Advertisement

Disruptive Pedagogies for Teacher Education: The Power of Potentia in Posthuman Times

  • Kay Sidebottom
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter recounts the experience of tutors and students at a further education college in the north of England, who, over the course of an academic year, viewed their teacher training curriculum through a posthuman lens in order to reimagine the world of teaching and learning for the twenty-first century and beyond. Becoming a teacher in England today is challenging, as educators at all levels suffer the fall-out of far-reaching funding cuts, increased managerialism, and a shifting educational paradigm that privileges instrumental approaches to teaching. Concepts of posthumanism and their practical application in a teacher training environment are explored, drawing on the thinking of Barad, Braidotti, Deleuze and Guattari and Haraway amongst others. The chapter describes how students and tutors put these concepts to work in order to reimagine their teaching journeys, through art, poetry, ‘disruptive’ pedagogies and rhizomatic emergences, taking cross-disciplinary approaches to traditional academic teacher education pathways. The ethical and practical challenges of taking a ‘posthuman turn’ when training new educators are considered. In a spirit of affirmation, recommendations are then made that draw on ‘potentia’ as a form of power that can move trainee teachers from a place of pain to one of action and transformation.

Keywords

Affirmative ethics Assemblage theory Art Curriculum Nomadic theory Posthumanism New materialism Rhizomatic learning 

References

  1. Ahmed, S. (2017). Living a feminist life. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barad, K. (2009). Matter feels, converses, suffers, desires, yearns and remembers. In R. Dolphijn & I. van der Tuin, New Materialism: Interviews & Cartographies. Michigan: Open Humanities Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Braidotti, R. (2008). Affirmation, pain and empowerment. Asian Journal of Women’s Studies, 14(3), 7–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Braidotti, R. (2012). Nomadic theory: The portable Rosi Braidotti. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  8. Braidotti, R. (2016). Posthuman critical theory. In Critical posthumanism and planetary futures (pp. 13–32). London: Springer.Google Scholar
  9. Braidotti, R. (2017). Posthuman, all too human: The memoirs and aspirations of a posthumanist (The Tanner Lectures), Yale University.Google Scholar
  10. Clover, D., & Stalker, J. (Eds.). (2007). The arts and social justice. Leicester: NIACE.Google Scholar
  11. Coffield, F., & Williamson, B. (2011). From exam factories to communities of discovery. London: Institute of Education Press.Google Scholar
  12. Colman, F. (2018). Feminicity. In R. Braidotti & M. Hlavajova (Eds.), Posthuman glossary. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  13. Cormier, D. (2008). Rhizomatic education: Community as curriculum. http://davecormier.com/edblog/2008/06/03/rhizomatic-education-community-as-curriculum/. Accessed 14 December 2017.
  14. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  15. Ferrando, F. (2012). Towards a posthumanist methodology. A statement. Frame: Journal of Literary Studies. Special Issue on Narrating Posthumanism, 25(1), 9–18.Google Scholar
  16. Forstenzer, J. (2016). The teaching excellence framework: What’s the purpose? The Sir Bernard Crick Centre. http://www.crickcentre.org/teaching-excellence-framework/. Accessed 25 October 2017.
  17. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  18. Haraway, D. (2006). A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late 20th century. In J. Weiss, J. Nolan, J. Hunsinger, & P. Trifonas (Eds.), The international handbook of virtual learning environments. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  19. Haraway, D. (2008). When species meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  20. Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Hlavajova, M. (2015, August 26). Critique-as-proposition: Thinking about, with, and through art in our time. University of Utrecht.Google Scholar
  22. Jagodzinksi, J. (2018). From the artist to the cosmic artisan: The educational task for art in anthropogenic times. In C. Naughton, G. Biesta, & D. Cole (Eds.), Art, artists and pedagogy: Philosophy and the arts in education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  24. Münch, R. (2014). Academic capitalism: Universities in the global struggle for excellence. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Mycroft, L., & Sidebottom, K. (2018). Constellations of practice. In P. Bennett & R. Smith (Eds.), Identity and resistance in further education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Mycroft, L., & Weatherby, J. (2015). Spaces to dance: Community education. In M. Daley, K. Orr, & J. Petrie (Eds.), Further education and the twelve dancing princesses. London: Trentham Books.Google Scholar
  27. Nordstrom, S., Nordstrom, A., & Nordstrom, C. (2018). Guilty of loving you: A multispecies narrative. Qualitative Inquiry, 1–8.Google Scholar
  28. NUS Black Students. (2015). Why is my curriculum white? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dscx4h2l-Pk. Accessed 14 January 2018.
  29. Palmer, P. J. (1998). The courage to teach: Exploring the inner landscape of a teacher’s life. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  30. Randle, K., & Brady, N. (1997). Managerialism and professionalism in the ‘cinderella service’. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 49(1), 121–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Reay, D. (2012). What would a socially just education system look like?: Saving the minnows from the pike. Journal of Education Policy, 27(5), 587–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Seeking Lost Women. (2015). Lost women educators. http://seekinglostwomen.blogspot.co.uk/. Accessed 21 January 2018.
  33. Sidebottom, K. (2017). Teaching form 2: Alternative notes from a teaching observation. Belonging: Transformative Education in Challenging Times. https://teachdifferent2017.wordpress.com/magazine/. Accessed 28 August 2018.
  34. Society for the Advancement of Philosophical Enquiry and Reflection in Education. (n.d.). Community philosophy. http://www.sapere.org.uk/Members,Schools,Partners/CommunityPhilosophy.aspx. Accessed 21 January 2018.
  35. Strom, K. (2017). “That’s not very Deleuzian”: Thoughts on interrupting the exclusionary nature of “high theory”. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 50(1), 104–113. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00131857.2017.1339340?journalCode=rept20. Accessed 12 January 2018.
  36. Suissa, J. (2014). Towards an anarchist philosophy of education. New perspectives in philosophy of education (pp. 139–159). London: Bloomsbury Academic Press.Google Scholar
  37. Taylor, C. A. (2016). Edu-crafting a cacophonous ecology: Posthuman research practice for education. In C. A. Taylor & C. Hughes (Eds.), Posthuman research practices in education. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  38. University of Huddersfield. (2016). In-service certificate in education (lifelong learning) module handbook. Huddersfield, UK: Author.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kay Sidebottom
    • 1
  1. 1.Leeds Beckett UniversityLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations