An Automatic Discovery Method Based on SNMP and C4.5 in Cross-Regional Interconnected Power System

  • Zhiming ZhongEmail author
  • Jie Wang
  • Chao Hu
  • Yue Chen
  • Tianming Huang
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 905)


Cross-regional interconnection connects the power system with the management information system, or with the Internet, and undermines the properties of the power monitoring system and the external network. Exposing the core assets of the power system originally deployed in the isolated environment to the external network brings great risks to the safe and stable operation of the system. In view of the seriousness of hidden information security risks in cross-region interconnections, this paper proposes an automatic discovery method based on SNMP and C4.5 algorithm for cross-regional interconnection of power systems. It mainly studies system network connection conditions. Based on the system’s all equipment, it fully perceives the network connection of each device in the system, and finally realizes the automatic discovery and early warning of the inter-area interconnection of the system.


Automatic discovery Cross-regional interconnect SNMP C4.5 Power network 



This work is supported by Science and Technology Project of China Southern Power Grid Co., Ltd. “Research and Demonstration of Key Technologies of Network Security Situational Awareness in Power Monitoring System” (No. ZDKJXM20170002).


  1. 1.
    Ouyang, S., Shi, Y., Liu, Y.: Dynamic comprehensive evaluation of power quality for regional grid based on double inspiriting control lines. Power Syst. Technol. 36(12), 205–210 (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sidorenko, A., Xu, Y.C.: Powering China: reforming the electric power industry in China. China J. 120(50), 205 (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Roy, L., Rao, N.D.: Real-time monitoring of power systems using fast second-order method. In: IEE Proceedings C-Generation, Transmission and Distribution, vol. 130(3), pp. 103–110 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Karaulova, I.V., Markova, E.V.: Optimal control problem of development of an electric power system. Autom. Remote Control 69(4), 637–644 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Liu, H., Andresen, G.B., Greiner, M.: Cost-optimal design of a simplified highly renewable Chinese electricity network. Energy 147(15), 534–546 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shao, X.U., Miao, S., Zhou, L.: Calculation method of available transfer capability for cross-regional interconnected power grid. Autom. Electr. Power Syst. 41(15), 74–80 (2017)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liu, Y., Qiong, W.U., Jiang, Z., Qian, A.I.: Management of transmission congestion of cross-region interconnected electricity market based on demand response. Southern Power System Technology (2017)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhou, M., Wang, M., Li, J., Li, G.: Multi-area generation-reserve joint dispatch approach considering wind power cross-regional accommodation. CSEE J. Power Energy Syst. 3(1), 74–83 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Quinlan, J.R.: Combining instance-based and model-based learning. In: Tenth International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 236–243. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. (1993)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Quinlan, J.R.: Induction of decision trees. Mach. Learn. 1(1), 81–106 (1986)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ooi, S.Y., Tan, S.C., Cheah, W.P.: Temporal sampling forest: an ensemble temporal learner. Soft. Comput. 21(23), 1–14 (2016)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhu, H., Zhai, J., Wang, S., Wang, X.: Monotonic decision tree for interval valued data. Commun. Comput. Inf. Sci. 481, 231–240 (2014)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Liu, H., Gegov, A.: Induction of modular classification rules by information entropy based rule generation. In: Sgurev, V., Yager, R., Kacprzyk, J., Jotsov, V. (eds.) Innovative Issues in Intelligent Systems. Springer, Cham (2016)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dai, W., Ji, W.: A mapreduce implementation of C4.5 decision tree algorithm. Int. J. Database Theory Appl. 7(1), 49–60 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hssina, B., Merbouha, A., Ezzikouri, H., Erritali, M.: A comparative study of decision tree ID3 and C4.5. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 4(2), 13–19 (2014)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ibarguren, I., Pérez, J.M., Muguerza, J.: CTCHAID: extending the application of the consolidation methodology. In: Pereira, F., Machado, P., Costa, E., Cardoso, A. (eds.) Progress in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 572–577. Springer, Cham (2015)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Perner, P.: Decision tree induction methods and their application to big data. In: Xhafa, F., Barolli, L., Barolli, A., Papajorgji, P. (eds.) Modeling and Processing for Next-Generation Big-Data Technologies, pp. 57–88. Springer, Cham (2015)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ligeza, A.: Artificial intelligence: a modern approach. Neurocomputing 9, 215–218 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cover, T., Hart, P.: Nearest neighbor pattern classification. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 13(1), 21–27 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zhiming Zhong
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jie Wang
    • 1
  • Chao Hu
    • 2
  • Yue Chen
    • 2
  • Tianming Huang
    • 2
  1. 1.CSG Power Dispatching Control CenterGuangzhouChina
  2. 2.NARI Information & Communication Technology Co., Ltd.NanjingChina

Personalised recommendations