Advertisement

Societal, Public, and [Emotional] Epidemiological Aspects of a Pandemic

  • Christy Duan
  • Howard Linder
  • Damir Huremović
Chapter

Abstract

Behavior contagion in social psychology studies collective behavior under certain (usually stressful) circumstances and propagation of attitudes, emotional responses, and behaviors in anxiety-ridden situations. It is of great importance to understand how behavior contagion can herald, mirror, and match the actual physical contagion of an infectious illness in an outbreak. “Emotional epidemiology” is a term increasingly used to describe studying the emotional and cognitive-behavioral aspects of a pandemic. Utilizing facts and reliable epidemiological models in public communication is an important step toward extinguishing the anxiety-inducing uncertainties, rumors, and speculations. This chapter, at the end, includes a glossary of terms that will allow mental health professionals to converse competently with infectious disease colleagues, and also help relay that information to the general public.

Keywords

Contagion theory Gustave Le Bon Emotional contagion Mass hysteria Emotional epidemiology 

References

  1. 1.
    Marsden P. Memetics & social contagion: two sides of the same coin? J Memet Evol Model Inf Transm. 1998;2:171–85.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stephenson GM, Fielding GT. An experimental study of the contagion of leaving behavior in small gatherings. J Soc Psychol. 1971;84(1):81–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wheeler L. Toward a theory of behavioral contagion. Psychol Rev. 1966;73(2):179–92.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0023023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hatfield E, Cacioppo JT, Rapson RL. Emotional contagion. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. June 1993;2(3):96–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kerckhoff AC, Back KW. The June Bug: a study of hysterical contagion. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1968.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ofri D. The emotional epidemiology of H1N1 influenza vaccination. N Engl J Med. 2009;36(27):2594–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Johnson T. Medicine and the media. New Engl J Med. 1998;339(2):87–92.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Graunt J. Natural and political. 5th ed. London: John Martyn\Royal Society.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Morabia A. Epidemiology’s 350th anniversary: 1662–2012. Epidimiology. 2013;24(2):179–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wood MJ. Propagating and debunking conspiracy theories on twitter during the 2015–2016 Zika virus outbreak. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2018;21(8):485–90.  https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2017.0669. Epub 2018 Jul 18. PMID: 30020821.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    The Institute for Disease Modeling. http://www.idmod.org/home. Accessed Oct 2018.
  12. 12.
    Sommariva S, Vamos C, Mantzarlis A, Đào LU-L, Tyson DM. Spreading the (fake) news: exploring health messages on social media and the implications for health professionals using a case study. Am J Health Educ. 2018;49(4):246–55.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19325037.2018.1473178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Principles of epidemiology in public health practice, third edition an introduction to applied epidemiology and biostatistics, lesson 1: introduction to epidemiology. https://www.cdc.gov/ophss/csels/dsepd/ss1978/lesson1/index.html. Accessed Oct 2018.
  14. 14.
    CDC: principles of epidemiology in public health practice, third edition an introduction to applied epidemiology and biostatistics. https://www.cdc.gov/ophss/csels/dsepd/ss1978/. Accessed Oct 2018.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christy Duan
    • 1
  • Howard Linder
    • 2
  • Damir Huremović
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PsychiatryZucker Hillside HospitalAstoriaUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychiatryZucker Hillside HospitalGlen OaksUSA
  3. 3.North Shore University HospitalManhassetUSA

Personalised recommendations