Advertisement

Making Profits in the New Competitive and Regulatory Framework

  • Mariarosa BorroniEmail author
  • Simone Rossi
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Banking and Financial Institutions book series (SBFI)

Abstract

This chapter aims to identify the main guidelines by which the new competitive, regulatory and macroeconomic context can be translated into managerial behaviors capable of generating a sustainable level of profitability for the bank. The competitive pressure deriving from new entrants into the market, the macroeconomic environment characterized by lower growth and lower interest rates, the choice of the business model and the composition of a bank’s assets are, in fact, strategic choices on which that bank’s life depends. The chapter provides managerial ‘instructions’ in each of these areas of interest, starting from the data provided by the market examined in the previous parts of the book.

Keywords

Business model Management strategies Costs Capital Stability Bank branches 

References

  1. Altunbas Y., Manganelli S., Marquez-Ibanez D. (2011), Bank risk during the financial crisis: do business models matter?, ECB Working Paper Series No. 1394, November.Google Scholar
  2. Ayadi R. (2019), Banking Business Models. Definition, Analytical Framework and Financial Stability Assessment, Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  3. Ayadi R., Arbak E., De Groen W.P. (2011), Business Models in European Banking. A pre-and-post-crisis screening, Centre for European Policy Studies, Brussels.Google Scholar
  4. Ayadi R., Arbak E., De Groen W.P. (2012), Regulation of European banks and business models: Toward a new paradigm?, Centre for European Policy Studies, Brussels.Google Scholar
  5. Ayadi R., De Groen W.P., Sassi I., Mathlouthi W., Rey H., Aubry O. (2016), Banking Business Models Monitor 2015: Europe, International Research Centre on Cooperative Finance, Montréal.Google Scholar
  6. Bazot G. (2018), Financial Consumption and the Cost of Finance: Measuring Financial Efficiency in Europe (1950–2007), Journal of the European Economic Association, Volume 16, issue 1, February.Google Scholar
  7. BCBS – Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2012), Core Principles for Effective Banking Supervision, September.Google Scholar
  8. BCBS – Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2017), High-level summary of Basel III reforms, December.Google Scholar
  9. Bofondi M., Gobbi G. (2017), The Big Promise of FinTech, in “FinTech and Banking. Friends or Foes?”, European Economy. Banks, Regulation, and the Real Sector, n. 2.Google Scholar
  10. Bonaccorsi di Patti E., Palazzo F. (2018), Bank profitability and macroeconomic conditions: are business models different?, Bank of Italy, Occasional Papers no. 436, June.Google Scholar
  11. Bonaccorsi di Patti E., Felici R., Signoretti F.M. (2016), Euro area significant banks: main differences and recent performance, Bank of Italy, Occasional Papers no. 306, January.Google Scholar
  12. Boss M., Lederer G., Mujic N., Schwaiger M. (2018), Proportionality in banking regulation, Monetary Policy & The Economy, Oesterreichische Nationalbank, Q2/18.Google Scholar
  13. CapGemini, LinkeIn, Efma (2018), World FinTech Report.Google Scholar
  14. CGFS – Committee on the Global Financial System (2018), Structural changes in banking after the crisis, CGFS Papers No. 60, January.Google Scholar
  15. Coen B. (2016), The global financial crisis and the future of international standard setting: lessons from the Basel Committee, Presentation given at Harvard Law School, Cambridge, MA, 12 December.Google Scholar
  16. Cosma S., Ferretti R., Gualandri E., Landi A., Venturelli V. (2017), The Business Model of Banks: A Review of the Theoretical and Empirical Literature, in Chesini G., Giaretta E., Paltrinieri A. (eds), The Business of Banking. Models, Risk and Regulation, Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. CPMI – Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (2014), Non-banks in retail payments, Bank for International Settlements, September.Google Scholar
  18. Cunliffe J. (2017), Ten years on: Lessons from Northern Rock, Single Resolution Board Annual Conference, Brussels.Google Scholar
  19. De Meo E., De Nicola A., Lusignani G., Orsini F., Zicchino L. (2016), European Banks in the XXI Century: Are Their Business Models Sustainable?, 5th EBA Policy Research Workshop “Competition in banking: implications for financial regulation and supervision”, 28–29 November.Google Scholar
  20. Deloitte (2018), Leading in times of change, Banking regulatory outlook 2019 – United States, December.Google Scholar
  21. Di Antonio M. (2018), Business models analysis: the pitfalls of the financial data-driven approach, Bancaria, January.Google Scholar
  22. DLA Piper (2018), Digital Transformation in Financial Services, October.Google Scholar
  23. Draghi M. (2018), Letter to Mr. Enrique Calvet Chambon, Member of the European Parliament, 8 February.Google Scholar
  24. EBA – European Banking Authority (2014), Guidelines on common procedures and methodologies for the supervisory review and evaluation process (SREP), 19 December.Google Scholar
  25. EBA – European Banking Authority (2017), Risk Assessment on the European Banking System, November.Google Scholar
  26. EBA – European Banking Authority (2018a), Risk Assessment on the European Banking System, December.Google Scholar
  27. EBA – European Banking Authority (2018b), The EBA’s Fintech Roadmap. Conclusions from the Consultation on the EBA’s Approach to Financial Technology (FinTech), 15 March.Google Scholar
  28. EBF – European Banking Federation (2018), EBF detailed recommendations for an EU framework of experimentation, 19 December.Google Scholar
  29. ECB – European Central Bank (2016), Recent trends in euro area banks’ business models and implications for banking sector stability, Financial Stability Review, May.Google Scholar
  30. ECB Banking Supervision (2017a), Guidance to banks on non-performing loans, March.Google Scholar
  31. ECB Banking Supervision (2017b), SSM supervisory priorities 2018, 18 December.Google Scholar
  32. ECB Banking Supervision (2017c), 2017 SREP for 2018–2018 Supervisory Priorities – 2018 Stress tests, Frankfurt 18 December.Google Scholar
  33. ECB Banking Supervision (2018), Addendum to the ECB Guidance to banks on non-performing loans: supervisory expectations for prudential provisioning of non-performing exposures, March.Google Scholar
  34. ECB Banking Supervision (2019), Recommendation of the European Central Bank on dividend distribution policies (ECB/2019/1), 7 January.Google Scholar
  35. Elliehausen G. (1998), The Cost of Bank Regulation: A Review of the Evidence, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington, April.Google Scholar
  36. EU Commission (2018), Third Progress Report on the reduction of non-performing loans and further risk reduction in the Banking Union, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council and the European Central Bank, Brussels, 28 November, COM(2018) 766 final.Google Scholar
  37. EU Council (2018), Non-performing loans: political agreement reached on capital requirements for banks’ bad loans, 18 December, press release 815/18.Google Scholar
  38. Farkas A. (2018), EU banks’ business models – Adapt to thrive, Deutsche Bundesbank Conference “Bank business models – Structural changes and their systemic implications”, Frankfurt, 20 February.Google Scholar
  39. Feng G., Wang C. (2018), Why European banks are less profitable than U.S. banks: A decomposition approach, Journal of Banking and Finance 90 (2018), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. FSA – Financial Services Authority (2009), The Turner Review. A regulatory response to the global banking crisis, March.Google Scholar
  41. FSI – Financial Stability Institute (2017), Proportionality in banking regulation: a cross-country comparison, FSI Insights on policy implementation, Bank of International Settlements, No. 1, August.Google Scholar
  42. G7 Cyber Expert Group (2016), Fundamental Elements of Cybersecurity in the Financial Sector, press release, October.Google Scholar
  43. Haldane A. (2009), Rethinking the Financial Network, Speech at the Financial Student Association, Amsterdam, 28 April.Google Scholar
  44. Hildebrand P. (2018), What next for banking union?, Bruegel, Brussels, 8 June.Google Scholar
  45. Huljak I., Mikkonen K., Moré C., Perales C. (2018), Digitalisation and its impact on banks’ profitability, Box A, Financial Stability Review, November.Google Scholar
  46. IMF – International Monetary Fund (2016), Global Financial Stability Report. Fostering Stability in a Low-Growth, Low-Rate Era, October.Google Scholar
  47. IMF – International Monetary Fund (2017), Global Financial Stability Report. Getting The Policy Mix Right, April.Google Scholar
  48. Ingves S. (2014), Implementing the regulatory reform agenda – the pitfall of myopia, Speech at the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Annual International Banking Conference, Chicago, 6 November.Google Scholar
  49. IOSCO – International Organization of Securities Commissions (2017), Research Report on Financial Technologies (Fintech), February.Google Scholar
  50. KPMG (2016), The profitability of EU banks. Hard work or a lost cause?, October.Google Scholar
  51. Levine R. (2017), Comments in Phillipon T. (2017), The FinTech Opportunity, BIS Working Papers No. 655, August.Google Scholar
  52. Liikanen E. (2012), High-level Expert Group on Reforming the Structure of the EU Banking Sector, Final Report, October.Google Scholar
  53. Llewellyn D.T. (2013), Fifty Years in the Evolution of Bank Business Models, in Balling, M. – Gnan E. (eds.), 50 Years of Money and Finance – Lessons and Challenges, Larcier for SUERF – The European Money and Finance Forum.Google Scholar
  54. McKinsey (2017), The case for digital reinvention, Digital McKinsey Survey, February.Google Scholar
  55. Molyneux P. (2013), Performance in European Banking: Productivity, Profitability and Employment Trends, in Balling, M. – Gnan E. (eds.), 50 Years of Money and Finance – Lessons and Challenges, Larcier for SUERF – The European Money and Finance Forum.Google Scholar
  56. Moody’s (2018), Minimising cost of regulatory compliance through RegTech, September.Google Scholar
  57. Nicoletti B. (2017), The future of FinTech. Integrating Finance and Technology in Financial Services, Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  58. Nouy D. (2017), Too much of a good thing? The need for consolidation in the European banking sector, Speech at the VIII Financial Forum, Madrid, 27 September.Google Scholar
  59. Pasiouras F., Tanna S., Zoponnidis C. (2009), The Impact of Banking Regulation on Banks’ Costs and Profit Efficiency: Cross-Country Evidence, International Review of Financial Analysis, 18 (5): 294–302, December.Google Scholar
  60. Phillipon T. (2017), The FinTech Opportunity, BIS Working Papers No. 655, August.Google Scholar
  61. PRA – Prudential Regulation Authority (2018), Business Plan 2018/19, Bank of England.Google Scholar
  62. Restoy F. (2018), Proportionality in banking regulation, speech at Westminster Business Forum Keynote Seminar “Building a resilient UK financial sector – next steps for prudential regulation, structural reform and mitigation risks, London, 4 July.Google Scholar
  63. Roengpitya R., Tarashev N., Tsatsaronis K. (2014), Bank business models, BIS Quarterly Review, December.Google Scholar
  64. Sattler A. (2018), Proportionality in European Banking Regulation, presentation at Policy Research Meeting on Financial Markets and Institutions, Bank of Italy, Rome, 4 October.Google Scholar
  65. Schmitz M., Tirpak M. (2017), Cross-border banking in the euro area since the crisis: what is driving the great retrenchment?, Special features B, Financial Stability Review, November.Google Scholar
  66. Siciliani P. (2018), Competition for retail deposits between commercial banks and non-bank operators: a two-sided platform analysis, Bank of England Staff Working Paper No. 728.Google Scholar
  67. UBS (2018), The urge to merge: Consolidation to come, European Banks, Global Research, 3 September.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics and Social SciencesUniversità Cattolica del Sacro CuorePiacenzaItaly

Personalised recommendations