Advertisement

Posthuman Encounters in New Zealand Early Childhood Teacher Education

  • Sonja ArndtEmail author
  • Marek Tesar
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter we reposition our thinking on our own pedagogies in ECE teacher education, by arguing for a reimagination of pedagogy and practice in the field of higher education. Positioned in the neoliberal, culturally diverse landscape of our two Aotearoa New Zealand universities, nuanced insights throughout our chapter reveal an already tangled inter- and intra-dependent web with and beyond human actors in higher education. Arguing through Kristeva and Braidotti, we (re)imagine thing/energy/nature/culture connections between human and posthuman conceptions in their messy, multidirectional, unpredictable performances of ECE student teachers’ histories, politics and realities. The meanings and energy inherent in these philosophical analsyses expose unexpected onto-epistemological connections of human and posthuman relationships with multiple wider worlds and theorisations. Exposing these cracks is not a comfort then, of sameness, smoothness or familiarity, but an enlivening elevation into further possible ECE pedagogical realities and uncertainties.

Keywords

Posthumanism Early childhood teacher education New ontologies in education Kristeva Braidotti 

References

  1. Ahmed, S. (2010). Orientations matter. In D. Coole & S. Frost (Eds.), New materialisms: Ontology, agency and politics (pp. 234–257). Durham, UK: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Arndt, S., & Tesar, M. (2018). Narrative methodologies: Challenging and elevating cross-cultural complexities. In S. M. Akpovo, M. J. Moran, & R. Brookshire (Eds.), Collaborative cross-cultural research methodologies in early care and education contexts. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Ball, S. J. (2016). Neoliberal education? Confronting the slouching beast. Policy Futures in Education, 14(8), 1046–1059.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210316664259.
  4. Barad, K. (2015). Transmaterialities: Trans*/matter/realities and queer political imaginings. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 21(2–3), 387–422.  https://doi.org/10.1215/10642684-2843239.
  5. Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  6. Ffrench, P., & Lack, R.-F. (Eds.). (1998). The Tel Quel reader. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Haraway, D. (2007). When species meet. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  8. Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Durham, UK: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Jones, A., & Hoskins, T. K. (2016). A mark on paper: The matter of indigenous-settler history. In C. A. Taylor & C. Hughes (Eds.), Posthuman research practices in education (pp. 75–92). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  10. Kristeva, J. (1984). Revolution in poetic language (M. Waller, Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Kristeva, J. (1991). Strangers to ourselves. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Kristeva, J. (1998). The subject in process. In P. Ffrench (Ed.), The Tel Quel reader (pp. 133–178). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Kristeva, J. (2008). Does European culture exist? Paper presented at the Dagmar and Václav Havel Foundation VIZE 97 prize, Prague Crossroads. Retrieved from http://www.vize.cz/download/laureat-Julia-Kristeva-en-speech.pdf.
  14. Latour, B. (2011). Politics of nature: East and West perspectives. Ethics & Global Politics, 4(1), 71–80.Google Scholar
  15. McCance, D. (1996). L’écriture limite: Kristeva’s postmodern feminist ethics. Hypatia, 11(2), 141–160.Google Scholar
  16. Mika, C. (2012). Overcoming ‘being’ in favour of knowledge: The fixing effect of ‘mātauranga’. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44(10), 1080–1092.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2011.00771.x.Google Scholar
  17. Ministry of Education. (1996). Te Whāriki - he whāriki mātauranga mō ngā mokopuna o aotearoa: Early childhood curriculum. Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media.Google Scholar
  18. Ministry of Education. (2017). Te Whāriki he whāriki mātauranga mō ngā mokopuna o aotearoa: Early childhood curriculum—Draft for consultation. Wellington: New Zealand Government.Google Scholar
  19. Oliver, K. (1998). Summary of major themes: Kristeva and feminism. Julia Kristeva. Retrieved from http://www.cddc.vt.edu/feminism/kristeva.html.
  20. Orange, C. (1989). The Treaty of Waitangi. Wellington, New Zealand: Bridget Williams Books.Google Scholar
  21. Peters, M. A., & Tesar, M. (2017). Bad research, bad education: The contested evidence for evidence-based research, policy and practice in education. In J. Lynch, J. Rowlands, T. Gale, & A. Skourdoumbis (Eds.), Practice theory: Diffractive readings in professional practice and education (pp. 231–246). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Peters, M. A., & Tesar, M. (2018). Philosophy and performance of neoliberal ideologies: History, politics and human subjects. In M. A. Peters & M. Tesar (Eds.), Contesting governing ideologies: An educational philosophy and theory reader on neoliberalism (pp. 2–18). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Prud’homme, J., & Légaré, L. (2006). The subject in process. Signo [online], Rimouski (Quebec). Retrieved from http://www.signosemio.com/Kristeva/semanalysis.asp.
  24. Ritchie, J. (2015). Social, cultural, and ecological justice in the age of the anthropocene: A New Zealand early childhood care and education perspective. Journal of Pedagogy, 6(2), 41–56.Google Scholar
  25. Ritchie, J., & Skerrett, M. (2014). Early childhood education in Aotearoa New Zealand: History, pedagogy and liberation. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  26. Springer, S. (2016). The discourse of neoliberalism: An anatomy of a powerful idea. London, UK: Rowman & Littlefield International.Google Scholar
  27. Stone, L. (2004). Julia Kristeva’s ‘mystery’ of the subject in process. In J. D. Marshall (Ed.), Poststructuralism, philosophy, pedagogy (pp. 119–139). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  28. Taylor, C. A. (2016). Edu-crafting a cacophonous ecology: Posthumanist research practices for education. In C. A. Taylor & C. Hughes (Eds.), Posthuman research practice in education (pp. 5–24). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  29. Tesar, M. (2015). Te Whāriki in Aotearoa New Zealand: Witnessing and resisting neoliberal and neo-colonial discourses in early childhood education [invited chapter]. In V. Pacini-Ketchabaw & A. Taylor (Eds.), Unsettling the colonial places and spaces of early childhood education (pp. 145–170). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Tesar, M., & Arndt, S. (2017). Cross cultural complexities of educational policies. Policy Futures in Education, 15(6), 665–669.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210317736181.Google Scholar
  31. Wallin, J. J. (2017). Pedagogy at the brink of the post-anthropocene. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(11), 1099–1111.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of WaikatoHamiltonNew Zealand
  2. 2.University of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations