Advertisement

Re-vitalizing the American Feminist-Philosophical Classroom: Transformative Academic Experimentations with Diffractive Pedagogies

  • Evelien GeertsEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter touches upon the damaging impact of neoliberal reason on institutions of higher education, and my efforts as a teacher to help turn things around by re-vitalizing the classroom. After a critique of current neoliberal ‘borderline times’, the chapter takes the reader on a journey of diffractive re-imaginings in which I share some of my experiences of co-learning with undergraduates in an American feminist-philosophical classroom. My central argument is that the neoliberalism-induced crisis in education can be affirmatively counteracted through experimentations with various posthuman and new materialist theories, and the Harawayan-Baradian methodology of diffraction in particular. Furthermore, informed by the impression that theory and pedagogical praxis go hand in hand in many contemporary feminist new materialisms, I zoom in on daily acts of resistance against the neoliberal corporatization of the American university, acts that actualized themselves as feminist new materialist pedagogies. Three examples of diffractive pedagogical strategies are then discussed in detail.

Keywords

Diffractive pedagogies Feminist new materialist pedagogies Neoliberalization Higher education Re-vitalization The American feminist-philosophical classroom 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank the editors of this book volume, Carol Taylor and Annouchka Bayley, together with Clare Hammoor, for their affirmative, constructive feedback. Special thanks go out to my undergraduate students at the University of California, Santa Cruz for their generosity; to Donna Haraway for our wonderful pedagogical lunch conversation in Santa Cruz in 2016; to Bettina Aptheker for teaching me all about feminist pedagogies; to Maija Butters, Delphi Carstens, Lou Mycroft and Kay Sidebottom—my posthumanist companions—and to Iris van der Tuin for her mentorship.

References

  1. Adorno, T. W., & Horkheimer, M. (1997 [1944]). Dialectic of enlightenment (J. Cumming, Trans.). London and New York: VERSO.Google Scholar
  2. Alaimo, S. (2016). Exposed: Environmental politics and pleasures in posthuman times. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  3. Aptheker, B. (1989). How to do meaningful work in women’s studies. Women’s Studies, 17(1–2), 5–16.Google Scholar
  4. Barad, K. (2000). Reconceiving scientific literacy as agential literacy. In R. Reid & S. Traweek (Eds.), Doing science + culture. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Barad, K. (2001). Scientific literacy → agential literacy = (learning + doing) science responsibly. In M. Mayberry, B. Subramaniam, & L. H. Weasel (Eds.), Feminist science studies: A new generation. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Barad, K. (2010). Quantum entanglements and hauntological relations of inheritance: Dis/continuities, spacetime enfoldings, and justice-to-come. Derrida Today, 3(2), 240–268.Google Scholar
  8. Bozalek, V., & Zembylas, M. (2017). Diffraction or reflection? Sketching the contours of two methodologies in educational research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 30(2), 111–127.Google Scholar
  9. Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  10. Braidotti, R. (2016). Don’t agonize, organize! e-flux. https://conversations.e-flux.com/t/rosi-braidotti-don-t-agonize-organize/5294. Accessed 10 March 2018.
  11. Braidotti, R., Bozalek, V., Shefer, T., & Zembylas, M. (Eds.). (2018). Socially just pedagogies: Posthumanist, feminist and materialist perspectives in higher education. London and New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  12. Brown, W. (2015). Undoing the demos: Neoliberalism’s stealth revolution. Brooklyn, NY: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  13. Choy, T. K., Faier, L., Hathaway, M. J., Inoue, M., Satsuka, S., & Tsing, A. (2009). A new form of collaboration in cultural anthropology: Matsutake worlds. American Ethnologist, 36(2), 380–403.Google Scholar
  14. Dardot, P., & Laval, C. (2013). The new way of the world: On neoliberal society (G. Elliott, Trans.). London and New York: VERSO.Google Scholar
  15. De Wachter, D. (2012). Borderline times: Het einde van de normaliteit. Leuven: LannooCampus.Google Scholar
  16. Dolphijn, R., & van der Tuin, I. (2012). New materialism: Interviews & cartographies. Ann Arbor: Open Humanities Press.Google Scholar
  17. Foucault, M. (2008). The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–79 (M. Senellart, Ed. and Graham Burchell, Trans.). New York: Picador.Google Scholar
  18. Freire, P. (2001). Pedagogy of freedom: Ethics, democracy, and civic courage (P. Clarke, Trans.). Lanham and Boulder: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  19. Freire, P. (2006). Pedagogy of the oppressed (M. B. Ramos, Trans.). New York and London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  20. Geerts, E., & van der Tuin, I. (2016). Diffraction & reading diffractively. New materialism almanac. http://newmaterialism.eu/almanac/d/diffraction. Accessed 10 March 2018.
  21. Giroux, H. A. (1988). Teaching as intellectuals: Toward a critical pedagogy of learning. Westport and London: Bergin and Garvey.Google Scholar
  22. Giroux, H. A. (2014). Neoliberalism’s war on higher education. Chicago: Haymarket Books.Google Scholar
  23. Groenke, S. L., & Amos Hatch, J. (Eds.). (2009). Critical pedagogy and teacher education in the neoliberal era: Small openings. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  24. Haraway, D. J. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599.Google Scholar
  25. Haraway, D. J. (1997). Modest_witness@second_millennium. FemaleMan©_meets_oncoMouseTM: Feminism and technoscience. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Haraway, D. J. (2004). The promises of monsters: A regenerative politics for inappropriate/d others. In The Haraway reader. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Hickey-Moody, A., & Page, T. (Eds.). (2016). Arts, pedagogy and cultural resistance: New materialisms. London and New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  29. hooks, b. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. hooks, b. (2003). Teaching community: A pedagogy of hope. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Latour, B. (2005). From realpolitik to dingpolitik or how to make things public. In B. Latour & W. Peter (Eds.), Making things public: Atmospheres of democracy. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  32. Leatherby, L. (2016). US social mobility gap continues to widen. The Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/7de9165e-c3d2-11e6-9bca-2b93a6856354. Accessed 10 March 2018.
  33. Nussbaum, M. C. (2010). Not for profit: Why democracy needs the humanities. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Peck, J. (2010). Constructions of neoliberal reason. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Snaza, N., Sonu, D., Truman, S. E., & Zaliwska, Z. (Eds.). (2016). Pedagogical Matters: New materialisms and curriculum studies. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  36. Subversive Philosophy Memes. (2018). https://estarthewicked.tumblr.com/. Accessed 1 March 2018.
  37. UNdata. (2018). Social indicators. http://data.un.org/en/reg/g1.html. Accessed 3 March 2018.
  38. UNESCO. (2016). Education 2030: Incheon declaration and framework for action for the implementation of sustainable development goal 4. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0024/002456/245656E.pdf. Accessed 5 March 2018.
  39. UNESCO. (2018). Education transforms lives. https://en.unesco.org/themes/education. Accessed 5 March 2018.
  40. UNESCOstat. (2017). Fact Sheet No. 45. September 2017. FS/2017/LIT/45 Literacy Rates Continue to Rise from One Generation to the Next. http://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/fs45-literacy-rates-continue-rise-generation-to-next-en-2017_0.pdf. Accessed 5 March 2018.
  41. van der Tuin, I. (2015). Generational feminism: New materialist introduction to a generative approach. Lanham and Boulder: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of California Santa CruzSanta CruzUSA

Personalised recommendations