Advertisement

Development of Foot Contact Sensors for a Crawling Platform

  • Gaël ÉcorchardEmail author
  • Libor Přeučil
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11472)

Abstract

Walking machines are a good compromise between flying machines with a small payload and wheeled machines with limited terrain crossing capabilities for displacements on strongly uneven terrain, such as in search and rescue missions. This paper presents the hardware development of a hexapod crawling robot, in particular the development and integration of foot contact sensors. The development is based on Trossen Robotics’ PhantomX hexapod robotics kit. In its original version, the robot is only meant to be remote controller without any feedback from exteroceptive sensors. We present here a new foot contact sensor providing the required feedback for the contact between the robot’s foot and the ground and their electronic integration in the rest of the system.

Keywords

Walking machines Force sensor 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Technology Agency of the Czech Republic under project TE01020197 Center for Applied Cybernetics 3.

References

  1. 1.
    Bombled, Q., Verlinden, O.: Indirect foot force measurement for obstacle detection in legged locomotion. Mech. Mach. Theory 57, 40–50 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2012.06.003. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0094114X12001310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bombled, Q., Verlinden, O.: A spare method for obstacle sensing in legged locomotion. In: Field Robotics - 14th International Conference on Climbing and Walking Robots and the Support Technologies for Mobile Machines, pp. 491–498 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814374286_0057
  3. 3.
    Celaya, E., Porta, J.: A control structure for the locomotion of a legged robot on difficult terrain. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 5(2), 43–51 (1998).  https://doi.org/10.1109/100.692340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    FSR400, Interlink Electronics. http://www.interlinkelectronics.com/FSR400.php
  5. 5.
    Klein, C.A., Olson, K.W., Pugh, D.R.: Use of force and attitude sensors for locomotion of a legged vehicle over irregular terrain. Int. J. Robot. Res. 2(2), 3–17 (1983).  https://doi.org/10.1177/027836498300200201. http://ijr.sagepub.com/content/2/2/3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mrva, J., Faigl, J.: Tactile sensing with servo drives feedback only for blind hexapod walking robot. In: 10th International Workshop on Robot Motion and Control, RoMoCo 2015, pp. 240–245, July 2015.  https://doi.org/10.1109/RoMoCo.2015.7219742
  7. 7.
    OMD, 3D force sensor. http://optoforce.com/3dsensor/
  8. 8.
    Palis, F., Rusin, V., Schmucker, U., Schneider, A., Zavgorodniy, Y.: Walking robot with articulated body and force controlled legs. In: Adaptive Motion in Animals and Machines (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Palis, F., Rusin, V., Schmucker, U., Schneider, A., Zavgorodniy, Y.: Walking robot with force controlled legs and articulated body. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Symposium on Robotics and Automation in Construction (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Phantomx Hexapod Mark II. http://www.trossenrobotics.com/hex-mk2
  11. 11.
    Schmucker, U., Schneider, A., Rusin, V., Zavgorodniy, Y.: Force sensing for walking robots. In: Adaptive Motion in Animals and Machines (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wettels, N., Fishel, J.A., Loeb, G.E.: Multimodal tactile sensor. In: Balasubramanian, R., Santos, V.J. (eds.) The Human Hand as an Inspiration for Robot Hand Development. STAR, vol. 95, pp. 405–429. Springer, Cham (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03017-3_19CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Czech Insitute of Informatics, Robotics, and CyberneticsCzech Technical University in PraguePragueCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations