Advertisement

The Accidental Pragmatist: Jonathan Haidt’s Moral Psychology as Pragmatic Popular Science

  • Jeremy SmyczekEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

While much of the work of rhetorical pragmatists has involved explicating the value of foundational pragmatist thinkers such as John Dewey and William James to new generations of scholars in composition and communication studies, less work has been devoted to seeing how contemporary scholars outside of the humanities already use these thinkers in ways that may nevertheless be fruitful for the study of language and discourse. This essay argues that the moral psychologist Jonathan Haidt provides an example of this less-explored category, using pragmatist influences in combination with modern empirical methods to articulate a theory of communication that offers tools for enhanced understanding of the psychology underlying rhetorical discourse.

References

  1. Berg, Chris. 2012. “Why Can’t We All Just Get Along?” Review of The Righteous Mind, by Jonathan Haidt. Institute of Public Affairs Review 64 (2): 60–62. http://ipa.org.au.
  2. Cavell, Stanley. 2009. “What’s the Use of Calling Emerson a Pragmatist?” In The Revival of Pragmatism: New Essays on Social Thought, Law, and Culture, edited by Morris Dickstein, 72–82. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Christensen, Bryce. 2012. “Review of The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion, by Jonathan Haidt.” Booklist, 6. March 15.Google Scholar
  4. Crick, Nathan. 2010. Democracy and Rhetoric: John Dewey on the Arts of Becoming. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  5. Dewey, John. 1927 [1954]. The Public and Its Problems. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
  6. ———. 1934 [2005]. Art as Experience. New York: Perigee.Google Scholar
  7. ———. 1938 [1949]. Logic: The Theory of Inquiry. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
  8. DeWitt, Iain. 2013. “Moral Matter.” Review of Braintrust by Patricia Churchland, The Righteous Mind by Jonathan Haidt, Why Everyone (Else) Is a Hypocrite by Robert Kurzban, and Who’s in Charge? by Michael S. Gazzaniga. The American Interest 8 (4): 72–79.Google Scholar
  9. Dickstein, Morris, ed. 1998. The Revival of Pragmatism: New Essays on Social Thought, Law, and Culture. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Fromm, Harold. 2013. “Groping for Groups.” Review of The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion, by Jonathan Haidt. Hudson Review 65 (4): 652–658. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43489291.
  11. Goldman, Jason G. 2012. “‘Blooming, Buzzing Confusion’—But Who Is Confused?” The Thoughtful Animal (blog), Scientific American, July 26. http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/thoughtful-animal/blooming-buzzing-confusion-but-who-is-confused/.
  12. Goodnight, G. Thomas. 2012. “The Personal, Technical, and Public Spheres of Argument: A Speculative Inquiry into the Art of Public Deliberation.” Argumentation and Advocacy 48: 198–210.Google Scholar
  13. Graham, Jesse, Jonathan Haidt, Sena Koleva, Matt Motyl, Ravi Iyer, Sean P. Wojcik, and Peter H. Ditto. 2013. “Moral Foundations Theory: The Pragmatic Validity of Moral Pluralism.” In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 47, edited by Patricia Devine and Ashby Plant, 55–130. Elsevier.  https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-407236-7.00002-4.
  14. Haidt, Jonathan. 2001. “The Emotional Dog and Its Rational Tail: A Social Intuitionist Approach to Moral Judgment.” Psychological Review 108 (4): 814–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. ———. 2006. The Happiness Hypothesis: Finding Modern Truth in Ancient Wisdom. New York: Basic-Perseus.Google Scholar
  16. ———. 2012. The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  17. Hanlon, Aaron. 2015. “The Trigger Warning Myth.” The New Republic, August 14. http://newrepublic.com/article/122543/trigger-warning-myth.
  18. Harris, Sam. 2011. The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  19. Hawks, John. 2010. “The ‘Blooming, Buzzing Confusion’ of William James.” John Hawks Weblog, April 30. http://johnhawks.net/weblog/topics/minds/baby/james-blooming-buzzing-baby-2010.html. Accessed 16 May 2018.
  20. Hickman, Larry A. 2009. “Why American Philosophy? Why Now?” European Journal of American Philosophy 1 (1): 1–3.Google Scholar
  21. Hildebrand, David L. 1995. “Was Kenneth Burke a Pragmatist?” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 31 (3): 632–658.Google Scholar
  22. James, William. 1961 [1902]. The Varieties of Religious Experience. New York, NY: New American Library.Google Scholar
  23. ———. 1968. The Writings of William James, edited by John McDermott. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  24. Jensen, Robert. 2016. “The Coddling of the Capitalist, White-Supremacist, Patriarchal American Mind.” Crossing Genres (blog), Medium, March 7. http://crossingenres.com/the-coddling-of-the-capitalist-white-supremacist-patriarchal-american-mind-ca80a5891361. Accessed 26 May 2018.
  25. Keith, William, and Robert Danisch. 2014. “Dewey on Science, Deliberation, and the Sociology of Rhetoric.” In Trained Capacities: John Dewey, Rhetoric, and Democratic Practice, edited by Brian Jackson and Gregory Clark, 27–46. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Krause, Sharon. 2008. Civil Passions: Moral Sentiment and Democratic Deliberation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lukianoff, Greg, and Jonathan Haidt. 2015. “The Coddling of the American Mind.” The Atlantic, September 2015. http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2015/09/the-coddling-of-the-american-mind/399356/.
  28. Olson, Gary. 1994. “Fish Tales: A Conversation with ‘The Contemporary Sophist.’” In There’s No Such Thing as Free Speech, and It’s a Good Thing, Too, edited by Stanley Fish, 281–307. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Palumbo-Liu, David. 2015. “Coddled Students? That’s Not the Problem.” Huffpost: The Blog, September 2. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-palumboliu/coddled-students-thats-not-the-problem_b_8080166.html.
  30. Peirce, Charles Saunders. 1905. “Issues of Pragmaticism.” The Monist XV (4): 481–499. http://archive.org/stream/monistquart15hegeuoft#page/480/mode/1up.
  31. Shook, John. 2018. “The Eclipse of Pragmatism?” In Pragmatism Cybrary, edited by John Shook. http://www.pragmatism.org/.
  32. ———. “Where Have Pragmatists Come From? A Pragmatic Genealogy.” In Pragmatism Cybrary, edited by John Shook. http://www.pragmatism.org/genealogy.htm.
  33. Sleeper, Jim. 2016. “The Coddling of the Conservative Mind.” Salon, January 13. http://www.salon.com/2016/01/13/the_coddling_of_the_conservative_mind/.
  34. Stob, Paul. 2013. William James and the Art of the Popular Statement. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Stroud, Scott. 2011. John Dewey and the Artful Life: Pragmatism. Aesthetics, and Morality. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
  36. West, Cornel. 1989. The American Evasion of Philosophy: A Genealogy of Pragmatism. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.St. Bonaventure UniversityAlleganyUSA

Personalised recommendations