Advertisement

Women’s Bargaining Power and Households’ Living Standards in West Africa: Evidence from Benin, Togo and Mali

  • Monsoï Kenneth Colombiano Kponou
Chapter
Part of the Gender, Development and Social Change book series (GDSC)

Abstract

This chapter examines the effect of women’s participation in household decisions on living standards. In the logic of cooperative theories, the chapter is based on the assumption that the cooperative decision-making process is beneficial for the household’s utility function. Data from the Demographic and Health Survey of Benin, Mali and Togo are used in order to evaluate the impact of women’s bargaining power on household living standards. Results from the study indicate a convergence of the empirical results obtained in these three countries and highlight the beneficial effect of the participation of women in decisions on the standard of living of households. In addition, it appears that variables such as education level, spousal age and place of residence have significant effects on the standard of living of households.

References

  1. Adekunle, A. K., & Yusuf, H. (2013). Poverty, Women Empowerment and Gender Equity for Poverty Reduction in Adamawa State, Nigeria. ISESCO Journal of Science and Technology, 9(15), 86–89.Google Scholar
  2. Afoakwah, C., Annim, C., & Peprah, J. (2015). Household Savings and Women’s Bargaining Power in Ghana. Journal of Global Economics, 3(2), 139.  https://doi.org/10.4172/2375-4389.1000139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anwar, B., Shoaib, M., & Javed, S. (2013). Women’s Autonomy and Their Role in Decision Making at Household Level: A Case of Rural Sialkot, Pakistan. World Applied Sciences Journal, 23(1), 129–136.  https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wasj.2013.23.01.13040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ashraf, N., Karlan, D., & Yin, W. (2006). Household Decision Making and Savings Impacts: Further Evidence from a Commitment Savings Product in the Philippines (No. 939).Google Scholar
  5. Becker, G. S. (1981). A Treatise on the Family (19th ed.). Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Chiappori, P.-A., & Donni, O. (2006). Les modèles non unitaires de comportement du ménage: un survol de la littérature. L’Actualité Économique, 82(1–2), 9–52.  https://doi.org/10.7202/013464ar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coondoo, D., Majumder, A., Chakrabarti, S., Mitra, S., Chakrabarti, S., & Nath, D. C. (2009). Poverty and Household Decisions—An Exploration of Possible Interdependence.Google Scholar
  8. Dito, B. B. (2011). Essays on Women’s Bargaining Power and Intra-Household Resource Allocation in Addis Ababa.Google Scholar
  9. Duflo, E. (2012). Women Empowerment and Economic Development. Journal of Economic Literature, 50(4), 1051–1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fiala, N., & He, X. (2016). Unitary or Noncooperative Intrahousehold Model? Evidence from Couples in Uganda. The World Bank Economic Review, 1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhw011.
  11. Haddad, L., Hoddinott, J., & Alderman, H. (Eds.). (1997). Intrahousehold Resource Developing Countries. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Harriet, T., Opoku-Asare, N. A., Asare, O., & Anin, E. K. (2014). The Role of Women in Reducing Household Poverty in the Bongo District of the Upper East Region, Ghana. Journal of Arts Humanities, 3(4), 99–110.Google Scholar
  13. Islam, M. S. (2014). Microcredit, Financial Inclusion and Women Empowerment Nexus in Bangladesh. Journal of Asian Development Studies, 3(2), 6–15.Google Scholar
  14. McCarthy, A. S. (2016). His and Her Fertility Preferences: An Experimental Evaluation of Asymmetric Information in Tanzania. Department of Applied Economics.Google Scholar
  15. Morrison, A., Raju, D., & Sinha, N. (2007). Gender Equality, Poverty and Economic Growth (No. 4349).Google Scholar
  16. Nordman, C. J., & Sharma, S. (2016). The Power to Choose Gender Balance of Power and Intra-household Educational Spending in India.Google Scholar
  17. Quisumbing, A. R. (2003). Household Decisions, Gender, and Development a Synthesis of Recent research (Quisumbing). IFPRI.Google Scholar
  18. Rode, A. (2011). Literature Review: Non-Unitary Models of the Household (Theory and Evidence). http://www.econ.ucsb.edu/~pjkuhn/Ec250A/StudentsPapers/RodeNonUnitaryModels.pdf
  19. Samuelson, P. A. (1956). Social Indifference Curves. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schmidt, E. (2012). The Effect of Women’s Intrahousehold Bargaining Power on Child Health Outcomes in Bangladesh. Colgate University.Google Scholar
  21. Thiombiano, B. G. (2014). Genre et prise de décision au sein du ménage au Burkina Faso. Cahiers Québécois de Démographie, 43, 249–278.  https://doi.org/10.7202/1027979ar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. UNDP. (2013). Situation de la femme au Bénin en 2013 (pp. 0–6). UNDP.Google Scholar
  23. UNDP. (2015). Gender Equality in Human Development—Measurement Revisited. UNDP.Google Scholar
  24. Urdinola, D. A., & Wodon, Q. (2010). Income Generation and Intra-Household Decision Making: A Gender Analysis for Nigeria. In Gender Disparities in Africa’s Labor Market. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  25. World Bank. (2001). Engendering Development Through Gender Equality in Rights, Resources, and Voice. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Zou, W. (2015). Intrahousehold Productive Inefficiency in Burkina Faso: Can Experimental Inefficiency Measures Explain Differences in Household Income?Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Monsoï Kenneth Colombiano Kponou
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Economics and Managment, University of Abomey-CalaviCotonouBenin

Personalised recommendations