Advertisement

The Path to Quantum Mechanics

  • Gerhard EckerEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Undergraduate Lecture Notes in Physics book series (ULNP)

Abstract

Niels Bohr finished his studies at the University of Copenhagen in 1911 with a thesis on the magnetic properties of metals. In September of the same year he went to Cambridge to continue his studies at the famous Cavendish Laboratories with Thomson. Thomson received him cordially and seemed to be interested in the work of the young Dane. However, in the literature one can find the cryptic remark that their communication was hampered by language barriers; maybe Thomson’s knowledge of Danish was only rudimentary ...While Bohr still had to grapple with these difficulties, Rutherford visited Cambridge and reported on his new insights concerning the structure of atoms. Bohr was fascinated by Rutherford and decided to move to Manchester. To the surprise of many colleagues soon also Rutherford was quite impressed by Bohr. This was not necessarily to be expected because in general Rutherford did not have a very favourable opinion of “pure” theoreticians. After all, he had not needed a theoretician to deduce the structure of atoms from the scattering experiments in Manchester. When asked why he made an exception for Bohr, he is reported to have said: “Bohr is different, he is a football player.”

References

  1. Anderson CD (1932) Science 76:238ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bohr N (1913) Phil Mag 26, 1; ibid. 476; ibid. 857Google Scholar
  3. Born M (1926) Z Phys 37:863ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Born M, Heisenberg W, Jordan P (1925) Z Phys 35:557ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Compton AH (1923) Phys Rev 21:483ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davisson C, Germer LH (1927) Nature 119:558ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. de Broglie L (1925) Ann de Physique 3:22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Demtröder W (2010) Experimentalphysik 3: Atome, Moleküle und Festkörper. Springer Spektrum, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  9. Dirac PAM (1927) Proc Royal Soc A 113:621Google Scholar
  10. Dirac PAM (1928) Proc Royal Soc A 117:610Google Scholar
  11. Einstein A, Born H, Born M (1969) Briefwechsel 1916–1955. Nymphenburger Verlagshandlung, MünchenzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Franck J, Hertz G (1914) Verhandlungen der Deutschen Phys Ges 16:457Google Scholar
  13. Gerlach W, Stern O (1922) Z Phys 9:349ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Heisenberg W (1925) Z Phys 33:879ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Heisenberg W (1927) Z Phys 43:172ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Oppenheimer JR (1930) Phys Rev 35:562ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pakvasa S (2018) The Stern-Gerlach experiment and the electron spin. arXiv:1805.09412
  18. Pauli W (1925) Z Phys 31:765ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pauli W (1926) Z Phys 36:336ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pauli W (1927) Z Phys 43:601ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pauli W (1979) Wissenschaftlicher Briefwechsel mit Bohr, Einstein, Heisenberg u. a., vol I. In: Hermann A, von Meyenn K, Weisskopf V (eds) Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  22. Schrödinger E (1926a) Ann Phys 79:361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schrödinger E (1926b) Ann Phys 79:734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Thomson GP, Reid A (1927) Nature 119:890ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Uhlenbeck GE (1976) 50 years of spin: personal reminiscences. Phys Today 29:43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Uhlenbeck GE, Goudsmit SA (1925) Naturwissenschaften 13:953ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fakultät für PhysikUniversität WienViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations