. J Prosthet Dent. 1974;31(3):266–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Smooth-On. Can A Rubber mold that has torn in production be repaired? [Online]. https://www.smooth-on.com/support/faq/98/: Smooth-On; Available from: https://www.smooth-on.com/support/faq/98/
  26. 26.
    Lewis LA, Nusbaum BP, Leeds HR. Simulated skin and method. Google Patents; 1986.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    ATSDR. Public Health Statement for Tin. Toxic Substances Portal [Internet]; 2005. Available from: https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/phs/phs.asp?id=541&tid=98.
  28. 28.
    Kendall JL, Faragher JP. Ultrasound-guided central venous access: a homemade phantom for simulation. Can J Emerg Med. 2007;9(5):371–3.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Morrow DS, Broder J. Cost-effective, reusable, leak-resistant ultrasound-guided vascular access trainer. J Emerg Med. 2015;49(3):313–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Fackler ML, Malinowski JA. Ordnance gelatin for ballistic studies. Detrimental effect of excess heat used in gelatin preparation. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 1988;9(3):218–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ploch CC, Mansi CS, Jayamohan J, Kuhl EJ. Using 3D printing to create personalized brain models for neurosurgical training and preoperative planning. World Neurosurg. 2016;90:668–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Vieira SL, Pavan TZ, Junior JE, Carneiro A. Paraffin-gel tissue-mimicking material for ultrasound-guided needle biopsy phantom. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2013;39(12):2477–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rengier F, Mehndiratta A, Von Tengg-Kobligk H, Zechmann CM, Unterhinninghofen R, Kauczor H-U, et al. 3D printing based on imaging data: review of medical applications. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2010;5(4):335–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Chimento J, Jason Highsmith M, Crane N. 3D printed tooling for thermoforming of medical devices. Rapid Prototyp J. 2011;17(5):387–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Pryor WJ. Injection molding of plastics for dentures. J Am Dent Assoc. 1942;29(11):1400–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Throne JL. Thermoforming. In: Encyclopedia of polymer science technology; 2002.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    O’Reilly M, Hoffmann S, Hess L, Peterson-Perry S, Martin A, editors. Low-tech, High-fidelity Models for a Robust Ultrasound Curriculum. Council on Resident Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology (CREOG) and the Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics (APGO) Annual Meeting; 2017; Orlando.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Glover T. Pocket ref. 4th ed. Littleton: Sequoia Publishing, Inc.; 2010.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    AdCo. Proflex 970 hot melt glue sticks; 2011. Available from: https://www.westmerciasupplies.co.uk/media/catalog/PDF/COSHH/80051.pdf
  40. 40.
    DAP Products Inc. Safety data sheet – original contact cement bottle [Online]. http://www.dap.com/media/52165/00030202001english.pdf; 2015. Report No.: 00030202001.
  41. 41.
    3M. Material safety data sheet 3m(TM) Rubber & Vinyl 80 Spray Adhesive [Online]. http://www.layogev.co.il/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/3M-%d7%aa%d7%a8%d7%a1%d7%99%d7%a1-%d7%93%d7%91%d7%a7-801.pdf, Division IAaT; 2011.
  42. 42.
    Elmer’s Products, Inc. Safety data sheet – Elmer’s No-Wrinkle Rubber Cement [Online]. http://www.elmers.com/docs/default-source/sds%27s-(safety-data-sheets)/se904.pdf?sfvrsn=2; October 21, 2016. Contract No.: SDS-34.
  43. 43.
    Wilsonart LLC. Material safety data sheet – Wilsonart PVA wood Glue Series [Online]. https://www.wilsonart.com/sites/default/files/docs/resources/technical-information-msds-wilsonart-pva-wood-glue-series.pdf; April 20, 2015. Contract No.: 19023.
  44. 44.
    Puttlitz KJ, Stalter KA. Handbook of lead-free solder technology for microelectronic assemblies. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Durkee J. Cleaning with solvents: science and technology. Oxford: William Andrew; 2013.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Schramm LL. Surfactants: fundamentals and applications in the petroleum industry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Lecat P, Cropp E, McCord G, Haller NA. Ethanol-based cleanser versus isopropyl alcohol to decontaminate stethoscopes. Am J Infect Control. 2009;37(3):241–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Kumai M, Koizumi A, Saito K, Sakurai H, Inoue T, Takeuchi Y, et al. A nationwide survey on organic solvent components in various solvent products. Ind Health. 1983;21(3):185–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Barr WM. Material safety data sheet – Goo Off Heavy Duty [Online]. https://goofoffproducts.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/HeavyDutyRemoverMSDS.pdf; April 16, 2015.
  50. 50.
    ATSDR. Toluene. Toxic Substances Portal [Internet]; 2011, August 30, 2018. Available from: https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/substances/toxsubstance.asp?toxid=29
  51. 51.
    ATSDR. Medical management guidelines for Xylene. Toxic Substances Portal [Internet]; 2014 August 30, 2018. Available from: https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/mmg/mmg.asp?id=291&tid=53 - bookmark01.
  52. 52.
    Gojo Industries Inc. Material safety data sheet – GOJO® ORIGINAL FORMULA™ Hand Cleaner. Gojo Industries, Inc.; 2018. Contract No.: 400000000198.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    New England Fabric and Foam. Foam-fit-function [Online]. http://www.newenglandfoam.com/.Available from: http://www.newenglandfoam.com/
  54. 54.
    Merica BJ. Medical moulage: how to make your simulations come alive. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Company; 2011.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Engineers NBoC. Handbook on pet film and sheets, urethane foams, flexible foams, ridgif foams: Asia Pacific Business Press; 2018.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Cornell J. The 6 best things about memory foam matress: Lulu Press, Inc; 2015.Google Scholar
  57. 57.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nikita Joshi
    • 1
  • Teresa Roman-Micek
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Emergency MedicineAlameda Health SystemOaklandUSA
  2. 2.Center for Immersive and Simulation-Based LearningStanford University School of MedicineStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations