Advertisement

The Relevance of Climate Change Related Risks on Corporate Financial and Non-Financial Disclosure in Italian Listed Companies

  • Paola De BernardiEmail author
  • Francesco Venuti
  • Alberto Bertello
Chapter

Abstract

Climate change (CC) is undoubtedly an increasing issue on the agenda of politicians, scientists, mass-media, and academics. The Financial Stability Board (FSB) set up a Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) to establish a set of recommendations for consistent and material “disclosures that will help financial market participants understand their climate risks”. Companies have to adopt serious actions to measure and manage this potential risk that may deeply affect their businesses. This paper aims at investigating, through the lens of the legitimacy theory, how and to what extent the biggest Italian nonfinancial companies of the FTSE-MIB disclose on Climate change risk, what is the level of depth of their disclosure and their level of preparation and adherence to the TCFD guidelines.

Keywords

Climate change Climate-related risk Risk management Task force on climate-related financial disclosures (TFCFD) Sustainability disclosure 

Bibliography

  1. Abraham, S., & Cox, P. (2007). Analysing the determinants of narrative risk information in UK FTSE 100 annual reports. The British Accounting Review, 39(3), 227–248.Google Scholar
  2. Alfiero, S., Cane, M., De Bernardi, P., & Venuti, F. (2016). Investigating risk disclosure practices in European listed companies: What’s going on about reputational risk? In L. Marchi, R. Lombardi, & L. Anselmi (Eds.), Il governo aziendale tra tradizione e innovazione (pp. 47–70). Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
  3. Barako, D. G., Hancock, P., & Izan, H. Y. (2006). Factors influencing voluntary corporate disclosure by Kenyan companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(2), 107–125.Google Scholar
  4. Baumeister, S. (2018). We are still in! Conference report from the 2018 Ceres Conference. Journal of Cleaner Production, 196, 183–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Botosan, C. A. (1997). Disclosure level and the cost of equity capital. Accounting Review, 323–349.Google Scholar
  6. Brody, S. D., Zahran, S., Vedlitz, A., & Grover, H. (2008). Examining the relationship between physical vulnerability and public perceptions of global climate change in the United States. Environment and Behavior, 40(1), 72–95.Google Scholar
  7. Bui, B., & De Villiers, C. (2017). Business strategies and management accounting in response to climate change risk exposure and regulatory uncertainty. The British Accounting Review, 49(1), 4–24.Google Scholar
  8. Burritt, R. L., Schaltegger, S., & Zvezdov, D. (2011). Carbon management accounting: Explaining practice in leading German companies. Australian Accounting Review, 21(1), 80–98.Google Scholar
  9. Busch, T., Berger, S. G., & Paquin, R. (2012). Managing for climate risk. In D. R. Gallagher (Ed.), Environmental leadership: A reference handbook (pp. 527–535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Campbell, D., Craven, B., & Shrives, P. (2003). Voluntary social reporting in three FTSE sectors: A comment on perception and legitimacy. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 16(4), 558–581.Google Scholar
  11. Carlon, S., Loftus, J., & Miller, M. (2003). The challenge of risk reporting: Regulatory and corporate responses. Australian Accounting Review, 13(31), 36–51.Google Scholar
  12. Chowdhury, R. B., & Moore, G. A. (2017). Floating agriculture: A potential cleaner production technique for climate change adaptation and sustainable community development in Bangladesh. Journal of Cleaner Production, 150, 371–389.Google Scholar
  13. Climate Disclosure Standards Board. (2018). Framework for reporting environmental information, natural capital and associated business impacts. Retrieved from https://www.cdsb.net/sites/default/files/cdsb_framework_2.1.pdf.
  14. De Aguiar, T. R. S., & Bebbington, J. (2014). Disclosure on climate change: Analysing the UK ETS effects. Accounting Forum, 38(4), 227–240.Google Scholar
  15. Deegan, C. (2006). Legitimacy theory. In Z. Hogue (Ed.), Methodological issues in accounting research: Theories and methods (pp. 161–182). London: Spiramus Press.Google Scholar
  16. Deegan, C. (2010). Organizational legitimacy as a motive for sustainability reporting. In J. Unerman, J. Bebbington, & B. O’Dwyer (Eds.), Sustainability accounting and accountability (pp. 146–168). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Depoers, F. (2000). A cost benefit study of voluntary disclosure: Some empirical evidence from French listed companies. European Accounting Review, 9(2), 245–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dilling, P. F., & Harris, P. (2018). Reporting on long-term value creation by Canadian companies: A longitudinal assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 191, 350–360.Google Scholar
  19. Eccles, R., & Krzus, M. (2017). An analysis of oil & gas company disclosures from the perspective of the task force on climate-related financial disclosures. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=3091232.
  20. Engel, H., Enkvist, P. A., & Henderson, K. (2015). How companies can adapt to climate change. Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/sustainability-and-resource-productivity/our-insights/how-companies-can-adapt-to-climate-change.
  21. Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Gasbarro, F., Iraldo, F., & Daddi, T. (2017). The drivers of multinational enterprises’ climate change strategies: A quantitative study on climate-related risks and opportunities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 160, 8–26.Google Scholar
  23. Gray, R., Kouhy, R., & Lavers, S. (1995). Constructing a research database of social and environmental reporting by UK companies. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 8(2), 78–101.Google Scholar
  24. Hallenberg, A. (2015). Climate change and financial market efficiency. Business and Society, 54, 511–539.Google Scholar
  25. Hopkins, D., & Maclean, K. (2014). Climate change perceptions and responses in Scotland’s ski industry. Tourism Geographies, 16(3), 400–414.Google Scholar
  26. International Investors Group for Climate Change. (2018, June). Statement from the coalition for higher ambition. Retrieved from http://www.iigcc.org/publications/publication/iigcc-joins-businesses-and-civil-society-to-call-for-greater-eu-climate-amb.
  27. ISO—International Organization for Standardization. (2018). Risk management ISO 31000. Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/iso-31000-risk-management.html.
  28. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2014). Climate change 2014: Synthesis report: Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva: IPCC.Google Scholar
  29. Jakob, M., & Steckel, J. C. (2016). Implications of climate change mitigation for sustainable development. Environmental Research Letters, 11(10), 1–9.Google Scholar
  30. Johannsdottir, L. (2014). The Geneva Association framework for climate change actions of insurers: A case study of Nordic insurers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 75, 20–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kolk, A., & Pinkse, J. (2005). Business responses to climate change: Identifying emergent strategies. California Management Review, 47(3), 6–20.Google Scholar
  32. Kouloukoui, D., da Silva Gomes, S. M., de Oliveira Marinho, M. M., Torres, E. A., Kiperstok, A., & de Jong, P. (2018). Disclosure of climate risk information by the world’s largest companies. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 23, 1–29.Google Scholar
  33. Kunreuther, H., Heal, G., Allen, M., Edenhofer, O., Field, C. B., & Yohe, G. (2013). Risk management and climate change. Nature Climate Change, 3(5), 447.Google Scholar
  34. Lash, J., & Wellington, F. (2007). Competitive advantage on a warming planet. Harvard Business Review, 85(3), 94–102.Google Scholar
  35. Lee, S. Y. (2012). Corporate carbon strategies in responding to climate change. Business Strategy and the Environment, 21(1), 33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Levy, D. L., & Kolk, A. (2002). Strategic responses to global climate change: Conflicting pressures on multinationals in the oil industry. Business and Politics, 4(3), 275–300.Google Scholar
  37. Meinel, U., & Abegg, B. (2017). A multi-level perspective on climate risks and drivers of entrepreneurial robustness-findings from sectoral comparison in alpine Austria. Global Environmental Change, 44, 68–82.Google Scholar
  38. Mills, E. (2009). A global review of insurance industry responses to climate change. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance-Issues and Practice, 34(3), 323–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Raghavan, R. S. (2005). Risk management in SMEs. The Chartered Accountant, 54(4), 528–535.Google Scholar
  40. Rogelj, J., Den Elzen, M., Höhne, N., Fransen, T., Fekete, H., Winkler, H., … Meinshausen, M. (2016). Paris agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2°C. Nature, 534(7609), 631–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sakhel, A. (2017). Corporate climate risk management: Are European companies prepared? Journal of Cleaner Production, 165, 103–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures. (2017). Recommendations of the task force on climate-related financial disclosures. Retrieved from https://www.fsb-tcfd.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/FINAL-TCFD-Report-062817.pdf.
  43. Testa, F., Todaro, M. N., Iraldo, F., Gasbarro, F., & Ianna, R. (2017). Assessing climate change mitigation and adaptation efforts in the Italian industry: The results of an explorative study. Italian of Environmental and Protection of Land and Sea. Retrieved from http://www.minambiente.it/pagina/marrakech-partnership-global-climate-action.
  44. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (2018). The Paris agreement. Retrieved from https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement/the-paris-agreement.
  45. Verrecchia, R. E. (2001). Essays on disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32(1–3), 97–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Weinhofer, G., & Busch, T. (2013). Corporate strategies for managing climate risks. Business Strategy and the Environment, 22(2), 121–144.Google Scholar
  47. Weinhofer, G., & Hoffmann, V. H. (2010). Mitigating climate change-how do corporate strategies differ? Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(2), 77–89.Google Scholar
  48. Winn, M., Kirchgeorg, M., Griffiths, A., Linnenluecke, M. K., & Günther, E. (2011). Impacts from climate change on organizations: A conceptual foundation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20(3), 157–173.Google Scholar
  49. Wittneben, B. B., & Kiyar, D. (2009). Climate change basics for managers. Management Decision, 47(7), 1122–1132.Google Scholar
  50. Ziegler, A., Busch, T., & Hoffmann, V. H. (2011). Disclosed corporate responses to climate change and stock performance: An empirical analysis. Energy Economics, 33(6), 1283–1294.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paola De Bernardi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Francesco Venuti
    • 2
  • Alberto Bertello
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ManagementUniversity of TurinTurinItaly
  2. 2.ESCP EUROPEParisFrance

Personalised recommendations