Advertisement

The Problem of the Empirical Data: Capital in the Twenty-First Century?

  • Alain HerscoviciEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter, I will make a critical and methodological analysis of the theses presented by Piketty in his book “Capital in the twenty first century” (2014). Income distribution and long-term growth are linked to the specificities of capital and/or to the choice of a value theory. The definition of the nature of capital and/or the choice of a value theory are the necessary conditions to explain the modalities of growth and income distribution.

References

  1. Besomi, Daniele. 2001. Harrod’s Dynamics and the Theory of Growth: The Story of a Mistaken Attribution. Cambridge Journal of Economics 25: 79–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Braudel, Fernand. 1979. Civilisation matérielle, économie et capitalisme XVe-XVIIIème siècle. 2. Les jeux de l’échange. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
  3. ———. 1985. La dynamique du capitalisme. Paris: Champs Flammarion.Google Scholar
  4. Chick, Victoria. 1991. Macroeconomics After Keynes: A Reconsideration of the General Theory. Cambridge: First MIT Press Edition.Google Scholar
  5. Coase, R.H. 1994. Essays on Economics and Economists. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Dávila-Fernández, Marwiland, and José Oreiro. 2016. Piketty in the Light of Pasinetti and Foley: Income Distribution, Economic Growth and Financial Fragility,  Revista de Economia Política 36: 667–683, São Paolo.Google Scholar
  7. Dumont, Louis. 1985. Homo aequalis. Genèse et épanouissement de l’idéologie économique. Paris: NRF, Editions Gallimard.Google Scholar
  8. Felipe, Jesus, and J.S.L. McCombie. 2005. How Sound Are the Foundations of the Aggregate Production Function? Eastern Economic Journal 31 (3) (Summer): 467–488.Google Scholar
  9. Harrod, Roy F. 1939. An Essay in Dynamic Theory. The Economic Journal 49: 14–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Herscovici, Alain. 2006a. O modelo de Harrod: natureza das expectativas de longo prazo, instabilidade e não-linearidade. Economia e Sociedade, Campinas, v. 15, n. 1 (26), p., jan./abr.Google Scholar
  11. ———. 2006b. Keynes e a teoria dos fundos de emprestimos:os fundamentos da critica de Keynes a economia (neo) clássica (Keynes and the loanable funds theory: the foundations of neoclassical economy critic), Análise Econômica, Ano 24, n. 46, setembro 2006, Faculdade de Ciências Econômicas, UFRGS, Porto Alegre.Google Scholar
  12. Kaldor, Nicholas. 1955–1956. Alternative Theories of Distribution. The Review of Economic Studies 23 (2): 83–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Keynes, John Maynard. 2009. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. New York: Classic Books America.Google Scholar
  14. Kregel, J. 1980. Markets and institutions as features of a capitalistic production system. Journal of Post-keynesian Economics/Fall III (1): 32–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lakatos, Imre. 1978. The Methodology of Scientific Research Programs. Philosophical Papers Volume I. Edited by John Worral and Gregory Currie. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Mauss, Marcel. 1923–1924. Essai sur le don. l’année sociologique 1: 30–186.Google Scholar
  17. Orléan, André. 2011. L’empire de la valeur. Refonder l’Économie. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
  18. Pasinetti, Luigi L. 1962. Rate of Profit and Income Distribution in Relation to the Rate of Economic Growth. The Review of Economic Studies 29 (4) (October): 267–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. ———. 1997. The Marginal Efficiency of Investment. In A “Second Edition” of the General Theory-Vol. 1, ed. G.C. Harcourt and P.A. Riach, 198–218. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Polanyi, Karl. 1983. La Grande Transformation. Aux origines politiques et économiques de notre temps. Paris: Editions Gallimard.Google Scholar
  21. Ricardo, David. 1821. On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, 3rd ed. Ontario: Batoche Book 2001.Google Scholar
  22. Thomas, Piketty. 2014. Capital in the Twenty First Century. Cambridge, MA and London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  23. ———. 2013. Le capital au XXIème siècle. Paris: Editions du Seuil.Google Scholar
  24. Solow, R. 1956. A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 70: 65–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. ———. 2014. Everything You Need to Know About ‘Capital in the Twenty-First Century’. http://www.newrepublic.com/article/117429/capital-twenty-first-century-thomaspikettyreviewed. Accessed 14 December 2015.
  26. Vercelli, Alessandro. 1991. Methodological Foundations of Macroeconomics: Keynes and Lucas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universidade Federal do Espírito SantoVitóriaBrazil

Personalised recommendations