Conclusion—How and Why to Read Uber-Sport?

  • David L. AndrewsEmail author


This chapter provides a brief summary of the project, keying on the importance of furthering the understanding of uber-sport’s politicization within the current conjuncture. The general recognition of sport’s relationship with politics is noted, as is the conservative rueing of this politicization, specifically with regard to the mobilization of activist politics in the uber-sport arena. Despite their disavowal of politics, the American Right and Trumpism in particular have successfully articulated their ideological orientations and affective investments to the uber-sport assemblage. In light of this, the discussion challenges progressives to counter uber-sport’s regressive and reactionary politicization, by investing in the political-cultural work required to rearticulate uber-sport to emancipatory and actualizing political formations. This conjunctural analysis is offered as a modest contribution to such a project.


Uber-sport Conservatism Progressive politics Rearticulation Political-work 


  1. Adams, M. L., Davidson, J., Helstein, M. T., Jamieson, K. M., Kim, K. Y., King, S., … Rail, G. (2016). Feminist cultural studies: Uncertainties and possibilities. Sociology of Sport Journal, 33(1), 75–91.Google Scholar
  2. Brenner, J., & Fraser, N. (2017). What is progressive neoliberalism?: A debate. Dissent, 64(2), 130–140.Google Scholar
  3. Carrington, B. (2018, May 29). You can’t separate sports from politics because sports are politics. The Huffington Post. Retrieved from
  4. Clarke, J. (2008). Living with/in and without neo-liberalism. Focaal: European Journal of Anthropology, 51, 135–147.Google Scholar
  5. Dorfman, A., & Mattelart, A. (2018 [1971]). How to read Donald Duck: Imperialist ideology in the Disney comic (3rd ed.). New York: OR Books.Google Scholar
  6. Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  7. Grossberg, L. (1997). Cultural studies: What’s in a name? (One more time). In Bringing it all back home: Essays on cultural studies (pp. 245–271). Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Grossberg, L. (2018). Under the cover of chaos: Trump and the battle for the American right. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  9. Hall, S. (1985). Signification, representation, ideology: Althusser and the post-structuralist debates. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 2, 91–114.Google Scholar
  10. King-White, R. (2012). Oh Henry!: Physical Cultural Studies’ critical pedagogical imperative. Sociology of Sport Journal, 29(3), 385–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kunzel, D. (2018 [1971]). Introduction to the English edition. In A. Dorfman & A. Mattelart (Eds.), How to read Donald Duck: Imperialist ideology in the Disney comic (pp. 1–20). New York: OR Books.Google Scholar
  12. Miller, T. (2012). A distorted playing field: Neoliberalism and sport through the lens of economic citizenship. In D. L. Andrews & M. L. Silk (Eds.), Sport and neoliberalism: Politics, consumption, and culture (pp. 23–37). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Newman, J. I., & Giardina, M. (2011). Sport, spectacle, and NASCAR Nation: Consumption and the cultural politics of neoliberalism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Silk, M. (2012). The cultural politics of post-9/11 American sport: Power, pedagogy and the popular. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Thorson, E. A., & Serazio, M. (2018). Sports fandom and political attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 82(2), 391–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Travis, C. (2018). Republicans buy sneakers too: How the left is ruining sports with politics (1st ed.). New York, NY: Broadside Book.Google Scholar
  17. Wasko, J. (2001). Understanding Disney: The manufacture of fantasy. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Physical Cultural Studies Research Group, Department of KinesiologyUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations