Advertisement

Assembling Uber-Sport

  • David L. AndrewsEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter furthers the conceptualizing if uber-sport through recourse to Mandel and Jameson’s understanding of late capitalism, in conjunction with Debord’s theory of the society of the spectacle. This combination leads to an exposition of the integrated uber-sport spectacle, and its various sub-spectacles, as a conceptual model for understanding the structure and working of ideological normalization within consumer capitalist societies. Although insightful, the notion of uber-sport as an integrated spectacle remains rather abstract, so in order to more empirically frame this analysis, the discussion turns to DeLanda’s Deleuzian-informed assemblage theory. Following an overview of the derivation and assumptions of assemblage theory, uber-sport is examined as an acentered assemblage constituted by a contingent amalgam of heterogenous elements, and complex intra- and inter-assemblage rhizomatic relations.

Keywords

Uber-sport Mandel Jameson Late capitalism Debord Integrated spectacle DeLanda Assemblage theory Rhizome 

References

  1. Andrews, D. L. (2006). Disneyization, debord, and the integrated NBA spectacle. Social Semiotics, 16(1), 89–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrews, D. L. (2009). Sport, culture, and late capitalism. In B. Carrington & I. McDonald (Eds.), Marxism, cultural studies and sport (pp. 213–231). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Andrews, D. L., & Ritzer, G. (2018). Sport and prosumption. Journal of Consumer Culture, 18(2), 356–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baker, T., & McGuirk, P. (2016). Assemblage thinking as methodology: Commitments and practices for critical policy research. Territory, Politics, Governance, 5(4), 425–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beetz, J. (2016). Materiality and subject in marxism, (Post-)structuralism, and material semiotics. London: Palgrave Pivot.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bennett, J. (2005). The agency of assemblages and the North American blackout. Public Culture, 17(3), 445–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bogard, W. (2009). Deleuze and machines: A politics of technology? In M. Poster & D. Savat (Eds.), Deleuze and new technology (pp. 15–31). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bourdieu, P. (1998). Acts of resistance: Against the tyranny of the market. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  10. Boykoff, J. (2014). Celebration capitalism and the Olympic Games. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  12. Braudel, F. (1982). The wheels of commerce (Civilization and capitalism, 15th–18th century) (Vol. II). New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  13. Buchanan, I. (1999). Introduction. In I. Buchanan (Ed.), A Deleuzian century? Durham. NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Buchanan, I. (2009). Deleuze and the internet. In M. Poster & D. Savat (Eds.), Deleuze and new technology (pp. 143–160). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Callon, M., & Law, J. (1997). After the individual in society: Lessons on collectivity from science technology and society. The Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers canadiens de sociologie, 22(2), 165–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carrington, B. (2010). Race, sport and politics: The sporting black diaspora. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Clough, P. T. (2004). Future matters: Technoscience, global politics, and cultural criticism. Social Text, 22(3), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Coffey, J. (2013). Bodies, body work and gender: Exploring a Deleuzian approach. Journal of Gender Studies, 22(1), 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Collier, S. J., & Ong, A. (2005). Global assemblages, anthropological problems. In A. Ong & S. J. Collier (Eds.), Global assemblages: Technology, politics, and ethics as anthropological problems (pp. 3–21). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  20. Collins, T. (2013). Sport in capitalist society: A short history. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Conley, V. A. (2009). Of rhizomes, smooth space, war machines and new media. In M. Poster & D. Savat (Eds.), Deleuze and new technology (pp. 32–44). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Debord, G. (1990). Comments on the society of the spectacle (M. Imrie, Trans.). London: Verso.Google Scholar
  23. Debord, G. (1994). The society of the spectacle (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  24. DeLanda, M. (2006). A new philosophy of society: Assemblage theory and social complexity. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  25. DeLanda, M. (2016). Assemblage theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1983). Anti-Oedipus. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  27. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  28. Dyer-Witheford, N. (1999). Cyber-Marx: Cycles and circuits of struggles in high-technology capitalism. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  29. Farias, I. (2010). Introduction: Decentring the object of urban studies. In I. Farias & T. Bender (Eds.), Urban assemblages: How actor-network theory changes urban studies (pp. 1–24). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Foucault, M. (1970). Theatrum philosophicum. Critique, 282, 885–908.Google Scholar
  31. Fox, N. J., & Alldred, P. (2017a). Mixed methods, materialism and the micropolitics of the research-assemblage. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 21(2), 191–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fox, N. J., & Alldred, P. (2017b). Sociology and the new materialism: Theory, research, action. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Fullagar, S. (2017). Post-qualitative inquiry and the new materialist turn: Implications for sport, health and physical culture research. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 9(2), 247–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gray, R. (2018). Jed York, Michael Rubin Weigh-In on sports disruption. Street and Smith’s Sports Business Daily. Retrieved from https://www.sportsbusinessdaily.com/en/Daily/Issues/2018/04/19/World%20Congress%20of%20Sports/Disruptors.aspx.
  35. Grossberg, L. (2006). Does cultural studies have futures? Should it? (or what’s the matter with New York?): Cultural studies, contexts and conjunctures. Cultural Studies, 20(1), 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Grossberg, L. (2010). Cultural studies in the future tense. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Grosz, E. (1994). Volatile bodies: Toward a corporeal feminism. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Gruneau, R. S. (2017). Sport and modernity. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  39. Hall, S. (1996). On postmodernism and articulation: An interview with Stuart Hall (edited by Lawrence Grossberg). In D. Morley & K. H. Chen (Eds.), Stuart Hall: Critical dialogues in cultural studies (pp. 131–150). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Hardt, M., & Weeks, K. (2000). Introduction. In M. Hardt & K. Weeks (Eds.), The Jameson reader (pp. 1–29). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  41. Hargreaves, J. (1986). Sport, power and culture. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  42. Henriques, J. (2011). Sonic bodies: Reggae sound systems, performance techniques, and ways of knowing. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  43. Homer, S., & Kellner, D. (2004). Introduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  44. Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. W. (2002). Dialectic of enlightenment: Philosophical fragments. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Horne, J. (2006). Sport in consumer culture. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hurley, A. (2001). Diners, bowling alleys and trailer parks: Chasing the American dream in the postwar consumer culture. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  47. Jacobs, J. M. (2006). A geography of big things. Cultural Geographies, 13, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Jameson, F. (1991). Postmodernism, or, the cultural logic of late capitalism. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Jameson, F. (1992). The geopolitical aesthetic. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Jameson, F. (1993). Postmodernism and consumer society. In A. Gray & J. McGuigan (Eds.), Studying culture: An introductory reader (pp. 192–205). London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
  51. Jameson, F. (1998). The cultural turn: Selected writings on the postmodern 1983–1998. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  52. Jameson, F. (2008). The ideologies of theory. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  53. Jameson, F. (2009). Valences of the dialectic. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  54. Krier, D., & Swart, W. J. (2014). The commodification of spectacle: Spectators, sponsors and the outlaw biker diegesis at sturgis. Critical Sociology, 42(1), 11–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Landi, D. (2017). Toward a queer inclusive physical education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 23(1), 1–15.Google Scholar
  56. Landi, D. (2018). Queer men, affect, and physical education. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(2), 168–187.Google Scholar
  57. Law, J. (1991). Introduction: Monsters, machines and sociotechnical relations. In J. Law (Ed.), A sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology, and domination (pp. 1–25). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  58. Lears, J. (1994). Fables of abundance: A cultural history of advertising in America. New York: BasicBooks.Google Scholar
  59. Malins, P. (2004). Machinic assemblages: Deleuze, Guattari and an Ethico-Aesthetics of drug use. Janus Head: Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature, Continental Philosophy, Phenomenological Psychology, and the Arts, 7(1), 84–104.Google Scholar
  60. Mandel, E. (1998). Late capitalism (6th ed.). London: Verso Classics.Google Scholar
  61. Marcus, G. E., & Saka, E. (2006). Assemblage. Theory, Culture and Society, 23(2–3), 101–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Markula, P. (2006). Deleuze and the body without organs: Disreading the fit feminine identity. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 30(1), 29–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Martin, R. (1997). Staging crisis: Twin takes in moving performance. In P. Phelan & J. Lane (Eds.), Ends of performance. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  64. McFarlane, C. (2011). On context: Assemblage, political economy and structure. City, 15(3–4), 375–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. McRobbie, A. (2005). Jameson’s postmodernity: The politics of cultural capitalism. The uses of cultural studies (pp. 151–173). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  66. Ong, A. (2007). Neoliberalism as a mobile technology. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 32(1), 3–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Phillips, J. (2006). Agencement/Assemblage. Theory, Culture and Society, 23(2–3), 108–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Roberts, D. (2003). Towards a genealogy and typology of spectacle: Some comments on debord. Thesis Eleven, 75(1), 54–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Rowe, D. (1995). Popular cultures: Rock music, sport and the politics of pleasure. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  70. Schwarzkopf, S., & Gries, R. (2010). Ernest Dichter and motivation research: New perspectives on the making of post-war consumer culture. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Thorpe, H. (2017). Action sports, social media, and new technologies: Towards a research agenda. Communication and Sport, 5(5), 554–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Throsby, K. (2013). “If I go in like a cranky sea lion, I come out like a smiling dolphin”: Marathon swimming and the unexpected pleasures of being a body in water. Feminist Review, 103(1), 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Tomlinson, A. (2002). Theorising spectacle: Beyond Debord. In J. Sugden & A. Tomlinson (Eds.), Power games: A critical sociology of sport (pp. 44–60). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Physical Cultural Studies Research Group, Department of KinesiologyUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations