Advertisement

The Role of Small RNAs in Plant Somatic Embryogenesis

  • Brenda A. López-Ruiz
  • Vasti T. Juárez-González
  • Eduardo Luján-Soto
  • Tzvetanka D. DinkovaEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

In plants, differentiated somatic cells can revert their identity to pluripotent, reprogrammed cells in order to optimize growth and development depending on external conditions and in aid of overcoming their limitations as sessile organisms. Different modes of regeneration include tissue repair, de novo organogenesis and somatic embryogenesis (SE). The latter usually comprise the formation of proliferating pluripotent cell masses called callus. Identification and characterization of genes involved in the SE process allows the exploitation of distinctive features that make a tissue susceptible to change its normal cell fate and produce new plants massively.

Small RNAs (sRNAs) are non-coding RNA (ncRNA), 20–24 nucleotides long molecules involved in plant development, reproduction and genome reprogramming. Likely, the enormous variety of operating sRNA pathways contributes to the plant phenotypic plasticity. Two main sRNAs classes are defined by their modes of biogenesis: a class in which the precursor is a single-stranded, hairpin loop forming RNA (hpRNA), mainly represented by microRNAs (miRNAs) and a class in which the precursor is a dsRNA molecule (dsRNA) comprising several small interfering RNAs (siRNAs).

sRNAs, especially miRNAs, are common regulators of transcription factors (TFs) essential for plant meristem maintenance, growth and proliferation control, and with recently uncovered role in somatic to embryonic cell reprogramming. Although the siRNA function in plant development and SE has been much less explored, recent findings shape out their relevance in organ patterning and stress responses, both involved in cell plasticity. This review focuses on compiling and integrating the described function of miRNAs and siRNAs as a molecular basis in establishing cell dedifferentiation and further plant regeneration in economically relevant crops.

Keywords

Auxin Embryo patterning Epigenetics hc-siRNAs miRNAs Plant regeneration Somatic embryogenesis tasiR-ARFs 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the financial support from PAPIIT IN214118, PAIP 5000-9118 and CONACYT 238439.

References

  1. Abdel-Ghany SE, Pilon M (2008) MicroRNA-mediated systemic down-regulation of copper protein expression in response to low copper availability in Arabidopsis. J Biol Chem 283:15932–15945.  https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M801406200CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Aida M, Ishida T, Fukaki H, Fujisawa H, Tasaka M (1997) Genes involved in organ separation in Arabidopsis: an analysis of the cup-shaped cotyledon mutant. Plant Cell 9:841–857.  https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.9.6.841CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Alejandri-Ramírez ND, Chávez-Hernández EC, Contreras-Guerra JL, Reyes JL, Dinkova TD (2018) Small RNA differential expression and regulation in Tuxpeño maize embryogenic callus induction and establishment. Plant Physiol Biochem 122:78–89.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2017.11.013CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Armenta-Medina A, Lepe-Soltero D, Xiang D, Datla R, Abreu-Goodger C, Gillmor CS (2017) Arabidopsis thaliana miRNAs promote embryo pattern formation beginning in the zygote. Dev Biol 431:145–151.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2017.09.009CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Aukerman MJ, Sakai H (2003) Regulation of flowering time and floral organ identity by a microRNA and its APETALA2-like target genes. Plant Cell 15:2730–2741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Axtell MJ (2013) Classification and comparison of small RNAs from plants. Ann Rev Plant Biol 64:137–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barbosa ICR, Hammes UZ, Schwechheimer C (2018) Activation and polarity control of PIN-FORMED auxin transporters by phosphorylation. Trends Plant Sci 23:523–538.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2018.03.009CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Beauclair L, Yu A, Bouché N (2010) MicroRNA-directed cleavage and translational repression of the copper chaperone for superoxide dismutase mRNA in Arabidopsis. Plant J 62:454–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bologna NG, Voinnet O (2014) The diversity, biogenesis, and activities of endogenous silencing small RNAs in Arabidopsis. Annu Rev Plant Biol 65:473–503.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-035728CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Borges F, Martienssen RA (2015) The expanding world of small RNAs in plants. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 16:727–774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brodersen P, Sakvarelidze-Achard L, Bruun-Rasmussen M, Dunoyer P, Yamamoto YY, Sieburth L, Voinnet O (2008) Widespread translational inhibition by plant miRNAs and siRNAs. Science 320:1185–1190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Budak H, Akpinar BA (2015) Plant miRNAs: biogenesis, organization and origins. Funct Integr Genomics 15:523–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cao X, Jacobsen SE (2002) Role of the Arabidopsis DRM methyltransferases in de novo DNA methylation and gene silencing. Curr Biol 12:1138–1144.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00925-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carlsbecker A, Lee JY, Roberts CJ, Dettmer J, Lehesranta S, Zhou J, Lindgren O, Moreno-Risueño MA, Vatén A, Thitamadee S, Campilho A, Sebastian J, Bowman JL, Helariutta Y, Benfey PN (2010) Cell signalling by microRNA165/6 directs gene dose-dependent root cell fate. Nature 465:316–321.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08977CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Chakrabarty D, Yu KW, Paek KY (2003) Detection of DNA methylation changes during somatic embryogenesis of Siberian ginseng (Eleuterococcus senticosus). Plant Sci 165:61–68.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(03)00127-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chávez-Hernández EC, Alejandri-Ramírez ND, Juárez-González VT, Dinkova TD (2015) Maize miRNA and target regulation in response to hormone depletion and light exposure during somatic embryogenesis. Front Plant Sci 6:555.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00555CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Chen CJ, liu Q, Zhang YC, Qu LH, Chen YQ, Gautheret D (2011) Genome-wide discovery and analysis of microRNAs and other small RNAs from rice embryogenic callus. RNA Biol 8:538–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chen X (2004) A microRNA as a translational repressor of APETALA2 in arabidopsis flower development. Science 303:2022–2025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chitwood DH, Nogueira FT, Howell MD, Montgomery TA, Carrington JC, Timmermans MC (2009) Pattern formation via small RNA mobility. Genes Dev 23:549–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Constabel CP, Yip L, Patton JJ, Christopher ME (2000) Polyphenol oxidase from hybrid poplar. Cloning and expression in response to wounding and herbivory. Plant Physiol 124:285–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. De-la-Peña C, Nic-Can GI, Galaz-Ávalos RM, Avilez-Montalvo R, Loyola-Vargas VM (2015) The role of chromatin modifications in somatic embryogenesis in plants. Front Plant Sci 6:635.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00635CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Ding J, Zhou S, Guan J (2012) Finding microRNA targets in plants: current status and perspectives. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics 10:264–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dinkova TD, Alejandri-Ramirez ND (2014) MicroRNA expression and regulation during plant somatic embryogenesis. In: Alvarez-Venegas R, De la Peña C, Casas-Mollano J (eds) Epigenetics in plants of agronomic importance: fundamentals and applications. Springer, New York, pp 111–123.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07971-4_7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dotto MC, Petsch KA, Aukerman MJ, Beatty M, Hammell M, Timmermans MCP (2014) Genome-wide analysis of leafbladeless1-regulated and phased small RNAs underscores the importance of the TAS3 ta-siRNA pathway to maize development. PLoS Genet 10:e1004826.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004826CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Efroni I, Mello A, Nawy T, Ip PL, Rahni R, Del Rose N, Powers A, Satija R, Birnbaum KD (2016) Root regeneration triggers an embryo-like sequence guided by hormonal interactions. Cell 165:1721–1733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Elhiti M, Tahir M, Gulden RH, Khamiss K, Stasolla C (2010) Modulation of embryo-forming capacity in culture through the expression of Brassica genes involved in the regulation of the shoot apical meristem. J Exp Bot 61:4069–4085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Elhiti M, Stasolla C, Wang A (2013) Molecular regulation of plant somatic embryogenesis. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant 49:631–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Elmeer KMS, Hennerty MJ (2008) Observations on the combined effects of light, NAA and 2, 4-D on somatic embryogenesis of cucumber (Cucumis sativus) hybrids. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 95:381–384.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-008-9439-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fehér A (2015) Somatic embryogenesis-stress-induced remodelling of plant cell fate. Biochem Biophys Acta 1849:385–402PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Fei Q, Xia R, Meyers BC (2013) Phased, secondary, small interfering RNAs in posttranscriptional regulatory networks. Plant Cell 25:2400–2415.  https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.113.114652CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Fu FF, Dawe RK, Gent JI (2018) Loss of RNA-directed DNA methylation in maize chromomethylase and DDM1-type nucleosome remodeler mutants. Plant Cell 30:1617–1627.  https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.18.00053CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Fukui K, Hayashi K (2018) Manipulation and sensing of auxin metabolism, transport and signaling. Plant Cell Phys 59:1500–1510.  https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcy076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Garrocho-Villegas V, de Jesús-Olivera MT, Quintanar ES (2012) Maize somatic embryogenesis: recent features to improve plant regeneration. In: Loyola-Vargas V, Ochoa-Alejo N (eds) Plant cell culture protocols: methods in molecular biology. Humana Press, Totowa, pp 173–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ge F, Luo X, Huang X, Zhang Y, He X, Liu M et al (2016) Genome-wide analysis of transcription factors involved in maize embryonic callus formation. Physiol Plant 158:452–462.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.12470CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Ge F, Huang X, Hu H, Zhang Y, Li Z, Zou C et al (2017) Endogenous small interfering RNAs associated with maize embryonic callus formation. PLoS One 12:e0180567.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180567CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Grafi G, Ben-Meir H, Avivi Y, Moshe M, Dahan Y, Zemach A (2007) Histone methylation controls telomerase-independent telomere lengthening in cells undergoing dedifferentiation. Developmental Biology 306(2):838–846Google Scholar
  37. Guilfoyle TJ, Hagen G (2007) Auxin response factors. Curr Opin Plant Biol 10:453–460.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2007.08.014CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. He F, Xu C, Fu X, Shen Y, Guo L, Leng M, Luo K (2018) The MicroRNA390 / TRANS-ACTING SHORT INTERFERING RNA3 module mediates lateral root growth under salt stress via the auxin pathway. Plant Phys 177:775–791.  https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.17.01559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Henderson IR, Jacobsen SE (2007) Epigenetic inheritance in plants. Nature 447:418.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05917CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Hisanaga T, Miyashima S, Nakajima K (2014) Small RNAs as positional signal for pattern formation. Curr Opin Plant Biol 21:37–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Honkanen S, Jones VAS, Morieri G, Champion C, Hetherington AJ, Kelly S et al (2017) The mechanism forming the cell surface of tip-growing rooting cells is conserved among land plants. Curr Biol 27:3238–3224.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.09.062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Horstman A, Li M, Heidmann I, Weemen M, Chen B, Muino JM, Angenent GC, Boutilier K (2017) The BABY BOOM transcription factor activates the LEC1-ABI3-FUS3-LEC2 network to induce somatic embryogenesis. Plant Physiol 175:848–857.  https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.17.00232CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Hrtyan M, Šliková E, Hejátko J, Růžička K (2015) RNA processing in auxin and cytokinin pathways. J Exp Bot 66:4897–4912.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erv189CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Huettel B, Kanno T, Daxinger L, Bucher E, Van der Winden J, Matzke AJ, Matzke M (2007) RNA-directed DNA methylation mediated by DRD1 and Pol IVb: a versatile pathway for transcriptional gene silencing in plants. Biochim Biophys Acta 1769:358–374.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbaexp.2007.03.001CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Ikeuchi M, Iwase A, Sugimoto K (2015) Control of plant cell differentiation by histone modification and DNA methylation. Curr Opin Plant Biol 28:60–67.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2015.09.004CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Jiang K, Zhu T, Diao Z, Huang H, Feldman LJ (2010) The maize root stem cell niche: a partnership between two sister cell populations. Planta 231:411–424.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-009-1059-3CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Jin F, Hu L, Yuan D, Xu J, Gao W, He L, Yang X, Zhang X (2014) Comparative transcriptome analysis between somatic embryos (SEs) and zygotic embryos in cotton: evidence for stress response functions in SE development. Plant Biotechnol J 12:161–173.  https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12123CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Joshi M, Sujatha K, Hazra S (2008) Effect of TDZ and 2, 4-D on peanut somatic embryogenesis and in vitro bud development. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 94:85–90.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-008-9390-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kareem A, Durgaprasad K, Sugimoto K, Du Y, Pulianmackal AJ, Trivedi ZB et al (2015) PLETHORA genes control regeneration by a two-step mechanism. Curr Biol 25:1017–1030.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.02.022CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Kasahara H (2016) Current aspects of auxin biosynthesis in plants. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 80:34–42.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09168451.2015.1086259CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Kim S, Mochizuki N, Deguchi A, Nagano AJ, Suzuki T, Nagatani A (2018) Auxin contributes to the intraorgan regulation of gene expression in response to shade. Plant Phys 177:847–862.  https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.17.01259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Knauer S, Holt AL, Rubio-Somoza I, Tucker EJ, Hinze A, Pisch M (2013) A protodermal miR394 signal defines a region of stem cell competence in the Arabidopsis shoot meristem. Dev Cell 24:125–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kouzarides T (2007) Chromatin modifications and their function. Cell 128:693–705.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.02.005CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Kumar V, Van Staden J (2017) New insights into plant somatic embryogenesis: an epigenetic view. Acta Physiol Plant 39:194.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-017-2487-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lafos M, Kroll P, Hohenstatt ML, Thorpe FL, Clarenz O, Schubert D (2011) Dynamic regulation of H3K27 trimethylation during Arabidopsis differentiation. PLoS Genet 7:e1002040.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002040CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Lee C, Clark SE (2013) Core pathways controlling shoot meristem maintenance. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol 2:671–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Leyser O (2018) Auxin signaling. Plant Physiol 176:465–479.  https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.17.00765CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Li T, Chen J, Qiu S, Zhang Y, Wang P, Yang L et al (2012) Deep sequencing and microarray hybridization identify conserved and species-specific microRNAs during somatic embryogenesis in hybrid yellow poplar. PLoS One 7:e43451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lin Y, Lai Z (2013) Comparative analysis reveals dynamic changes in miRNAs and their targets and expression during somatic embryogenesis in longan (Dimocarpus longan Lour.). PLoS One 8:e60337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Lin Y, Lin L, Lai R, Liu W, Chen Y, Zhang Z et al (2015) MicroRNA390-directed TAS3 cleavage leads to the production of tasiRNA-ARF3/4 during somatic embryogenesis in Dimocarpus longan Lour. Front Plant Sci 6:1119PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. Liu PP, Montgomery TA, Fahlgren N, Kasschau KD, Nonogaki H, Carrington JC (2007) Repression of AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR10 by microRNA160 is critical for seed germination and post-germination stages. Plant J 52:133–146.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03218.xCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Long JM, Liu CY, Feng MQ, Liu Y, Wu XM, Guo WW (2018) miR156-SPL modules regulate induction of somatic embryogenesis in citrus callus. J Exp Bot 69:2979–2993.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ery132CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  63. LoSchiavo F, Pitto L, Giuliano G, Torti G, Nuti-Ronchi V, Marazziti D (1989) DNA methylation of embryogenic carrot cell cultures and its variations as caused by mutation, differentiation, hormones and hypomethylating drugs. Theor Appl Genet 77:325–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Lowe K, Wu E, Wang N, Hoerster G, Hastings C, Cho MJ, Scelonge C, Lenderts B, Chamberlin M, Cushatt J et al (2016) Morphogenic regulators Baby boom and Wuschel improve monocot transformation. Plant Cell 28:1998–2015.  https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.16.00124CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  65. Luo YC, Zhou H, Li Y, Chen JY, Yang JH, Chen YQ, Qu LH (2006) Rice embryogenic calli express a unique set of microRNAs, suggesting regulatory roles of microRNAs in plant post-embryogenic development. FEBS Lett 580:5111–5116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Mallory AC, Bartel DP, Bartel B (2005) MicroRNA-directed regulation of Arabidopsis AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR17 is essential for proper development and modulates expression of early auxin response genes. Plant Cell Online 17:1360–1375.  https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.105.031716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Marin E, Jouannet V, Herz A, Lokerse AS, Weijers D, Vaucheret H, Nussaume L, Crespi MD et al (2010) miR390, Arabidopsis TAS3 tasiRNAs, and their AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR targets define an autoregulatory network quantitatively regulating lateral root growth. Plant Cell 22:1104–1117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Matzke MA, Mosher RA (2014) RNA-directed DNA methylation: an epigenetic pathway of increasing complexity. Nat Rev Genet 15:394–408.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Miguel C, Marum L (2011) An epigenetic view of plant cells cultured in vitro: somaclonal variation and beyond. J Exp Bot 62:3713–3725.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/err155CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  70. Milutinovic S, Zhuang Q, Niveleau A, Szyf M (2003) Epigenomic stress response knockdown of DNA methyltransferase 1 triggers an intra-S-phase arrest of DNA replication and induction of stress response genes. J Biol Chem 278:14985–14995.  https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M213219200CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Miyashima S, Honda M, Hashimoto K, Tatematsu K, Hashimoto T, Sato-Nara K et al (2013) A comprehensive expression analysis of the Arabidopsis microRNA165/6 gene family during embryogenesis reveals a conserved role in meristem specification and a non-cell-autonomous function. Plant Cell Physiol 54:375–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Molnar A, Melnyk CW, Bassett A, Hardcastle TJ, Dunn R, Baulcombe DC (2010) Small silencing RNAs in plants are mobile and direct epigenetic modification in recipient cells. Science 328:872–875.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1187959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Mutte SK, Kato H, Rothfels C, Melkonian M, Wong GK-S, Weijers D (2018) Origin and evolution of the nuclear auxin response system. eLife 7:1–25.  https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.33399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Nagasaki H, Itoh J, Hayashi K, Hibara K, Satoh-Nagasawa N, Nosaka M, Mukouhata M, Ashikari M, Kitano H, Matsuoka M et al (2007) The small interfering RNA production pathway is required for shoot meristem initiation in rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:14867–14871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Neelakandan AK, Wang K (2012) Recent progress in the understanding of tissue culture-induced genome level changes in plants and potential applications. Plant Cell Rep 31:597–620.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-011-1202-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Nic-Can GI, López-Torres A, Barredo-Pool F, Wrobel K, Loyola-Vargas VM, Rojas-Herrera R, De-la-Peña C (2013) New insights into somatic embryogenesis: LEAFY COTYLEDON1, BABY BOOM1 and WUSCHEL-RELATED HOMEOBOX4 are epigenetically regulated in Coffea canephora. PLoS One 8:e72160.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072160CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  77. Nobuta K, Lu C, Shrivastava R, Pillay M, De Paoli E, Accerbi M, Arteaga-Vazquez M, Sidorenko L, Jeong DH, Yen Y et al (2008) Distinct size distribution of endogeneous siRNAs in maize: evidence from deep sequencing in the mop1-1 mutant. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:14958–14963.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0808066105CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Nodine MD, Bartel DP (2010) MicroRNAs prevent precocious gene expression and enable pattern formation during plant embryogenesis. Genes Dev 24:2678–2692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Olmedo-Monfil V, Durán-Figueroa N, Arteaga-Vázquez M, Demesa-Arévalo E, Autran D, Grimanelli D, Slotkin RK, Martienssen RA, Vielle-Calzada JP (2010) Control of female gamete formation by a small RNA pathway in Arabidopsis. Nature 464(7288):628.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08828CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  80. Pontes O, Costa-Nunes P, Vithayathil P, Pikaard CS (2009) RNA polymerase V functions in Arabidopsis interphase heterochromatin organization independently of the 24-nt siRNA-directed DNA methylation pathway. Mol Plant 2:700–710.  https://doi.org/10.1093/mp/ssp006CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  81. Radhakrishnan D, Kareem A, Durgaprasad K, Sreeraj E, Sugimoto K, Prasad K (2018) Shoot regeneration: a journey from acquisition of competence to completion. Curr Opin Plant Biol 41:23–31.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2017.08.001CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Reyes JL, Chua NH (2007) ABA induction of miR159 controls transcript levels of two MYB factors during Arabidopsis seed germination. Plant J 49:592–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Rogers K, Chen X (2013) Biogenesis, turnover, and mode of action of plant MicroRNAs. Plant Cell 25:2383–2399.  https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.113.113159CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  84. Roosjen M, Paque S, Weijers D (2018) Auxin response factors: output control in auxin biology. J Exp Bot 69:179–188.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erx237CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Rubio-Somoza I, Weigel D (2011) MicroRNA networks and developmental plasticity in plants. Trends Plant Sci 16:258–264.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2011.03.001CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Sanan-Mishra N, Varanasi SPRM, Mukherjee SK (2013) Micro-regulators of auxin action. Plant Cell Rep 32:733–740.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-013-1425-2CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Santos D, Fevereiro P (2002) Loss of DNA methylation affects somatic embryogenesis in Medicago truncatula. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 70:155–161.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016369921067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Saze H, Tsugane K, Kanno T, Nishimura T (2012) DNA methylation in plants: relationship to small RNAs and histone modifications, and functions in transposon inactivation. Plant Cell Physiol 53:766–784.  https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcs008CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Schoof H, Lenhard M, Haecker A, Mayer KF, Jürgens G, Laux T (2000) The stem cell population of Arabidopsis shoot meristems in maintained by a regulatory loop between the CLAVATA and WUSCHEL genes. Cell 100:635–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Shen Y, Jiang Z, Lu S, Lin H, Gao S, Peng H, Yuan G, Liu L, Zhang Z, Zhao M, Rong T, Pan G (2013) Combined small RNA and degradome sequencing reveals microRNA regulation during immature maize embryo dedifferentiation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 441:425–430.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.10.113CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Si-Ammour A, Windels D, Arn-Bouldoires E, Kutter C, Ailhas J, Meins F, Vazquez F (2011) miR393 and secondary siRNAs regulate expression of the TIR1/AFB2 auxin receptor clade and auxin-related development of Arabidopsis leaves. Plant Physiol 157:683–691.  https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.111.180083CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  92. Singh A, Gautam V, Singh S, Sarkar Das S, Verma S, Mishra V, Mukherjee S, Sarkar AK (2018) Plant small RNAs: advancement in the understanding of biogenesis and role in plant development. Planta 248:545–558.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-018-2927-5CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Smith ZR, Long JA (2010) Control of Arabidopsis apical-basal embryo polarity by antagonistic transcription factors. Nature 464:423–426.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08843CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  94. Stroud H, Ding B, Simon SA, Feng S, Bellizzi M, Pellegrini M, Wang GL, Meyers BC, Jacobsen SE (2013) Plants regenerated from tissue culture contain stable epigenome changes in rice. Elife 2:e00354.  https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.00354CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  95. Su YH, Zhao XY, Liu YB, Zhang CL, O’Neill SD, Zhang XS (2009) Auxin-induced WUS expression is essential for embryonic stem cell renewal during somatic embryogenesis in Arabidopsis. Plant J 59:448–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Sugimoto K, Jiao Y, Meyerowitz EM (2010) Arabidopsis regeneration from multiple tissues occurs via a root development pathway. Dev Cell 18:463–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Sun Q, Liu X, Yang J, Liu W, Du Q, Wang H, Fu C, Li WX (2018) MicroRNA528 affects lodging resistance of maize by regulating lignin biosynthesis under nitrogen-luxury conditions. Mol Plant 11:806–814.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2018.03.013CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. Sunkar R, Li YF, Jagadeeswaran G (2012) Functions of microRNAs in plant stress responses. Trends Plant Sci 17:196–203.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2012.01.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Szyrajew K, Bielewicz D, Dolata J, Wójcik AM, Nowak K, Szczygieł-Sommer A, Szweykowska-Kulinska Z, Jarmolowski A, Gaj MD (2017) MicroRNAs are intensively regulated during induction of somatic embryogenesis in Arabidopsis. Front Plant Sci 8:18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Tamiru M, Hardcastle TJ, Lewsey MG (2018) Regulation of genome-wide DNA methylation by mobile small RNAs. New Phytol 217:540–546.  https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14874CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. Tanurdzic M, Vaughn MW, Jiang H, Lee TH, Slotkin RK, Sosinski B, Thompson WF, Doerge RW, Martienssen RA (2008) Epigenomic consequences of immortalized plant cell suspension culture. PLoS Biol 6:e302.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0060302CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  102. Thompson BE, Basham C, Hammond R, Ding Q, Kakrana A, Lee TF, Simon SA, Meeley R, Meyers BC, Hake S (2014) The dicer-like1 homolog fuzzy tassel is required for the regulation of meristem determinacy in the inflorescence and vegetative growth in maize. Plant Cell 26:4702–4717.  https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.114.132670CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  103. Valledor L, Meijón M, Hasbún R, Cañal MJ, Rodríguez R (2010) Variations in DNA methylation, acetylated histone H4, and methylated histone H3 during Pinus radiata needle maturation in relation to the loss of in vitro organogenic capability. J Plant Physiol 167:351–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Wang JW (2005) Control of root cap formation by MicroRNA-targeted auxin response factors in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Online 17:2204–2216.  https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.105.033076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Wang Y, Zhang T, Wang R, Zhao Y (2018) Recent advances in auxin research in rice and their implications for crop improvement. J Exp Bot 69:255–263.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erx228CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. Winkelmann T (2016) Somatic versus zygotic embryogenesis: learning from seeds. Methods Mol Biol 1359:25–46.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3061-6_2CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. Wójcik AM, Gaj MD (2016) miR393 contributes to the embryogenic transition induced in vitro in Arabidopsis via the modification of the tissue sensitivity to auxin treatment. Planta 244:231–243.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-016-2505-7CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  108. Wójcik AM, Nodine MD, Gaj MD (2017) miR160 and miR166/165 contribute to the LEC2-mediated auxin response involved in the somatic embryogenesis induction in Arabidopsis. Front Plant Sci 8:1–17.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.02024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Wójcik AM, Mosiolek M, Karcz J, Nodine MD, Gaj MD (2018) Whole mount in situ localization of miRNAs and mRNAs during somatic embryogenesis in Arabidopsis. Front Plant Sci 9:1277.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01277CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  110. Wójcikowska B, Jaskóła K, Gąsiorek P, Meus M, Nowak K, Gaj MD (2013) LEAFY COTYLEDON2 (LEC2) promotes embryogenic induction in somatic tissues of Arabidopsis, via YUCCA-mediated auxin biosynthesis. Planta 238:425–440.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-013-1892-2CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  111. Wu XM, Liu MY, Ge XX, Xu Q, Guo WW (2011) Stage and tissue-specific modulation of ten conserved miRNAs and their targets during somatic embryogenesis of Valencia sweet orange. Planta 233:495–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Wu XM, Kou SJ, Liu YL, Fang YN, Xu Q, Guo WW (2015) Genome-wide analysis of small RNAs in nonembryogenic and embryogenic tissues of citrus: microRNA- and siRNA-mediated transcript cleavage involved in somatic embryogenesis. Plant Biotechnol J 13:383–394.  https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12317CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. Xia R, Xu J, Meyers BC (2017) The emergence, evolution, and diversification of the miR390-TAS3-ARF pathway in land plants. Plant Cell 29:1232–1247.  https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.17.00185CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  114. Yamamoto N, Kobayashi H, Togashi T, Mori Y, Kikuchi K, Kuriyama K, Tokuji Y (2005) Formation of embryogenic cell clumps from carrot epidermal cells is suppressed by 5-azacytidine, a DNA methylation inhibitor. J Plant Physiol 162:47–54.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2004.05.013CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. Yang JH, Han SJ, Yoon EK, Lee WS (2006) Evidence of an auxin signal pathway, microRNA167-ARF8-GH3, and its response to exogenous auxin in cultured rice cells. Nucleic Acids Res 34:1892–1899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Yang X, Zhang X, Yuan D, Jin F, Zhang Y, Xu J (2012) Transcript profiling reveals complex auxin signalling pathway and transcription regulation involved in dedifferentiation and redifferentiation during somatic embryogenesis in cotton. BMC Plant Biol 12:110.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-12-110CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  117. Yang X, Wang L, Yuan D, Lindsey K, Zhang X (2013) Small RNA and degradome sequencing reveal complex miRNA regulation during cotton somatic embryogenesis. J Exp Bot 64:1521–1536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Zemach A, Zilberman D (2010) Evolution of eukaryotic DNA methylation and the pursuit of safer sex. Curr Biol 20:R780–R785.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2010.07.007CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. Zhang H, Zhu JK (2011) RNA-directed DNA methylation. Curr Opin Plant Biol 14:142–147.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2011.02.003CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  120. Zhang J, Zhang S, Han S, Wu T, Li X, Li W, Qi L (2012) Genome-wide identification of microRNAs in larch and stage-specific modulation of 11 conserved microRNAs and their targets during somatic embryogenesis. Planta 236:647–657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Zhang J, Xue B, Gai M, Song S, Jia N, Sun H (2017b) Small RNA and transcriptome sequencing reveal a potential miRNA-mediated interaction network that functions during somatic embryogenesis in Lilium pumilum DC. Fisch. Front Plant Sci 8:566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Zhang JH, Zhang SG, Li SG, Han SY, Li WF, Li XM, Qi LW (2014) Regulation of synchronism by abscisic-acid-responsive small noncoding RNAs during somatic embryogenesis in larch (Larix leptolepis). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 116:361–370.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-013-0412-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Zhang TQ, Lian H, Tang H, Dolezal K, Zhou CM, Yu S et al (2015) An intrinsic microRNA timer regulates progressive decline in shoot regenerative capacity in plants. Plant Cell 27:349–360.  https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.114.135186CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  124. Zhang TQ, Lian H, Zhou CM, Xu L, Jiao Y, Wang JW (2017a) A two-step model for de novo activation of WUSCHEL during plant shoot regeneration. Plant Cell 29:1073–1087.  https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.16.00863CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  125. Zhao Y (2018) Essential roles of local auxin biosynthesis in plant development and in Adaptation to environmental changes. Annu Rev Plant Biol 69:417–435.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-042817-040226CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  126. Zhu H, Hu F, Wang R, Zhou X, Sze SH, Liou LW et al (2011) Arabidopsis Argonaute10 specifically sequesters miR166/165 to regulate shoot apical meristem development. Cell 145:242–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brenda A. López-Ruiz
    • 1
  • Vasti T. Juárez-González
    • 1
  • Eduardo Luján-Soto
    • 1
  • Tzvetanka D. Dinkova
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Departamento de Bioquímica, Facultad de QuímicaUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoMéxico CityMexico

Personalised recommendations