Urban History Research and Discovery in the Age of Digital Repositories. A Report About Users and Requirements

  • Sander MünsterEmail author
  • Florian Niebling
  • Jonas Bruschke
  • Kristina Barthel
  • Kristina Friedrichs
  • Cindy Kröber
  • Ferdinand Maiwald


The research group on four-dimensional research and communication of urban history (HistStadt4D) investigates and develops methods and technologies to transfer extensive repositories of historical photographs and their contextual information into a three-dimensional spatial model, with an additional temporal component. This will make content accessible to researchers and the public, via a 4D browser as well as a location-dependent augmented reality representation. Against this background, this article highlights users and requirements of both scholarly and touristic usage of digital information about urban history, in particular historical photographs.


Urban history Photogrammetry Augmented reality 3D User studies 


  1. 1.
    Burke P (2003) Augenzeugenschaft. Bilder als historische Quellen. Wagenbachs Taschenbuch 631. BerlinGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Paul G (2006) Von der Historischen Bildkunde zur Visual History. In: Visual History. Ein Studienbuch. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen, pp 7–36Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wohlfeil R (1986) Das Bild als Geschichtsquelle. Historische Zeitschrift 243:91–100Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pérez-Gómez A, Pelletier L (1997) Architectural Representation and the Perspective Hinge. University Press, Cambridge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kwastek K (2014) Vom Bild zum Bild. Digital Humanities jenseits des Texts (Keynote). Paper presented at the 1. Jahrestagung der Digital Humanities im deutschsprachigen Raum (DHd 2014), PassauGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jensen P (2012) Event-based Archaeological Registration Principles. In: Zhou M, Romanowska I, Wu Z, Xu P, Verhagen P (eds) Revive the Past. Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (CAA). Proceedings of the 39th International Conference, Beijing, April 12-16. Pallas Publications, Amsterdam, pp. 209–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Münster S, Kröber C, Friedrichs K, Bruschke J, Maiwald F, Niebling F (2017) Urban History in 4 Dimensions - Supporting Research and Education. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spatial Inf Sci XLII-2/W5:525–530. Scholar
  8. 8.
    Niebling F, Maiwald F, Barthel K, Latoschik ME (2018) 4D Augmented City Models, Photogrammetric Creation and Dissemination. In: Münster S, Friedrichs K, Niebling N, Seidel-Grzesińska A (eds) Digital Research and Education in Architectural Heritage. UHDL 2017, DECH 2017. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 196–214. Scholar
  9. 9.
    Friedrichs K, Kröber C, Bruschke J, Münster S (2018) Creating Suitable Tools for Art and Architectural Research with Historic Media Repositories. In: Münster S, Friedrichs K, Niebling N, Seidel-Grzesińska A (eds) Digital Research and Education in Architectural Heritage. UHDL 2017, DECH 2017. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 117–138. Scholar
  10. 10.
    Münster S, Kamposiori C, Friedrichs K, Kröber C (2018) Image Libraries and their Scholarly Use in the Field of Art and Architectural History. International Journal on Digital Libraries 19(4):367–383. Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kamposiori C, Benardou A (2011) Collaboration in Art Historical Research: Looking at primitives. Kunstgeschichte, Open Peer Reviewed JournalGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    ViMM WG 2.2 (2017) Meaningful Content connected to the Real World (Report)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bekele M, Pierdicca R, Frontoni E, Malinverni E, Gain J (2018) A Survey of Augmented, Virtual, and Mixed Reality for Cultural Heritage. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 11:1–36. Scholar
  14. 14.
    Münster S (2011) Entstehungs- und Verwendungskontexte von 3D-CAD-Modellen in den Geschichtswissenschaften. In: Meissner K, Engelien M (eds) Virtual Enterprises, Communities & Social Networks. TUDpress, Dresden, pp 99–108Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sweetnam MS, Agosti M, Orio N, Ponchia C, Steiner CM, Hillemann E-C, Siochrú MÓ, Lawless S (2012) User Needs for Enhanced Engagement with Cultural Heritage Collections. In: Zaphiris P, Buchanan G, Rasmussen E, Loizides F (eds) Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries, 2012. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 64–75. Scholar
  16. 16.
    Barreau J-B, Gaugne R, Bernard Y, Le Cloirec G, Gouranton V (2014) Virtual Reality Tools for the West Digital Conservatory of Archaeological Heritage. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Virtual Reality International Conference. ACM, pp 1–4.
  17. 17.
    Münster S (2017) A Survey on Topics, Researchers and Cultures in the Field of Digital Heritage. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences IV-2/W2:157–162. Scholar
  18. 18.
    Münster S, Ioannides M (2015) The scientific community of digital heritage in time and space. In: Guidi G, Scopigno R, Torres JC, Graf H (eds) 2nd International Congress on Digital Heritage 2015. IEEE, Granada, pp 267–274.
  19. 19.
    Hicks D (2006) The Four Literatures of Social Science. In: Moed HF, Glänzel W, Schmoch U (eds) Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research: The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems. Springer Science & Business Media, pp 473–496Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tenopir C, King DW (2008) Electronic Journals and Changes in Scholarly Article Seeking and Reading Patterns. D-Lib Magazine 14 (11/12):1–13.
  21. 21.
    Hemmig W (2009) An empirical study of the information‐seeking behavior of practicing visual artists. Journal of Documentation 65 (4):682–703. Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bakewell E, Beeman WO, Reese CM, Schmitt M (1988) Object, Image, Inquiry: The Art Historian at Work. Getty Art History Information Program, Santa MonicaGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Panofsky E (1939) Studies in Iconology. Humanistic Themes In the Art of the Renaissance. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Commare L (2011) Social tagging als Methode zur Optimierung kunsthistorischer Bilddatenbanken – eine empirische Analyse des ARTigo-Projekts. Kunstgeschichte Open Peer Reviewed JournalGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Datta R, Joshi D, Li J, Wang JZ (2008) Image retrieval: Ideas, influences, and trends of the new age. ACM Comput Surv 40 (2):1–60. Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rieger OY (2009) Search engine use behavior of students and faculty: User perceptions and implications for future research. First Monday 14 (12).
  27. 27.
    Cook MP (2006) Visual representations in science education: The influence of prior knowledge and cognitive load theory on instructional design principles. Science Education 90 (6):1073–1091. Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chandler P, Sweller J (1992) The split‐attention effect as a factor in the design of instruction. British Journal of Educational Psychology 62 (2):233–246. Scholar
  29. 29.
    Avancini H, Straccia U (2005) User recommendation for collaborative and personalised digital archives. International Journal of Web Based Communities 1 (2):163–175. Scholar
  30. 30.
    Normore LF, Tebo ME (2011) Assessing user requirements for a small scientific data repository. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology 48 (1):1–4. Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kohle H (2013) Digitale Bildwissenschaft. Hülsbusch, GlückstadtGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Beaudoin JE, Brady JE (2011) Finding Visual Information: A Study of Image Resources Used by Archaeologists, Architects, Art Historians, and Artists. Art Documentation: Journal of the Art Libraries Society of North America 30 (2):24–36. Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kemman M, Kleppe M, Scagliola S (2014) Just Google It. Digital Research Practices of Humanities Scholars. In: Mills C, Pidd M, Ward E (eds) Proceedings of the Digital Humanities Congress 2012. Studies in the Digital Humanities. HRI Online Publications, SheffieldGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Dudek I, Blaise J-Y, De Luca L, Bergerot L, Renaudin N (2015) How was this done? An attempt at formalising and memorising a digital asset’s making of. In: Digital Heritage, 2015. IEEE, pp 343–346.
  35. 35.
    Warwick C (2012) Studying users in digital humanities. In: Warwick C, Terras M, Nyhan J (eds) Digital Humanities in Practice. Facet Publishing, London, pp 1–21. /9781856049054.002
  36. 36.
    Given LM, Willson R (2018) Information Technology and the Humanities Scholar: Documenting Digital Research Practices. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 69:807–819. Scholar
  37. 37.
    Maxwell A (2010) Digital archives and history research: feedback from an end-user. Library Review 59 (1):24–39. Scholar
  38. 38.
    Maina JKo, Suleman H (2015) Enhancing Digital Heritage Archives Using Gamified Annotations. In: Allen RB, Hunter J, Zeng ML (eds) Digital Libraries: Providing Quality Information. ICADL, 2015. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 169–179. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Given LM, Willson R (2015) Collaboration, Information Seeking, and Technology Use: A Critical Examination of Humanities Scholars' Research Practices. In: Hansen P, Shah C, Klas C-P (eds) Collaborative Information Seeking: Best Practices, New Domains and New Thoughts. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 138–164. Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hastings SK (1999) Evaluation of image retrieval systems: Role of user feedback. Library trends 48 (2):438Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Besser H (1990) Visual access to visual images: the UC Berkeley Image Database Project. Library trends 38 (4):787–798Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Pisciotta H, Brisson R, Ferrin E, Dooris M, Spink A (2001) Penn State visual image user study. D-Lib Magazine 7 (7/8):169–196.
  43. 43.
    Elgammal A (2006) Human-centered Multimedia: Representations and Challenges. In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Workshop on Human-centered Multimedia. ACM, pp 11–18.
  44. 44.
    Giral A (1998) Digital image libraries and the teaching of art and architectural history. Art Libraries Journal 23 (04):18–25. Scholar
  45. 45.
    Lopatin L (2006) Library digitization projects, issues and guidelines: A survey of the literature. Library hi tech 24 (2):273–289. Scholar
  46. 46.
    Terras M (2012) Image Processing in the Digital Humanities. In: Warwick C, Terras M, Nyhan J (eds) Digital Humanities in Practice. Facet Publishing, London, pp 71–90Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Tikka P (2006) Image Retrieval: Theory and Research. MIT Press Leonardo 39 (3):268–269. Scholar
  48. 48.
    Münster S, Barthel K, Bruschke J, Friedrichs K, Kröber C, Maiwald F, Niebling F (2018) Stadtgeschichtliche Forschung und Vermittlung anhand historischer Fotos als Forschungsgegenstand – Ein Zwischenbericht der Nachwuchsgruppe HistStadt4D. Paper presented at the 5. Jahrestagung der Digital Humanities im deutschsprachigen Raum (DHd 2018), CologneGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Digital Methods and Practices Observatory Working Group DARIAH-EU European Research Infrastructure Consortium (2016) European survey on scholarly practices and digital needs in the arts and humanitiesGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Cetina KK, Reichmann W (2015) Epistemic Cultures.In: Wright JD (eds) International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (Second Edition). Elsevier, Oxford, pp 873–880. Scholar
  51. 51.
    Knorr-Cetina K (1982) Scientific Communities or Transepistemic Arenas of Research. A Critique of Quasi-Economic Models of Science. Social Studies of Science 12:101–130. /10.1177/030631282012001005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Beaudoin JE (2009) An Investigation of Image Users across Professions: A Framework of Their Image Needs, Retrieval and Use. Drexel UniversityGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Gregory TR (2007) Under-Served or Under-Surveyed: The Information Needs of Studio Art Faculty in the Southwestern United States. Art Documentation: Journal of the Art Libraries Society of North America 26 (2):57–66. doi: Scholar
  54. 54.
    Chen CJ (2009) Art history: a guide to basic research resources. Collection Building 28 (3):122–125. Scholar
  55. 55.
    Zaibon SB, Pendit UC, Aida J, Abu Bakar JA (2015) User Requirements on Mobile AR for Cultural Heritage Site towards Enjoyable Informal Learning. In: 2015 Asia Pacific Conference on Multimedia and Broadcasting. IEEE, pp 61–67.
  56. 56.
    Jung T, Chung N, Leue MC (2015) The determinants of recommendations to use augmented reality technologies: The case of a Korean theme park. Tourism Management 49:75–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Kounavis CD, Kasimati AE, Zamani ED (2012) Enhancing the Tourism Experience through Mobile Augmented Reality: Challenges and Prospects. International Journal of Engineering Business Management 4:10. Scholar
  58. 58.
    Kounavis CD, Kasimati AE, Zamani ED (2012) Enhancing the tourism experience through mobile augmented reality: Challenges and prospects. Int J Eng Bus Manag 4 (1):1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Ap J, Wong KKF (2001) Case study on tour guiding: Professionalism, issues and problems. Tourism Management 22 (5):551–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Smirnov A, Kashevnik A, Shilov N, Teslya N, Shabaev A (2014) Mobile application for guiding tourist activities: Tourist assistant - TAIS. Conference of Open Innovation Association, FRUCT, 2014:95–100Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Yovcheva Z, Buhalis D, Gatzidis C (2012) Overview of smartphone augmented reality applications for tourism. e-Review of Tourism Research 10 (2):63–66Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Karanasios S, Burgess S, Sellitto C (2011) A Classification of Mobile Tourism Applications. Global Hospitality and Tourism Management Technologies:165–177. doi:
  63. 63.
    Kennedy-Eden H, Gretzel U (2012) A taxonomy of mobile applications in tourism. E-Review of Tourism Research 10 (2):47–50Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Grün C, Werthner H, Pröll B, Retschitzegger W, Schwinger (2008) Assisting Tourists on the Move- An Evaluation of Mobile Tourist Guides. In: 7th International Conference on Mobile Business. IEEE, pp 171–180.
  65. 65.
    Yovcheva Z, Buhalis D, Gatzidis C (2012) Smartphone Augmented Reality Applications for Tourism. E-Review of Tourism Research 10 (2):63–66Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Chung N, Han H, Joun Y (2015) Tourists’ intention to visit a destination: The role of augmented reality (AR) application for a heritage site. Computers in Human Behavior 50:588–599.
  67. 67.
    Goh DH, Ang RP, Lee CK (2010) Determining Services for the Mobile Tourist. Journal of Computer Information Systems 51 (1):31Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Tom Dieck MC, Jung T (2015) A theoretical model of mobile augmented reality acceptance in urban heritage tourism. Current Issues in Tourism 21 (2):154–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Radu I (2014) Augmented reality in education: a meta-review and cross-media analysis. Personal Ubiquitous Comput 18 (6):1533–1543. Scholar
  70. 70.
    tom Dieck MC, Jung TH, tom Dieck D (2016) Enhancing art gallery visitors’ learning experience using wearable augmented reality: generic learning outcomes perspective. Curr Issues Tour:1–21Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Chang Y-L, Hou H, Pan C, Sung Y, Chang K (2015) Apply an Augmented Reality in a Mobile Guidance to Increase Sense of Place for Heritage Places. J Educ Technol Soc 18 (2):166–178Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Kysela J, Štorková P (2015) Using Augmented Reality as a Medium for Teaching History and Tourism. Procedia - Soc Behav Sci 175:926–931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    von Gioi RG, Jakubowicz J, Morel JM, Randall G (2012) LSD: a Line Segment Detector. Image Processing On Line 2:35–55. Scholar
  74. 74.
    Donovan J (2014) Timetraveler App Allows You To See The Berlin Wall Story In Augmented Reality. Tech CrunchGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Wang L, Neumann U, You S (2009) Wide-baseline image matching using Line Signatures. In: IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision. IEEE, pp 1311–1318.
  76. 76.
    Klamert K, Münster S (2017) Child’s play - A literature based survey on gamified tools and methods for fostering public participation in urban planning. In: Electronic Participation. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 24–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Eilam B, Gilbert JK (2014) The Significance of Visual Representations in the Teaching of Science. In: Eilam B, Gilbert JK (eds) Science Teachers’ Use of Visual Representations. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 3–28. Scholar
  78. 78.
    Samuel J, Périnaud C, Servigne S, Georges G, Gesquirère G (2016) Representation and Visualization of Urban Fabric through Historical Documents. In: Catalano CE, De Luca L (eds) 14th Eurographics Workshop on Graphics and Cultural Heritage, Genova, Italy, 2016. The Eurographics AssociationGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Grün A, Remondino F, Zhang L (2004) Photogrammetric Reconstruction of the Great Buddha of Bamiyan, Afghanistan. The Photogrammetric Record 19:177–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Falkingham P, L., Bates K, T., Farlow J, O. (2014) Historical Photogrammetry: Bird’s Paluxy River Dinosaur Chase Sequence Digitally Reconstructed as It Was prior to Excavation 70 Years Ago. PLoS ONE 9 (4):e93247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Agarwal S, Furukawa Y, Snavely N, Simon I, Curless B, Seitz SM, Szeliski R (2011) Building Rome in a Day. Communications of the ACM 54 (10):105–112. Scholar
  82. 82.
    Schindler G, Dellaert F (2012) 4D Cities: Analyzing, Visualizing, and Interacting with Historical Urban Photo Collections. Journal of Multimedia 7 (2):124–131Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Bitelli G, Dellapasqua M, Girelli VA, Sbaraglia S, Tinia MA (2017) Historical Photogrammetry and Terrestrial Laser Scanning for the 3d Virtual Reconstruction of Destroyed Structures: a Case Study in Italy. The International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 42:113Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Maiwald F, Vietze T, Schneider D, Henze F, Münster S, Niebling F (2017) Photogrammetric analysis of historical image repositories for virtual reconstruction in the field of digital humanities. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spatial Inf Sci XLII-2/W3:447–452.
  85. 85.
    Lowe DG (2004) Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. International journal of computer vision 60 (2):91–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Wolfe R (2015) Modern to historical image feature matchingGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Ali HK, Whitehead A (2014) Feature Matching for Aligning Historical and Modern Images. International Journal of Computer Applications 21 (3):188–201Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Micusik B, Wildenauer H, Kosecka J (2008) Detection and matching of rectilinear structures. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE, pp 1–7Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Maiwald F, Schneider D, Henze F, Niebling F, Münster S (2018) Feature Matching of Historical Images Based on Geometry of Quadrilaterals. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spatial Inf Sci XLII-2:643–650. Scholar
  90. 90.
    Zhang L, Koch R (2013) An efficient and robust line segment matching approach based on LBD descriptor and pairwise geometric consistency. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation 24 (7):794–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Ridel B, Reuter P, Laviole J, Mellado N, Couture N, Granier X (2014) The Revealing Flashlight: Interactive Spatial Augmented Reality for Detail Exploration of Cultural Heritage Artifacts. J Comput Cult Herit 7 (2):1–18. Scholar
  92. 92.
    Marques L, António Tenedório J, Burns M, Româo T, Birra F, Marques J, Pires A, António J (2017) Cultural Heritage 3D Modelling and visualisation within an Augmented Reality Environment, based on Geographic Information Technologies and mobile platforms. Architecture, City and Environment 11 (33):117–136.
  93. 93.
    Vlahakis V, Karigiannis J, Tsotros M, Gounaris M, Almeida L, Stricker D, Gleue T, Christou IT, Carlucci R, Ioannidis N (2001) Archeoguide: First Results of an Augmented Reality, Mobile Computing System in Cultural Heritage Sites. In: Proceedings of the 2001 Conference on Virtual Reality, Archeology, and Cultural Heritage, New York, NY, USA, 2001. VAST ‘01. ACM, pp 131–140Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Schmalstieg D, Wagner D (2007) Experiences with Handheld Augmented Reality. In: Proceedings of the 2007 6th IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR '07). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 1-13.
  95. 95.
    Azuma R (2015) Location-Based Mixed and Augmented Reality Storytelling. 2nd edition of Fundamentals of Wearable Computers and Augmented Reality Location-Based Mixed and Augmented Reality Storytelling:259–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Bruschke J, Niebling F, Maiwald F, Friedrichs K, Wacker M, Latoschik ME (2017) Towards Browsing Repositories of Spatially Oriented Historic Photographic Images in 3D Web Environments. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on 3D Web Technology, Brisbane, Australia, 2017. ACM, pp 18:1–18:6.
  97. 97.
    Fidas C, Sintoris C, Yiannoutsou N, Avouris N (2016) A survey on tools for end user authoring of mobile applications for cultural heritage. 2015 6th International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems and Applications (IISA). IEEE.
  98. 98.
    Yee K-P, Swearingen K, Li K, Hearst M (2003) Faceted Metadata for Image Search and Browsing. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA, 2003. ACM, 642681, pp 401–408.
  99. 99.
    Ji Z, Yao W, Pi H, Lu W, He J, Wang H (2017) A Survey of Personalised Image Retrieval and Recommendation. In: Du D, Li L, Zhu E, He K (eds) Theoretical Computer Science. NCTCS 2017. Springer Singapore, Singapore, pp 233–247. Scholar
  100. 100.
    Fitzmaurice G, Matejka J, Mordatch I, Khan A, Kurtenbach G (2008) Safe 3D Navigation. In: Proceedings of the 2008 Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics and Games, Redwood City, California, 2008. ACM, pp 7–15.
  101. 101.
    van Leuken RH, Garcia L, Olivares X, van Zwol R (2009) Visual Diversification of Image Search Results. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on World Wide Web, Madrid, Spain, 2009. ACM, pp 341–350.
  102. 102.
    Jaffe A, Naaman M, Tassa T, Davis M (2006) Generating Summaries and Visualization for Large Collections of Geo-Referenced Photographs. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM international workshop on Multimedia information retrieval, Santa Barbara, California, USA, 2006. ACM, pp 89–98.
  103. 103.
    Chagnaud C, Samuel J, Servigne S, Gesquière G (2016) Visualization of Documented 3D Cities. In: Eurographics Workshop on Urban Data Modelling and Visualisation, Liège, Belgium, 2016. The Eurographics Association.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Media CenterTechnische Universität DresdenDresdenGermany
  2. 2.University of WürzburgWürzburgGermany

Personalised recommendations