Unfolding: Co-Conspirators, Contemplations, Complications and More

  • Carol A. TaylorEmail author


This chapter provides a theoretical-practical introduction to the book and an overview of the book’s contents. Written as an un/en/folding, the chapter discusses the promises, possibilities and pains of posthuman higher education pedagogy, practice and research in relation to a range of key concerns, contestations and imperatives which currently shape the marketized, individualized, performative, accelerated academy. It discusses the challenges and opportunities posthumanism offers in reshaping how higher education pedagogy, practice and research is defined, approached and gets done. It considers the ways in which posthumanist experimentations rupture and reconfigure higher education ‘business-as-usual’. It also ponders the geopolitics of knowledg(e)ing(s) in its engagement with recent criticism of posthumanism’s ‘White episteme’ emerging from Indigenous and decolonizing studies. The chapter suggests that zoe-philia—which posits optimistic, non-anthropocentric, ecologically oriented modes of nonhuman-human being and becoming—offers new understandings of ontology, epistemology and ethics that can be shaped as affirmative, response-able, care-full practices for higher education.


Un/en/folding Experimentation Rupture Knowledge Ethico-onto-epistemology Zoe 


  1. Ahenakew, C. (2017). Mapping and complicating conversations about indigenous education. Diaspora, Indigenous, and Minority Education, 11(2), 80–91.Google Scholar
  2. Ahmed, S. (2017). Living a feminist life. London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Alveson, M. (2013). The triumph of emptiness. Consumption, higher education and work organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Barad, K. (2014). Diffracting diffraction: Cutting together-apart. Parallax, 20(3), 168–187.Google Scholar
  6. BBC. (2018). A year on from Blue Planet II, BBC one film reveals the devastating consequences of the plastic pollution crisis in our oceans. Retrieved from
  7. Benozzo, A., Koro-Ljungberg, M., & Carey, N. (2016). Five or more IKEA customers in search of an author. Qualitative Inquiry, 22, 568–580.Google Scholar
  8. Bozalek, V., Braidotti, R., Shefer, T., & Zembylas, M. (Eds.). (2018). Socially just pedagogies: Posthumanist, feminist and materialist perspectives in higher education. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  9. Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  10. Braidotti, R. (2018). A theoretical framework for the critical posthumanities. Theory, Culture & Society.
  11. Brown, R., & Carasso, H. (2013). Everything for sale: The marketization of UK higher education. London: Routledge/Society for Research into Higher Education.Google Scholar
  12. Cajete, G. (1994). Look to the mountain: An ecology of indigenous education. Skyland, NC: Kivaki Press.Google Scholar
  13. Cantwell, B., & Kauppinen, I. (2014). Academic capitalism in the age of globalization. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Carrigan, M. (2016). The accelerated academy. Retrieved from Accessed 18 December 2018.
  15. Collini, S. (2017). Speaking of universities. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  16. de Freitas, E., & Sinclair, N. (2012). Diagram, gesture, agency: Theorizing embodiment in the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(1/2), 133–152.Google Scholar
  17. Deleuze, G. (2006). The fold. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  18. Doel, M. A. (1996). A hundred thousand lines of flight: A machinic introduction to the nomad thought and scrumpled geography of Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 14(4), 421–439.Google Scholar
  19. Donald, D. (2009). Forts, curriculum, and indigenous metissage: Imagining decolonization of aboriginal-canadian relations in educational contexts. First Nations Perspectives, 2(1), 1–24.Google Scholar
  20. Gabriel, D., & Tate, S. A. (Eds.). (2017). Inside the ivory tower: Narratives of women of colour surviving and thriving in British academia. London: Trentham Books.Google Scholar
  21. Giroux, H. (2014). Neoliberalism’s war on higher education. Chicago: Haymarket Books.Google Scholar
  22. Gray van Heerden, C. (2018). #Itmustallfall, or, pedagogy for a people to come. In V. Bozalek, R. Braidotti, T. Shefer, & M. Zembylas (Eds.), Socially just pedagogies: Posthumanist, feminist and materialist perspectives in higher education. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  23. Greene, M. (1977). Toward wide-awakeness: An argument for the arts and humanities in education. Issues in Focus, 79(1), 119–125.Google Scholar
  24. Haraway, D. (2010). Otherworldly conversations, terran topics, local terms. In S. Alaimo & S. Hekman (Eds.), Material feminisms (pp. 157–187). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the trouble. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Hinton, P., & van der Tuin, I. (2014). Preface. Women: A Cultural Review, 25(1), 1–8.Google Scholar
  27. Hinton, P., Mehrabi, T., & Barla, J. (2014). New materialisms/new colonialisms. Position paper for New Materialisms: How Matter Comes to Matter. COST. ISI3017. Retrieved from
  28. Hlavajova, M. (2015, August 26). Critique-as-proposition: Thinking about, with, and through art in our time. Utrecht: University of Utrecht.Google Scholar
  29. Ingold, T. (2011). Being alive. Essays on movement, knowledge and description. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Jackson, C., Dempster, S., & Pollard, L. (2015). ‘They just don’t seem to really care, they just think it’s cool to sit there and talk’: Laddism in university teaching-learning contexts. Educational Review, 67(3), 300–314.Google Scholar
  31. Koro-Ljungberg, M. (2016). Reconceptualizing qualitative research. Methodologies without methodology. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  32. Lindqvist, S. (1997). Exterminate all the brutes. London: Granta Publications.Google Scholar
  33. Manning, E., & Massumi, B. (2014). Thought in the act: Passages of ecology of experience. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Marginson, S. (2017). Limitations of human capital theory. Studies in Higher Education.
  35. Massumi, B. (1988). Translator’s foreword. Pleasure of philosophy. In G. Deleuze & F. Guattari (Eds.), A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  36. Naidoo, R. (2016). The competition fetish in higher education: Varieties, animators and consequences. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 37(1), 1–10.Google Scholar
  37. Nxumalo, F., & Cedillo, S. (2017). Decolonizing place in early childhood studies: Thinking with indigenous onto-epistemologies and Black feminist geographies. Global Studies of Childhood, 7(2), 99–112.Google Scholar
  38. Panelli, R. (2010). More-than-human social geographies: Posthuman and other possibilities. Progress in Human Geography, 34(3), 79–87.Google Scholar
  39. Phipps, A. (2018). Reckoning up: Sexual harassment and violence in the neoliberal university. Gender and Education.
  40. Rosiek, J., & Snyder, J. (2018). Narrative inquiry and new materialism: Stories as (not necessarily benign) agents. Qualitative Inquiry, 1–12.
  41. Smith, L. T. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  42. Spinoza, B. (2002). Ethics. London: Everyman.Google Scholar
  43. Stengers, I. (2018). Another science is possible: A manifesto for slow science. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  44. Stewart, K. (2007). Ordinary affects. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Sundberg, J. (2014). Decolonizing posthumanist geographies. Cultural Geographies, 21(1), 33–47.Google Scholar
  46. Sword, H. (2017). Air and light and time and space: How successful academics write. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Tamboukou, M. (2018). The joy of learning: Feminist materialist pedagogies and the freedom of education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 50(9), 868–877.Google Scholar
  48. Taylor, C. A. (2012). Student engagement, practice architectures and phronesis in the student transitions and experiences project. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 4(2), 109–125.Google Scholar
  49. Taylor, C. A. (2016a). Edu-crafting a cacophonous ecology: Posthuman research practices for education. In C. A. Taylor & C. Hughes (Eds.), Posthuman research practices in education (pp. 7–36). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  50. Taylor, C. A. (2016b). Close encounters of a critical kind: A diffractive musing in/between new material feminism and object-oriented ontology. Cultural Studies—Critical Methodologies, 16(2), 201–212.Google Scholar
  51. Taylor, C. A. (2018). Edu-crafting posthumanist adventures in/for higher education: A speculative musing. Parallax, 24(3), 371–381.Google Scholar
  52. Taylor, C. A., & Hughes, C. (Eds.). (2016). Posthuman research practices in education. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  53. Todd, Z. (2016). An indigenous feminist’s take on the ontological turn: ‘Ontology’ is just another word for colonialism. Journal of Historical Sociology, 29(1), 4–22.Google Scholar
  54. Tuck, E., & Yang, K. W. (2012). Decolonization is not a metaphor. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 1(1), 1–40.Google Scholar
  55. Van der Tuin, I. (2015). Generational feminism: New materialist introduction to a generative approach. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  56. Watermeyer, R. (2019). Competitive accountability in academic life: The struggle for social impact and public legitimacy. Author’s pre-publication copy.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EducationUniversity of BathBathUK

Personalised recommendations