Advertisement

An Independence Measure for Expert Collections Based on Social Media Profiles

  • Rafał PalakEmail author
  • Ngoc Thanh Nguyen
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11432)

Abstract

According to current research, a crowd can outperform experts. Surowiecki in his work, has distinguished decentralization, independence, and diversity as key factors of good crowd performance. Due to lack of mathematical models for modelling these aspects, it is still impossible to prove that they have a big impact on the crowd performance. For solving this problem one of the very important crowd metrics called independence measure should be defined and this is the objective of our paper. Proposed measure allows calculating independence values based on data from social media profiles. The biggest advantage of the measure is the possibility of calculating an independence value for a group of people before it could become a collective for realizing concrete objectives. Currently, known solutions largely simplify the problem by describing independence with a single value. The solution presented in the article assumes that the value of the independence is calculated for a specific topic (the calculated value is part of a vector describing the independence between two experts).

Keywords

Wisdom of crowds Independence Collective intelligence Independence measure 

References

  1. 1.
    Fadul, J.A.: Collective learning: applying distributed cognition for collective intelligence. Int. J. Learn. 16(4) (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hong, H., Du, Q., Wang, G., Fan, W., Xu, D.: Crowd wisdom: the impact of opinion diversity and participant independence on crowd performance (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hong, L., Page, S.E.: Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101(46), 16385–16389 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Surowiecki, J.: The Wisdom of Crowds. Anchor, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    McHugh, K.A., Yammarino, F.J., Dionne, S.D., Serban, A., Sayama, H., Chatterjee, S.: Collective decision making, leadership, and collective intelligence: tests with agent-based simulations and a field study. Leadersh. Quart. 27(2), 218–241 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Krause, J., Ruxton, G.D., Krause, S.: Swarm intelligence in animals and humans. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25(1), 28–34 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lorenz, J., Rauhut, H., Schweitzer, F., Helbing, D.: How social influence can undermine the wisdom of crowd effect. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108(22), 9020–9025 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Milgram, S.: Behavioral study of obedience. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 67(4), 371 (1963)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Miligram, S.: Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View. Harper & Row, New York (1974)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nofer, M., Hinz, O.: Are crowds on the internet wiser than experts? The case of a stock prediction community. J. Bus. Econ. 84(3), 303–338 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lévy, P.: From social computing to reflexive collective intelligence: the IEML research program. Inf. Sci. 180(1), 71–94 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Palak, R., Nguyen, N.T.: Prediction markets as a vital part of collective intelligence. In: IEEE International Conference on INnovations in Intelligent SysTems and Applications (INISTA), pp. 137–142. IEEE, July 2017Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Scharfstein, D.S., Stein, J.C.: Herd behavior and investment. Am. Econ. Rev. 80, 465–479 (1990)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schreier, M., Fuchs, C., Dahl, D.W.: The innovation effect of user design: exploring consumers’ innovation perceptions of firms selling products designed by users. J. Market. 76(5), 18–32 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sinha, R.R., Swearingen, K.: Comparing recommendations made by online systems and friends. In: DELOS Workshop: Personalisation and Recommender Systems in Digital Libraries (2001)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Szuba, T.: A formal definition of the phenomenon of collective intelligence and its IQ measure. Fut. Gener. Comput. Syst. 17(4), 489–500 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ho, T.H., Chen, K.Y.: New product blockbusters: the magic and science of prediction markets. Calif. Manag. Rev. 50(1), 144–158 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Malone, T.W., Bernstein, M.S.: Handbook of Collective Intelligence. MIT Press, Cambridge (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Computer Science and ManagementWroclaw University of Science and TechnologyWrocławPoland

Personalised recommendations