Advertisement

Sounds of Scissors: Eventicising Curriculum in Higher Education

  • Bente UllaEmail author
  • Ninni Sandvik
  • Ann Sofi Larsen
  • Mette Røe Nyhus
  • Nina Johannesen
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter advocates a transformation of higher education curriculum. We take elements of an event called ʻSounds of Scissors’ from a Norwegian master’s programme as a point of entry to exploring posthuman pedagogical practices and research. In the event, we investigate how creative entanglements facilitate opportunities for flashes of understanding. The classroom becomes a space for cooperation, laughter and frustration—and, further, a place for local creative research laboratories. This chapter revolves around the following two questions: How is it possible to advance approaches that challenge the superior position of the human subject? How might pedagogical practices and research in higher education strengthen an awareness of affect, bodies and senses beyond human control? Consequently, we explore the potentialities of approaching an event from a perspective beyond subject-orientations. We draw out some key aspects of the work of Spinoza and Deleuze to explore passionate powers, daredevil thoughts and a-personal energies. Through the event ‘Sounds of Scissors’ we explore how higher education might come into existence under our chosen premises.

Keywords

Passionate powers Daredevil thoughts A-personal energies Creations Cooperation 

References

  1. Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meeting. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bayley, A. (2016). Trans-forming higher education: Towards posthumanist strategies of teaching and learning. Performance Research, 21(6), 44–49.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13528165.2016.1240930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Braidotti, R. (2016). The posthuman as becoming-machine. In S. Arrhenius (Ed.), Insomnia: Sleeplessness as a cultural symptom. Stockholm: Bonniers Konsthall.Google Scholar
  4. Deleuze, G. (1995). Negotiations 1972–1990 (M. Joughin, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Deleuze, G. (2001). Pure immanence. Essays of a life (A. Boyman, Trans.). New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  6. Deleuze, G. (2004a). Difference and repetition (P. Patton, Trans.). London, NY: Continuum.Google Scholar
  7. Deleuze, G. (2004b). The logic of sense (M. Lester, Trans.). London, NY: Continuum.Google Scholar
  8. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1983). On the line (J. Johnston, Trans.). New York: Semiotext(e).Google Scholar
  9. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1994). What is philosophy? (H. Tomlinson & G. Burchell, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2004). A thousand plateaus (B. Massumi, Trans.). London, NY: Continuum.Google Scholar
  11. Foucault, M. (1983). This is not a pipe (J. Harkness, Trans. and ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hansson, D. (2012). Unpacking Spinoza: Sustainability education outside the Cartesian box. Journal of Sustainability Education, 3, 1–17.Google Scholar
  13. Hurley, R. (1988). Preface. In G. Deleuze (Ed.), Spinoza: Practical philosophy. San Francisco: City Light Books.Google Scholar
  14. Larsen, A. S. (2017). Når vanskeligheter vernes om og ønskes velkommen [When difficulties are appreciated and welcomed]. Kognition & Pædagogik. Tidsskrift om Gode Læringsmiljøer, 27(106), 32–45.Google Scholar
  15. LeBuffe, M. (2015). Spinoza’s psychological theory. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring). Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/spinoza-psychological/. Accessed 25 January 2018.
  16. Manning, E. (2009). What if it didn’t all begin and end with containment? Toward a leaky sense of self. Body & Society, 15(3), 33–45.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X09337785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Manning, E. (2016). The minor gesture. Durham and London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. May, T. (2005). Gilles Deleuze. An introduction. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nyhus, M. R. (2016). Læring sett som flyt [Learning as flux]. In N. Sandvik (Ed.), Småbarnspedagogikkens komplekse komposisjoner [Complex compositions in toddler pedagogy]. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.Google Scholar
  20. Olsson, L. M. (2012). Eventicizing curriculum. Learning to read and write through becoming a citizen of the world. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 28(1), 88–107.Google Scholar
  21. Olsson, L. M. (2013). Taking children’s questions seriously: The need for creative thought. Global Studies of Childhood, 3(3), 230–253.  https://doi.org/10.2304/gsch.2013.3.3.230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sandvik, N. (Ed.). (2016). Småbarnspedagogikkens komplekse komposisjoner [Complex compositions in toddler pedagogy]. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.Google Scholar
  23. Siddiqui, J. R. (2016). Restyling the humanities curriculum of higher education for posthuman times. Curriculum Inquiry, 46(1), 62–78.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.2015.1133220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Spindler, F. (2007). Att tappa ansiktet. Om subjekt, individ och vänskap hos Gilles Deleuze [Losing face. Subjects, individuals and friendship in the work of Gilles Deleuze]. Aiolos, 29, 47–51.Google Scholar
  25. Taylor, C. A. (2017). Is a posthumanist bildung possible? Reclaiming the promise of bildung for contemporary higher education. Higher Education, 74(3), 419–435.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-9994-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ulla, B. (2017). Reconceptualising sleep: Relational principles inside and outside the pram. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 18(4), 400–408.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1463949117742781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bente Ulla
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ninni Sandvik
    • 1
  • Ann Sofi Larsen
    • 1
  • Mette Røe Nyhus
    • 1
  • Nina Johannesen
    • 1
  1. 1.Østfold University College (ØUC)HaldenNorway

Personalised recommendations