Advertisement

The Disabled Consumer and Educational Services Contracts in Brazil

  • Lucas Abreu Barroso
  • Marcos Catalan
Chapter

Abstract

In the legal systematisation of the first Brazilian Civil Code (1916), a person with mental, intellectual or sensory disability was considered absolutely incapable of performing personally the acts of civil life (Article 5), which deprived such person of the power to act according to private autonomy. A person with mental, intellectual or sensory disability was often seen as a burden to his family; since such person required special care, showed no signs of social and/or economic return and because of this was even kept invisible to the community. The current Federal Constitution, promulgated in 1988, albeit recognised as the most plural in Brazilian political history, did not reap immediate results regarding the protection of Fundamental rights of people with disabilities. Even with the edition of the current Civil Code (2002), and after almost a decade and a half of its validity, the legal status of the disabled person had not reached a standard of human dignity compatible with the democratic rule of law. That is because the second Brazilian Civil Code repeated the guidelines on absolute incapacity regarding people with mental, intellectual or sensory disabilities (Article 3). Moreover, a set of constitutional provisions does not mean effectiveness of its legal content in the social fabric. The best possible expectations were renewed with the publication of Law 13,146 of 06.07.2015, establishing the Statute on Persons with Disabilities, to ensure and promote, on equal terms, the exercise of the rights and freedoms of disabled people, aiming at their social inclusion and citizenship. Yet, before the law fulfilled its vacatio legis, the National Confederation of Educational Institutions (CONFENEN) filed in the Federal Supreme Court (STF) the direct action of unconstitutionality (ADI) 5357/DF to repeal § 1 of its Article 28 which prohibits private institutions of any level and type of education to seek additional payment of any kind on their tuition, annual and enrolment fees. However, the highest court of the Brazilian judiciary enforced the Human rights of the disabled consumer concerning contracts for provision of educational services.

Notes

Acknowledgment

The authors thank Kennedy Matos for the translation of the text from Portuguese into English.

References

  1. Barbosa FN (2016) Democracia e participação: o direito da pessoa com deficiência à educação e sua inclusão nas instituições de ensino superior. In: Menezes JB (ed) Direito das pessoas com deficiência psíquica e intelectual nas relações privadas: convenção sobre os direitos da pessoa com deficiência e lei brasileira de inclusão. Processo, Rio de Janeiro, pp 815–833Google Scholar
  2. Barboza HH, Almeida VA Jr (2017) Reconhecimento e inclusão das pessoas com deficiência. RBDCivil 13:17–37Google Scholar
  3. Brasil, Supremo Tribunal Federal (2016) Referendo na Medida Cautelar na Ação Direta de Inconstitucionalidade 5.357 Distrito Federal. T. Pleno. http://portal.stf.jus.br/processos/detalhe.asp?incidente=4818214. Accessed 13 mayo 2018
  4. Carvalho PB (2018) Hermenêutica no direito. In: Leite GS, Streck LL (eds) Interpretação, retórica e linguagem. JusPodivm, Salvador, pp 71–94Google Scholar
  5. Farias CC, Cunha RS, Pinto RB (2016) Estatuto da pessoa com deficiência comentado, 2 rd edn. JusPodivm, SalvadorGoogle Scholar
  6. Ferreira LAM (2016) Arts. 27 a 30. In: Leite FPA, Ribeiro LLG, Costa Filho WM (eds) Comentários ao estatuto da pessoa com deficiência. Saraiva, São Paulo, pp 150–171Google Scholar
  7. Iglesias VDO (2017) Pessoa com deficiência e sua identidade para si na sociedade atual. Juruá, CuritibaGoogle Scholar
  8. Lopes LF (2016) Arts. 1° a 3°. In: Leite FPA, Ribeiro LLG, Costa Filho WM (eds) Comentários ao estatuto da pessoa com deficiência. Saraiva, São Paulo, pp 35–64Google Scholar
  9. Marques CL (2005) Contratos no código de defesa do consumidor: o novo regime das relações contratuais, 5rd edn. Revista dos Tribunais, São PauloGoogle Scholar
  10. Marques CL, Miragem B (2012) O novo direito privado e a proteção dos vulneráveis. Revista dos Tribunais, São PauloGoogle Scholar
  11. Ministério Público Federal (2015) Procuradoria-Geral da República. Parecer na ação direta de inconstitucionalidade 5.357/DF. http://portal.stf.jus.br/processos/detalhe.asp?incidente=4818214. Accessed 13 mayo 2018
  12. Nishiyama AM (2016) Proteção jurídica das pessoas com deficiência nas relações de consume. Juruá, CuritibaGoogle Scholar
  13. Nishiyama AM, Araújo LAD (2016) O estatuto da pessoa com deficiência e a tutela do consumidor: novos direitos? RDC 105:103–121Google Scholar
  14. Oliveira AJG, Fassbinder N (2016) O estatuto da pessoa com deficiência e a hipervulnerabilidade do consumidor: diálogos e desafios. In: Ehrhardt M Jr (ed) Impactos do novo CPC e do EPD no direito civil brasileiro. Fórum, Belo Horizonte, pp 397–414Google Scholar
  15. Rocha MH (2016) Do direito fundamental à educação inclusiva e o estatuto da pessoa com deficiência. RT 963:129–151Google Scholar
  16. Sassaki RK (1997) Inclusão: construindo uma sociedade para todos. WVA, Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
  17. Solomon A (2013) Longe da árvore: pais, filhos e a busca da identidade (trans: Donaldson MG, Luiz AA, Pedro MS). Companhia das Letras, São PauloGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lucas Abreu Barroso
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Marcos Catalan
    • 4
    • 5
    • 6
  1. 1.Civil Law, Universidade Federal do Espírito SantoVitóriaBrazil
  2. 2.Civil Law, Universidade Vila VelhaVila VelhaBrazil
  3. 3.Research Group “Civil Law in Legal Post-modernity”VitóriaBrazil
  4. 4.Consumer Law, Universidade La SalleCanoasBrasil
  5. 5.Civil Law, UnisinosSão LeopoldoBrazil
  6. 6.Research Group “Legal Social Theories”CanoasBrazil

Personalised recommendations