Advertisement

Reducing the IEEE 802.11 Beacon Overhead in Low Mobility Networks

  • Gabriel de Carvalho FerreiraEmail author
  • Priscila Solis Barreto
  • Eduardo Alchieri
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 926)

Abstract

Wireless networks based on the IEEE 802.11 standard use management traffic for advertising the network, promoting service quality, device association/dissociation and maintaining connections. Among the management traffic, the beacon frame is responsible for network advertising and synchronization. The beacon broadcast is designed for scenarios where the network devices are assumed to be mobile, but in scenarios with low mobility, the aggressive transmission of beacon frames by the access points (APs) may be unnecessary, as the probability of changing between networks is very low. This type of management traffic can be identified as unwanted traffic, defined as a set of unproductive transmissions on the shared medium. As the number of APs sharing the same channel increases, the unwanted traffic increases, producing more collisions and reducing the network efficiency and its potential throughput. In this work, we present a proposal to modify the 802.11 protocol to support the dynamic adjustment of the transmission interval between beacon frames. The proposal is based on a method to identify the mobility of devices that share the same channel which is used to characterize the mobility of the network. The comparison of simulation results, considering different scenarios, with other related methods shows that our proposal can be effective to reduce unwanted traffic and increase throughput in networks with low mobility and medium to high traffic intensity.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was partially supported by RNP/CTIC (Brazil) through project 5G-RANGE.

References

  1. 1.
    Bellalta, B.: IEEE 802.11ax: high-efficiency WLANS. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 23(1), 38–46 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1109/mwc.2016.7422404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Benson, T., Akella, A., Maltz, D.A.: Network traffic characteristics of data centers in the wild. In: 10th Annual Conference on Internet Measurement. ACM Press (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bento, T.F.: Um estudo das propriedades do tráfego em redes sem fio e seu impacto na avaliação de desempenho. Master’s thesis. Universidade de Brasília (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chatzimisios, P., Boucouvalas, A.C.: Optimisation of RTS/CTS handshake in IEEE 802.11 wireless LANs for maximum performance. In: IEEE Globecom Workshops (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chien, S.F., Liu, H., Low, A.L.Y., Maciocco, C., Ho, Y.L.: Smart predictive trigger for effective handover in wireless networks. In: 2008 IEEE International Conference on Communications. IEEE (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1109/icc.2008.416
  6. 6.
    Duda, A.: Understanding the performance of 802.11 networks. In: 19th IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gilani, M.H.S., Sarrafi, I., Abbaspour, M.: An adaptive CSMA/TDMA hybrid MAC for energy and throughput improvement of wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc Netw. 11(4), 1297–1304 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2011.01.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    He, S., Chan, S.H.G.: Wi-Fi fingerprint-based indoor positioning: recent advances and comparisons. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 18(1), 466–490 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hess, A., Hyytia, E., Ott, J.: Efficient neighbor discovery in mobile opportunistic networking using mobility awareness. In: 2014 Sixth International Conference on Communication Systems and Networks, COMSNETS. IEEE (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    IEEE: IEEE standard for information technology–telecommunications and information exchange between systems local and metropolitan area networks–specific requirements - part 11: Wireless LAN medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specifications.  https://doi.org/10.1109/ieeestd.2016.7786995
  11. 11.
    Khorov, E., Lyakhov, A., Krotov, A., Guschin, A.: A survey on IEEE 802.11ah: an enabling networking technology for smart cities. Comput. Commun. 58, 53–69 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2014.08.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kwak, J., Lee, H., Lee, K.: A study on the airtime occupied by beacon frame in 802.11 hotspot environment. Proc. KICS 12, 11–12 (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Megyesi, P., Molnár, S.: Analysis of elephant users in broadband network traffic. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 37–45. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Naeem, B., Nyamapfene, A.: Seamless vertical handover in WiFi and WiMAX networks using RSS and motion detection: an investigation. Pac. J. Sci. Technol. 12(1), 298–304 (2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Parameswaran, A.T., Husain, M.I., Upadhyaya, S., et al.: Is RSSI a reliable parameter in sensor localization algorithms: an experimental study. In: Field Failure Data Analysis Workshop, F2DA 2009, vol. 5. IEEE (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Peng, G., Zhou, G., Nguyen, D.T., Qi, X., Lin, S.: HIDE: AP-assisted broadcast traffic management to save smartphone energy. In: 2016 IEEE 36th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, ICDCS. IEEE (2016)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Raghavendra, R., Belding, E.M., Papagiannaki, K., Almeroth, K.C.: Unwanted link layer traffic in large IEEE 802.11 wireless networks. IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 9(9), 1212–1225 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1109/tmc.2010.88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rodrig, M., Reis, C., Mahajan, R., Wetherall, D., Zahorjan, J.: Measurement-based characterization of 802.11 in a hotspot setting. In: Proceeding of the 2005 ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Experimental Approaches to Wireless Network Design and Analysis, E-WIND 2005. ACM Press (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1145/1080148.1080150
  19. 19.
    Sanabria-Russo, L., Barcelo, J., Bellalta, B., Gringoli, F.: A high efficiency MAC protocol for WLANs: providing fairness in dense scenarios. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 25(1), 492–505 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1109/tnet.2016.2587907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sati, S., Graffi, K.: Adapting the beacon interval for opportunistic network communications. In: 2015 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics, ICACCI. IEEE (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1109/icacci.2015.7275576
  21. 21.
    Schauer, L., Dorfmeister, F., Maier, M.: Potentials and limitations of WIFI-positioning using time-of-flight. In: International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation. IEEE (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1109/ipin.2013.6817861
  22. 22.
    Xie, Y., Luo, X., Chang, R.K.C.: Centralized PSM: an AP-centric power saving mode for 802.11 infrastructure networks. In: IEEE Sarnoff Symposium. IEEE (2009)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhou, H., Li, B., Yan, Z., Yang, M.: A channel bonding based QoS-aware OFDMA MAC protocol for the next generation WLAN. Mob. Netw. Appl. 22(1), 19–29 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-015-0670-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gabriel de Carvalho Ferreira
    • 1
    Email author
  • Priscila Solis Barreto
    • 1
  • Eduardo Alchieri
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of Brasilia (UnB)BrasiliaBrazil

Personalised recommendations