Advertisement

“I Am Also a We”: The Pedagogy of Sense8

  • Ava Laure ParsemainEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Entertainment Industries book series (PAEI)

Abstract

The Wachowskis’ Sense8 is considered one of the most diverse television programmes to date. As its eight lead characters are scattered across the globe, it portrays a range of nationalities, ethnicities and religions. Called a “LGBT masterpiece,” it also represents a wide spectrum of gender and sexual identities, including homosexuality, pansexuality, polyamory, transgenderism and gender queerness. This chapter argues that Sense8 queers not only gender and sexuality but also love and family. It celebrates alternative forms of kinship that challenge the heteronormative model of family. To do so, it uses the generic features of the quality drama as pedagogical tools. Indeed, as a Netflix original programme, it recuperates premium cable’s rhetoric of quality TV and teaches through cinematic narrative structures, graphic sex scenes and self-reflexivity. But while most HBO-type quality dramas use realism as a pedagogical tool, Sense8 teaches through science-fiction, extraordinary characters and a spectacular aesthetic inspired by action/mystery thrillers.

References

  1. Aguado-Peláez, D. (2016). Los cuerpos como cartografía de resistencias: Análisis interseccional de Sense8. Arte y Políticas de Identidad, 15, 39–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, S. (2017). What makes Sense8 the best LGBT TV show. Retrieved from https://www.thedailybeast.com/what-makes-sense8-the-best-lgbt-tv-show
  3. Altman, R. (1987). The American film musical. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Amazon. (2014–). Transparent [Television Series]. Seattle, WA: Jill Soloway.Google Scholar
  5. Arnold, E. A., & Bailey, M. M. (2009). Constructing home and family: How the ballroom community supports African American GLBTQ youth in the face of HIV/AIDS. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 21(2), 171–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bailey, M. M. (2013). Butch queens up in pumps: Gender, performance, and ballroom culture in Detroit. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. BBC. (2006–2011). Torchwood [Television Series]. London: Russell T Davies.Google Scholar
  8. Bolton, M. (2013). The ethics of alterity: Adapting queerness in Brokeback Mountain. In P. Demory & C. Pullen (Eds.), Queer love in film and television (pp. 257–268). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  9. Brighe, M. (2017). Sense8’s cancellation means a loss of representation for queer trans women. Retrieved from https://www.bustle.com/p/sense8s-cancellation-means-a-loss-of-representation-for-queer-trans-women-61856
  10. Capuzza, J. C., & Spencer, L. G. (2017). Regressing, progressing, or transgressing on the small screen? Transgender characters on U.S. scripted television series. Communication Quarterly, 65(2), 214–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cochran, T. R. (2008). Complicating the open closet: The visual rhetoric of Buffy the Vampire Slayer’s sapphic lovers. In R. Beirne (Ed.), Televising queer women: A reader (pp. 49–63). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cornejo, G. (2014). For a queer pedagogy of friendship. TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly, 1(3), 352–367.  https://doi.org/10.1215/23289252-2685633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. DeClue, J. (2011). Lesbian cop, queer killer: Leveraging Black queer women’s sexuality on HBO’s The Wire. Race, Sexuality, and Television, 31(2), 53–62.Google Scholar
  14. Doran, S. E. (2013). Housebroken: Homodomesticity and the normalization of queerness in Modern Family. In P. Demory & C. Pullen (Eds.), Queer love in film and television (pp. 95–104). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  15. Dove-Viebahn, A. (2007). Fashionably femme: Lesbian visibility, style, and politics in The L Word. In T. Peele (Ed.), Queer popular culture: Literature, media, film, and television (pp. 71–83). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Franklin, M. (2015). Queer representation in science fiction television. Adelaide: (Honours), Flinders University.Google Scholar
  17. Freeman, E. (2008). Queer belongings: Kinship theory and queer theory. In G. E. H. M. McGarry (Ed.), A companion to lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer studies (pp. 293–314). Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gross, L. (1991). Out of the mainstream: Sexual minorities and the mass media. Journal of Homosexuality, 21(1–2), 19–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hawkeswood, W. G. (1996). One of the children: Gay Black men in Harlem. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  20. HBO. (2002–2008). The Wire [Television Series]. New York: David Simon.Google Scholar
  21. HBO. (2014–2015). Looking [Television Series]. New York: David Marshall Grant, Sarah Condon & Andrew Haigh.Google Scholar
  22. Heller, D. (2006). How does a lesbian look? Stendhal’s syndrome and The L Word. In K. Akass & J. McCabe (Eds.), Reading The L Word: Outing contemporary television (pp. 55–68). London: I. B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  23. Horak, L. (2014). Trans on YouTube: Intimacy, visibility, temporality. TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly, 1(4), 572–585.  https://doi.org/10.1215/23289252-2815255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hunting, K., & McQueen, A. (2014). A musical marriage: The mashup aesthetic as governing logic in Glee. Quarterly Review of Film and Video, 31(4), 289–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Isaacson, J., Lane-McKinley, M., & Sharpe, K. (2015). Sense8: Part One. Retrieved from https://blindfieldjournal.com/2015/08/14/roundtable-sense8/
  26. Jonet, M. C., & Williams, L. A. (2008). “Everything else is the same”: Configurations of The L Word. In R. Beirne (Ed.), Televising queer women: A reader (pp. 149–162). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Keegan, C. M. (2016). Tongues without Bodies: The Wachowskis’ Sense8. TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly, 3(3–4), 605–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lehane, S. (2017). Sense8 and the importance of happy queer characters. Retrieved from https://medium.com/@goddammitstacey/sense8-and-the-importance-of-happy-queer-characters-dfb665426b79
  29. Levesley, D. (2015). Here’s the best queer scene in Sense8. Retrieved from http://www.slate.com/blogs/outward/2015/06/22/in_sense8_netflix_has_created_a_queer_masterpiece.html
  30. Li, S. (2017). Netflix by Netflix: On Sense8. Retrieved from https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/netflix-by-netflix-on-sense8/#
  31. Light, C. (2015). Sense8 and the failure of global imagination. Retrieved from https://thenerdsofcolor.org/2015/06/10/sense8-and-the-failure-of-global-imagination/
  32. Lothian, A. (2016). Sense8 and utopian connectivity. Science Fiction Film and Television, 9(1), 93–95.Google Scholar
  33. Mai, K. (2017). Sense8 is The LGBT masterpiece the World has been waiting for. Retrieved from https://katiemaiburnside.wordpress.com/2017/05/17/sense8-is-the-lgbt-masterpiece-the-world-has-been-waiting-for/
  34. Manuel, S. L. (2009). Becoming the homovoyeur: Consuming homosexual representation in Queer as Folk. Social Semiotics, 19(3), 275–291.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330903072656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McFarlane, A. (2017). Sense8 (review). Science Fiction Film and Television, 10(1), 149–153.Google Scholar
  36. McKee, A. (2013). The power of art, the power of entertainment. Media, Culture & Society, 35(6), 759–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mincheva, D. (2018). Sense8 and the praxis of utopia. Cinephile, 12(1), 32–39.Google Scholar
  38. Netflix. (2013–). Orange Is The New Black [Television Series]. Los Gatos, CA: Jenji Kohan.Google Scholar
  39. Netflix. (2015–2018). Sense8 [Television Series]. Los Gatos, CA: Lana Wachowski & Lilly Wachowski.Google Scholar
  40. Parmett, H. M. (2016). It’s HBO: Passionate engagement, TV branding, and tourism in the postbroadcast era. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 13(1), 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pepe, S. (2017). “The source of our power”: Female heroes and restorative collaboration in contemporary television. New York: (Master of Arts), State University of New York.Google Scholar
  42. Peters, W. (2011). Pink dollars, white collars: Queer as Folk, valuable viewers, and the price of gay TV. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 28(3), 193–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Phillips, G., II, Peterson, J., Binson, D., Hidalgo, J., Magnus, M., & The YMSM of color SPNS Initiative Study Group. (2011). House/ball culture and adolescent African-American transgender persons and men who have sex with men: A synthesis of the literature. AIDS Care, 23(4), 515–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sharma, R. (2016). The Netflix effect: Impacts of the streaming model on television storytelling. Middletown, CT: (Bachelor Degree), Wesleyan University.Google Scholar
  45. Showtime. (2004–2009). The L Word [Television Series]. New York: Ilene Chaiken.Google Scholar
  46. Smith, A. (2017). Sense8 and a radical queer future. Retrieved from https://medium.com/@AdamCommentism/sense8-and-a-radical-queer-future-ca7f7f4fa1f9
  47. Smith, K. M., & Tyler, I. (2017). Lesbian brides: Post-queer popular culture. Feminist Media Studies, 17(3), 315–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Space/BBC America. (2013–2017). Orphan Black [Television Series]. Toronto, ON: Graeme Manson.Google Scholar
  49. Stewart, S. (2015). Gender and identity in the Wachowskis’ “Sense8” on Netflix. Retrieved from https://www.indiewire.com/2015/06/gender-and-identity-in-the-wachowskis-sense8-on-netflix-203497/
  50. Thurm, E. (2015). The characters of Transparent do that thing they used to do. Retrieved from http://www.avclub.com/tvclub/characters-transparent-do-thing-they-used-do-228996
  51. Vernallis, C. (1998). The aesthetics of music video: An analysis of Madonna’s “Cherish”. Popular Music, 17, 153–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wachowski, L., & Wachowski, L. (Directors). (1996). Bound [Film]. In Gramercy Pictures. Los Angeles: Focus Features.Google Scholar
  53. Wachowski, L., & Wachowski, L. (Directors). (1999). The Matrix [Film]. Los Angeles, CA: Warner Bros.Google Scholar
  54. Wachowski, L., & Wachowski, L. (Directors). (2012). Cloud Atlas [Film]. Los Angeles, CA: Warner Bros.Google Scholar
  55. Walters, S. D. (2012). The kids are all right but the lesbians aren’t: Queer kinship in US culture. Sexualities, 15(8), 917–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Weston, K. (1991). Families we choose: Lesbians, gays, kinship. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  57. White, A. (2015). How Sense8 quietly became the best LGBTQIA representation on TV. Retrieved from https://www.themarysue.com/sense8-reson-to-watch/
  58. Wold, H. (2017). Up next: Representations of the underrepresented in streaming film and television. Undergraduate Honors Thesis, University of Colorado Boulder.Google Scholar
  59. Zilonka, R., & Job, J. (2017). Curriculum of connection: What does Sense8 teach us about love, community and responsibility in days of despair? Interchange, 48, 387–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zinnemann, F. (Director). (1953). From Here to Eternity [Film]. Los Angeles: Columbia Pictures.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The University of New South WalesSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations