The Impact of ERP Systems on the Organizational Maturity of Brazilian Construction Companies

  • Christiane Wagner Mainardes KrainerEmail author
  • Jefferson Augusto Krainer
  • Alfredo Iarozinski Neto
  • Cezar Augusto Romano
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics book series (PROMS, volume 280)


Construction companies have been searching for alternatives to increase their profits margins, based on reducing costs, raising productivity, technological solutions and management of production. The sector finds in the Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system the possibility of controlling and managing the execution of the works on any work step. The ERP, through comercial software packages for the construction industry, operate in an integrated network. The tool has been used by companies in the construction industry to make production and management more efficient. The ERP system has been used by companies in the construction industry to make production and management more efficient. However, implanting this system provokes a great organizational change, which justifies why some companies achieve good results while others do not. The objective of this article is to identify which variables regarding implantation, management and performance of the ERP system interfere in the organizational maturity of a construction company. It has been proven that construction companies with ERP system have more developed aspects of organization and similar management processes. These construction companies distinguish themselves for their bigger integration between processes and departments; a better information flow; and a higher formalization of activities, projects, processes, company positions and functions.


ERP system Organizational maturity Management processes Organizational characteristics Construction industry Information technology (IT) 


  1. 1.
    Kalyanaraman, V.: Overview of IT applications in the construction supply chain. In: Brien, O., Formoso, W.J., Vrijhoef, C.T.: Construction Supply Chain Management: Handbook, Ruben, London, K. A. 1st edn., pp. 15.1–15.32. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sacomano, J.B., Guerrini, F.M., Santos, M.T.S., Moccelin, J.V.: Administração de Produção na Construção Civil: o Gerenciamento de Obras Baseado em Critérios Competitivos [Production Management in Civil Construction: Construction Management Based on Competitive Criteria], 1st edn. Arte & Ciência, São Paulo (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ribeiro, V.: Logística, Sistema Toyota de Produção e suas Inplicações na Construção Civil [Logistics, Toyota Production System and Implications for Civil Construction], 1st edn. Appris, Curitiba (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mello, L.C.B.B., Amorim, S.R.L.D.: O Subsetor de Edificações da Construção Civil no Brasil: Uma Análise Comparativa em Relação à União Europeia e aos Estados Unidos [The Subsector of Buildings of the Civil Construction in Brazil: A X-Ray of the Sector Compared to the European Union and the United States]. Product. J. 19(2), 388–399 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chung, B., Skibniewski, M.J., Kwak, Y.H.: Developing ERP systems success model for the construction industry. J. Construct. Eng. Manage. 135(3), 207–216 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Motiwalla, L.F., Thompson, J.: Enterprise Systems for Management, 2nd edn. Pearson, Boston (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Senge, P.M.: The Dance of Change: The Challenges to Sustaining Momentum in a Learning Organization, 1st edn. Crown Business, New York (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kerzner, H.: Project Management: a Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling, 11th edn. Wiley, New Jersey (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Caldas, M.P., Wood, Jr, T.: How consultants can help organizations survive the ERP frenzy. Paper submitted to the Managerial Consultation Division of the Academy of Management, Chicago (1999)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zach, O., Munkvold, B.E.: ERP system customization in SMEs: a multiple case study. In: PACIS Proceedings, pp. 221. AIS Electronic Library (AISeL), Queensland (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grabski, S., Leech, S., Sangster, A.: Management Accounting in Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, 1st edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Acikalin, U., Kuruoglu, M., Isikdag, U., Underwood, J.: Evaluating the integrative function of ERP systems used within the construction industry. eWork and eBusiness in Architecture, Engineering and Construction, pp. 245–254. Taylor & Francis, London (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Voordijk, H., Van Leuven, A., Laan, A.: Enterprise resource planning in a large construction firm: implementation analysis. Construct. Manage. Econom. 21(5), 511–521 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sarshar, M., Isikdag, U.: A survey of ICT use in the Turkish construction industry. Eng. Construct. Architect. Manage. 11(4), 238–247 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Correa, P.R., Cruz, R.G.: Meta-analysis on the implementation of ERP systems. JISTEM-J. Informat. Syst. Technol. Manage. 2(3), 245–273 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Crespo, C.C., Ruschel, R.C.: Ferramentas BIM: um desafio para a melhoria no ciclo de vida do projeto [BIM Tools: A Challenge for the Improvement in the Project Life Cycle]. In: III Encontro de Tecnologia de Informação e Comunicação na Construção Civil [Meeting of Information Technology and Communication in Civil Construction]. Porto Alegre (2007)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Miller, D., Friesen, P.H.: A longitudinal study of the corporate life-cycle. Manage. Sci. 30(10), 1161–1183 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Harmon, P.: Evaluating an organization’s business process maturity. Business Process Trends Newsletter 2(3), 1–11 (2004)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sarshar, M., Finnemore, M., Haigh, R., Goulding J.: Spice: Is a capability maturity model applicable in the construction industry. In: 8th International Conference on Durability of Building Materials and Components, pp. 2836–43. M.A. Lacasse and D.J. Vanier, Vancouver (1999)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lippitt, G.L., Schmidt, W.H.: Crises in a developing organization. Harvard Bus. Rev. 45, 102–112 (1967)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Phelps, R., Adams, R., Bessant, J.: Life cycles of growing organizations: a review with implications for knowledge and learning. Int. J. Manage. Rev. 9(1), 1–30 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    O’Leary, D.E.: A comparative analysis of the evolution of a taxonomy for best practices. Intell. Syst. Account. Finance Manage. 16(4), 293–309 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Levie, J., Lichtenstein, B.B.: A terminal assessment of stages theory: introducing a dynamic states approach to entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 34(2), 317–350 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E.: Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th edn. Pearson Education, London (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christiane Wagner Mainardes Krainer
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jefferson Augusto Krainer
    • 1
  • Alfredo Iarozinski Neto
    • 1
  • Cezar Augusto Romano
    • 1
  1. 1.PPGEC, Paraná Federal Technology University, Paraná State UniversityCuritibaBrazil

Personalised recommendations