Advertisement

A Multi-portfolio Approach to Integrated Risk-Averse Planning in Supply Chains Under Disruption Risks

  • Tadeusz SawikEmail author
Chapter
Part of the International Series in Operations Research & Management Science book series (ISOR, volume 276)

Abstract

This chapter presents a multi-portfolio approach for the time and space integrated decision-making in a supply chain under disruption risks. In the context of supply chain disruptions, the portfolio is defined as the allocation of demand for parts among suppliers or the allocation of demand for products among production facilities. A disruptive event is assumed to impact both primary suppliers of parts and the firm primary assembly plant. Then, the firm selects recovery suppliers, recovery plants along with transshipment of parts from disabled primary plant to recovery plants and production and inventory planning in recovery plants. The mitigation and recovery decisions are integrated over time and space: the primary portfolios to be implemented before a disruptive event are optimized simultaneously with recovery portfolios for the aftermath period as well as the portfolios for both part suppliers and product manufacturers in different geographic regions are determined simultaneously. Using conditional cost at risk and conditional service at risk as risk measures, the risk-averse solutions are obtained. The solution results are compared for different demand patterns. The findings indicate that when the objective is to optimize service level with no regard to costs, both supply and demand portfolios are more diversified. The findings also demonstrate that the developed multi-portfolio approach leads to computationally efficient stochastic MIP models with a very strong LP relaxation. The proposed multi-portfolio approach that allows for the time and space integrated decision-making may help to better mitigate the impact of disruption propagation on supply chain performance, i.e., the ripple effect.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author wishes to thank the editors for their invitation to contribute to this handbook.

References

  1. Basole, R., & Bellamy, M. (2014). Supply network structure, visibility, and risk diffusion: A computational approach. Decision Sciences, 45(4), 753–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Birge, J. R., & Louveaux, F. (2011). Introduction to stochastic programming. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blackhurst, J., Dunn, K. S., & Craighead, C. W. (2011). An empirically derived framework of global supply resiliency. Journal of Business Logistics, 32(4), 374–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dolgui, A., Ivanov, D., & Sokolov, B. (2018). Ripple effect in the supply chain: An analysis and recent literature. International Journal of Production Research, 56(1–2), 414–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ivanov, D. (2018). Structural dynamics and resilience in supply chain risk management. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ivanov, D., Sokolov, B., & Dolgui, A. (2014a). The ripple effect in supply chains: trade-off ‘Efficiency-Flexibility-Resilience’ in disruption management. International Journal of Production Research, 52(7), 2154–2172.Google Scholar
  7. Ivanov, D., Sokolov, B., & Pavlov, A. (2014b). Optimal distribution (re)planning in a centralized multi-stage supply network under conditions of the ripple effect and structure dynamics. European Journal of Operational Research, 237(2), 758–770.Google Scholar
  8. Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A., Sokolov, B., & Ivanova, M. (2017). Literature review on disruption recovery in the supply chain. International Journal of Production Research, 55(20), 6158–6174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Liberatore, F., Scaparra, M. P., & Daskin, M. S. (2012). Hedging against disruptions with ripple effects in location analysis. Omega, 40(1), 21–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. MacKenzie, C. A., Barker, K., & Santos, J. R. (2014). Modeling a severe supply chain disruption and post-disaster decision making with application to the Japanese earthquake and tsunami. IIE Transactions, 46(12), 1243–1260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Marszewska, J. R. (2016). Implications of seismic hazard in Japan on Toyota supply chain disruption risks. In Proceedings of 13th International Conference on Industrial Logistics, Zakopane, Poland (pp. 178–185).Google Scholar
  12. Matsuo, H. (2015). Implications of the Tohoku earthquake for Toyota’s coordination mechanism: Supply chain disruption of automotive semiconductors. International Journal of Production Economics, 161, 217–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Meena, P. L., Sarmah, S. P., & Sarkar, A. (2014). Sourcing decisions under risks of catastrophic event disruptions. Transportation Research Part E, 47, 1058–1074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Namdar, J., Li, X., Sawhney, R., & Pradhan, N. (2018). Supply chain resilience for single and multiple sourcing in the presence of disruption risks. International Journal of Production Research, 56(6), 2339–2360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Park, Y., Hong, P., & Roh, J. J. (2013). Supply chain lessons from the catastrophic natural disaster in Japan. Business Horizon, 56(1), 75–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ruiz-Torres, A. J., Mahmoodi, F., & Zeng, A. Z. (2013). Supplier selection model with contingency planning for supplier failures. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 66, 374–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rajagopal, V., Venkatesan, S. P., & Goh, M. (2017). Decision-making models for supply chain risk mitigation: A review. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 113, 646–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sawik, T. (2011a). Scheduling in supply chains using mixed integer programming. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sawik, T. (2011b). Selection of supply portfolio under disruption risks. Omega, 39, 194–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sawik, T. (2011c). Selection of a dynamic supply portfolio in make-to-order environment with risks. Computers and Operations Research, 38(4), 782–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sawik, T. (2013a). Selection of resilient supply portfolio under disruption risks. Omega, 41, 259–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sawik, T. (2013b). Integrated selection of suppliers and scheduling of customer orders in the presence of supply chain disruption risks. International Journal of Production Research, 51(23–24), 7006–7022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sawik, T. (2014). Joint supplier selection and scheduling of customer orders under disruption risks: Single vs. dual sourcing. Omega, 43(2), 83–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sawik, T. (2015). Integrated supply chain scheduling under multi-level disruptions. IFAC-Papers On Line, 48(3), 1515–1520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sawik, T. (2016). Integrated supply, production and distribution scheduling under disruption risks. Omega, 62, 131–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sawik, T. (2017). A portfolio approach to supply chain disruption management. International Journal of Production Research, 55(7), 1970–1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sawik, T. (2018a). Supply chain disruption management using stochastic mixed integer programming. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  28. Sawik, T. (2018b). Selection of a dynamic supply portfolio under delay and disruption risks. International Journal of Production Research, 56(1–2), 760–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sawik, T. (2018c). Two-period vs. multi-period model for supply chain disruption management. International Journal of Production Research.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1504246. Article in press.
  30. Sawik, T. (2019). Disruption mitigation and recovery in supply chains using portfolio approach. Omega, 84, 232–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Scheibe, K. P., & Blackhurst, J. (2018). Supply chain disruption propagation: A systemic risk and normal accident theory perspective. International Journal of Production Research, 56(1–2), 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Simchi-Levi, D., Schmidt, W., Wei, Y., Zhang, P. J., Combs, K., Ge, Y., et al. (2015). Identifying risks and mitigating disruptions in the automotive supply chain. Interfaces, 45(5), 375–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Snyder, L. V., Atan, Z., Peng, P., Rong, Y., Schmitt, A., & Sinsoysal, B. (2016). OR/MS models for supply chain disruptions: A review. IIE Transactions, 48(2), 89–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Torabi, S. A., Baghersad, M., & Mansouri, S. A. (2015). Resilient supplier selection and order allocation under operational and disruption risks. Transportation Research Part E, 79, 22–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yoon, J., Talluri, S., Yildiz, H., & Ho, W. (2018). Models for supplier selection and risk mitigation: A holistic approach. International Journal of Production Research, 56(10), 3636–3661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Operations ResearchAGH University of Science & TechnologyKrakówPoland

Personalised recommendations