Advertisement

Turkish Party System Through Volatile Social and Political Cleavages

  • Sevinç Bermek
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter looks at the evolution of the Turkish party system by introducing the Lipset-Rokkan’s cleavage structure and updating it for the contemporary Turkish context. The chapter analyses cleavages that characterise the Turkish political system that consisted of the centre-periphery, left-right, secularist-Islamist, Turkish-Kurdish, as well as sub-cleavages. It describes the background of these cleavages and how they have translated into political parties since the establishment of the Republic. It also demonstrates how ethnic and identity claims became apparent at the beginning of the twenty-first century. In line with dynamic cleavages, the chapter also provides clues on how the Islamic-rooted Justice and Development Party (Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi, JDP) managed to capitalise on different cleavages through a policy agenda that in turn helped Recep Tayyip Erdoğan to gain a foothold in 2002.

References

  1. Ağırdır, B. (2007, July 22). Elections ’07 What Determined the Contents of the Ballot Box? Konda Araştırma, [online]. Available at: http://konda.com.tr/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/2007_07_KONDA_What_determined_the_contents_of_the_ballot_box.pdf. Accessed 29 Oct 2018.
  2. Ahmad, F. (1993). The Making of Modern Turkey. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Akarca, A., & Tansel, A. (2007). Social and Economic Determinants of Turkish Voter Choice in the 1995 Parliamentary Election. Electoral Studies, 26, 633–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Akın, E., & Karasapan, Ö. (1988). The “Turkish-Islamic” Synthesis. Middle East Report, Islam and the State, 153(July–August), 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Akkaya, A. H. (2013). Kürt hareketinin örgütlenme süreci olarak 1970’ler. Toplum ve Bilim (Society and Science), [online]. Available at: https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/4109742. Accessed 29 Apr 2018.
  6. Akşin, S. (1999). The Nature of the Kemalist Revolution. UNAT (United Nations Association of Turkey) Bulletin, [online]. Available at: http://www.unaturkey.org/dergiler-bulletins/38-say-02-number-02-october-1999-/58-the-nature-of-the-kemalist-revolution-.pdf. Accessed 29 Apr 2018.
  7. Aktürk, Ş. (2012). Regimes of Ethnicity and Nationhood in Germany, Russia, and Turkey. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Albayrak, M. (2004). Türk Siyasi Tarihinde Demokrat Parti (1946–1960) (The Democratic Party in Turkish Political History). Ankara: Phoenix.Google Scholar
  9. Almond, G. A. (1956). Comparative Political Systems. The Journal of Politics, 18(3), 391–409.Google Scholar
  10. Atacan, F. (2005). Explaining Religious Politics at the Crossroad: AKP-SP. Turkish Studies, 6(2), 187–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Baban, C. (1970). Politika Galerisi. Istanbul: Remzi Kitabevi.Google Scholar
  12. Bacık, G., & Çoşkun, B. B. (2013). Explaining Turkey’s Failure to Develop a Political Solution for the Kurdish Problem. In F. Bilgin & A. Sarıhan (Eds.), Understanding Turkey’s Kurdish Question (pp. 141–165). Plymouth: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  13. Bakırezer, G., & ve Demirer, Y. (2009). AKP’nin Sosyal Siyaseti (AKP’s Social Policy). In İ. Uzgel & B. Duru (Eds.), AKP Kitabı: Bir Dönüşümün Bilançosu (A Book on the AKP: The Balance Sheet of a Transformation) (pp. 153–179). Ankara: Phoenixkitap.Google Scholar
  14. Bali, R. N. (1998). Cumhuriyet Döneminde Azınlıklar Politikası. Birikim (115), [online]. Available at: http://www.birikimdergisi.com/birikim-yazi/6372/cumhuriyet-doneminde-azinliklar-politikasi#.Wudyta2ZNp8. Accessed 29 Apr 2018.
  15. Bayır, D. (2013). Minorities and Nationalism in Turkish Law. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Berkeş, N. (1998). The Development of Secularism in Turkey. London: Hurst and Company.Google Scholar
  17. Beşikçi, I. (2004). International Colony Kurdistan. London: Parvana/Taderon Press.Google Scholar
  18. Bianet. (2011a, October 24). BDP Binalarına Saldırılar Beş Gündür Devam Ediyor. Bianet, [online]. Available at: https://bianet.org/bianet/toplum/133612-bdp-binalarina-saldirilar-bes-gundur-devam-ediyor. Accessed 29 Oct 2018.
  19. Bianet. (2011b, October 11). 37 Kişi Tutuklandı. Bianet, [online]. Available at: https://m.bianet.org/bianet/siyaset/133245-37-kisi-tutuklandi. Accessed 29 Oct 2018.
  20. Bilâ, H. (2008). CHP 1919–2009. İstanbul: Doğan Kitap.Google Scholar
  21. Bozarslan, H. (2008). Kürd Milliyetçiliği ve Kürd Hareketi (1898–2000). In T. Bora (Ed.), Modern Türkiye’de Siyasi Düşünce: Miliyetçilik (pp. 841–870). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.Google Scholar
  22. Buğra, A. (2010). Devlet ve İşadamları (State and Businessmen in Modern Turkey). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.Google Scholar
  23. Burdy, J., & Marcou, J. (1995). Laïcité, Laiklik. CEMOTI (Cahiers d’Études sur la Méditerranée Orientale et le Monde Turco-iranien) (19), 1–26.Google Scholar
  24. Caramani, D. (2007). Comparative Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Çarkoğlu, A. (2005). Political Preferences of the Turkish Electorate: Reflections of an Alevi–Sunni Cleavage. Turkish Studies, 6(2), 273–292.Google Scholar
  26. Çavdar, T. (2008). Türkiye’nin Demokrasi Tarihi 1950’den Günümüze (Turkey’s History of Democracy from 1950 to the Present). Ankara: İmge Kitapevi.Google Scholar
  27. Cizre-Sakallıoğlu, Ü. (1992). Labour and State in Turkey: 1960–80. Middle Eastern Studies, 28(4), 712–772.Google Scholar
  28. Criss, N. B. (2002). A Short History of Anti-Americanism and Terrorism: The Turkish Case. The Journal of American History, 89, 472–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Çulhaoğlu, M. (2010, August 20). 40 yıl önce Kürt sorunu. Birgün, [online]. Available at: http://www.birgun.net/haber-detay/40-yil-once-kurt-sorunu-15348.html. Accessed 29 Apr 2018.
  30. Dağı, İ. (2005). Transformation of Islamic Political Identity in Turkey: Rethinking the West and Westernization. Turkish Studies, 6(1), 21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Daldal, A. (2004). The New Middle Class as a Progressive Urban Coalition: The 1960 Coup d’etat in Turkey. Turkish Studies, 5(3), 75–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Demir, Ö., Acar, M., & Toprak, M. (2004). Anatolian Tigers of Islamic Capital: Prospects and Challenges. Middle Eastern Studies, 40, 166–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Doğan, A. E. (2009). İslamcı Sermayenin Gelişme Dinamikleri ve 28 Şubat Süreci (Dynamics of the Development of the Islamic Capital and 28th February Process). In İ. Uzgel & B. Duru (Eds.), AKP Kitabı: Bir Dönüşümün Bilançosu (A Book on the AKP: The Balance Sheet of a Transformation) (pp. 283–307). Ankara: Phoenixkitap.Google Scholar
  34. Freely, M. (2012). Crossing the Line. Index of Censorship, 41(3), 56–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Giddens, A. (1971). Capitalism and Modern Social Theory: An Analysis of the Writing of Marx, Durkheim and Max Weber. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gorgas, J. T. (2009). The Shared Political Production of ‘the East’ as a ‘Resistant’ Territory and Cultural Sphere in the Kemalist Era, 1923–1938. European Journal of Turkish Studies, 10, [online]. Available at: http://journals.openedition.org/ejts/4064. Accessed 20 Oct 2018.
  37. Grigoriadis, I. N. (2016). The Peoples’ Democratic Party (HDP) and the 2015 Elections. Turkish Studies, 17(1), 39–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gülalp, H. (2001). Globalization and Political Islam: The Social Bases of Turkey’s Welfare Party. Journal of Middle East Studies, 33(3), 433–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gumuscu, S. (2010). Class, Status, and Party: The Changing Face of Political Islam in Turkey and Egypt. Comparative Political Studies, 30, 1–27.Google Scholar
  40. Gunes, C. (2012). The Kurdish National Movement in Turkey: From Protest to Resistance. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Güney, A. (2002). The People’s Democracy Party. Turkish Studies, 3(1), 122–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gunter, M. M. (2009). The A to Z of the Kurds. Plymouth: Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar
  43. Hale, W. (2005). Christian Democracy and the AKP: Parallels and Contrasts. Turkish Studies, 6(2), 293–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. History of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. (1939). History of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, [online]. Available at: http://www.marx2mao.com/PDFs/HCPSU39.pdf. Accessed 29 Apr 2018.
  45. Insel, A. (2003). The AKP and Normalizing Democracy in Turkey. The South Atlantic Quarterly, 102(2), 293–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kadioglu, A. (1996). The Paradox of Turkish Nationalism and the Construction of Official Identity. Middle Eastern Studies, 32(2), 177–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kahraman, H. (2008). Türk Siyasetinin Yapısal Analizi-I Kavramlar Kuramlar Kurumlar (Structural Analysis of Turkish Politics-I Concepts Theories Institutions). İstanbul: Agora Kitaplığı.Google Scholar
  48. Karasipahi, S. (2009). Comparing Islamic Resurgence Movements in Turkey and Iran. Middle East Journal, 63(1), 87–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kaynar, M. K., Özsel, D., Çavdar, O., Altaylı, E., Mutluay, B., Ateş, S., & Sadioğlu, U. (2007). Cumhuriyet Dönemi Siyasi Partileri (Political Parties of the Republican Era). İstanbul: İmge Kitabevi Yayınları.Google Scholar
  50. Kongar, E. (2011). 21.Yüzyılda Türkiye 2000’li Yıllarda Türkiye’nin Toplumsal Yapısı (Turkey at 21st Century Turkey’s Societal Structure in the 2000s). İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi.Google Scholar
  51. Kurtz, L. R. (2005). Gülen’s Paradox: Combining Commitment and Tolerance. The Muslim World, 95(3), 373–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kuru, A. (2005). Globalization and Diversification of Islamic Movements: Three Turkish Cases. Political Science Quarterly, 120(2), 253–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Landau, J. M. (1974). Radical Politics in Modern Turkey. Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
  54. Lewis, P. G. (2006). Party States and State Parties. In R. S. Katz & W. Crotty (Eds.), Handbook of Party Politics (pp. 471–483). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lipset, S. M., & Rokkan, S. (1967). Cleavage Structures, Party System, and Voter Alignments: An Introduction. In S. M. Lipset & S. Rokkan (Eds.), Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives (pp. 1–64). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  56. Mardin, Ş. (1973). Center-Periphery Relations: A Key to Turkish Politics? Daedalus, 102(1), 169–190.Google Scholar
  57. Mardin, Ş. (2007). Modern Türkiye’de Din ve Siyaset (Religion and Politics in Modern Turkey). In M. Türköne & T. Önder (Eds.), Bütün Eserleri 8 Türkiye’de Din ve Siyaset (pp. 113–143). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.Google Scholar
  58. Margulies, R., & Yildizoglu, E. (1984, January–February). Trade Unions and Turkey’s Working Class. MERIP Reports, (121), 15–31.Google Scholar
  59. Markus, G. G. (1998). Party Politics, Party System and the Dynamics of Political Cleavages in Hungary. [pdf] NATO Final Report to NATIP on the Research Project. Available at: http://www.nato.int/acad/fellow/96-98/markus.pdf. Accessed 20 Oct 2018.
  60. Mehmet, O. (1998). Islamic Identity and Development. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  61. Mello, B. (2007). Political Process and the Development of Labor Insurgency in Turkey, 1945–80. Social Movement Studies, 6(3), 207–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Mert, N. (2007). Merkez Sağın Kısa Tarihi (Short History of Centre-Right). İstanbul: Selis Yayınları.Google Scholar
  63. Migdal, J. S. (2001). State in Society: Studying How States and Societies Transform and Constitute One Another. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Mooney, K., Knox, D., & Schacht, C. (2007). Understanding Social Problems. Belmont: Thompson/Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  65. Nişanyan, S. (2011). Hayali Coğrafyalar Cumhuriyet Döneminde Değişen Yeradları. [pdf] TESEV. Available at: http://tesev.org.tr/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Hayali_Cografyalar_Cumhuriyet_Doneminde_Degisen_Yeradlari.pdf. Accessed 29 Apr 2018.
  66. Olson, R. (1989). The Emergence of Kurdish Nationalism and the Sheikh Said Rebellion, 1880–1925. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  67. Öniş, Z. (1997). The Political Economy of Islamic Resurgence in Turkey: The Rise of the Welfare Party in Perspective. Third World Quarterly, 18, 743–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Öniş, Z. (2004). Turgut Özal and His Economic Legacy: Turkish Neo-Liberalism in Critical Perspective. Middle Eastern Studies, 40(4), 113–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Öniş, Z. (2006). Globalisation and Party Transformation Turkey’s Justice and Development Party in Perspective. In P. Burnell (Ed.), Globalising Democracy: Party Politics in Emerging Democracies (pp. 122–140). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  70. Öniş, Z. (2010). Adalet Kalkınma Parti’sinin Ekonomi-Politiği (Political Economy of the AKP). In H. Yavuz (Ed.), AK Parti Toplumsal Değişimin Yeni Aktörleri (AKP New Actors of Social Change) (pp. 259–287). İstanbul: Kitap Yayınevi.Google Scholar
  71. Özaslan, M. (2005). Recent Local Developments Models in Turkey. Turkish Policy Quarterly, 4(3), 121–139, [online]. Available at: http://www.turkishpolicy.com/images/stories/2005-03-TREUrelations/TPQ2005-3-ozaslan.pdf. Accessed 29 Apr 2018.
  72. Özbudun, E. (2000). Contemporary Turkish Politics: Challenges to Democratic Consolidation. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
  73. Özoğlu, H. (2009). Exaggerating and Exploiting the Sheikh Said Rebellion of 1925 for Political Gains. New Perspectives on Turkey, 41, 181–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Pamuk, Ş. (2009). Osmanlıdan Cumhuriyete Küreselleşme, İktisat Politikaları ve Büyüme (From Ottoman Empire to Republic Globalization, Economic Policies and Growth). İstanbul: İşbankası Kültür Yayınları.Google Scholar
  75. Parla, T., & Davison, A. (2004). Corporatist Ideology in Kemalist Turkey Progress or Order? New York: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
  76. Parsons, T. (1991). The Social System. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  77. Parties and Elections in Europe. (2012). Parties and Elections in Europe, [online]. Available at: http://www.parties-and-elections.eu/. Accessed 20 Oct 2018.
  78. Rabasa, A., & Larrabee, F. S. (2008). The Rise of Political Islam in Turkey. [pdf] RAND Corporation. Available at: http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monographs/2008/RAND_MG726.pdf. Accessed 20 Oct 2018.
  79. Robins, P. (1993). The Overlord State: Turkish Policy and the Kurdish Issue. International Affairs, 69(4), 657–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Sayarı, S. (2002). The Changing Party System. In S. Sayarı & Y. Esmer (Eds.), Politics, Parties, and Elections in Turkey (pp. 1–32). London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
  81. Sayarı, S. (2007). Towards a New Turkish Party System. Turkish Studies, 8(2), 197–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Sever, A. (1997). Soğuk Savaş Kuşatmasında Türkiye, Batı ve Ortadoğu: 1945–1958 (During the Cold War, Turkey, West and Middle East: 1945–1958). İstanbul: Boyut Kitapları.Google Scholar
  83. Sezgin, İ. G. (2013). How Islamist Parties Emerge: The Case of the National Order Party. In E. Massicard & N. F. Watts (Eds.), Negotiating Political Power in Turkey Breaking up the Party (pp. 77–99). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  84. Shankland, D. (1999). Islam and Society in Turkey. Huntingdon: Eothen Press.Google Scholar
  85. Shils, E. (1961). Centre and Periphery. In The Logic of Personal Knowledge: Essays Presented to Michael Polanyi on His Seventieth Birthday (pp. 117–130). Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
  86. Shils, E. (1975). Centre and Periphery: Essays in Macrosociology. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  87. Sönmez, M. (2015, February 9). Too Many Payroll Workers Too Few Trade Unions in Turkey. Hürriyet Daily News, [online]. Available at: http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/too-many-payroll-workers-too-few-trade-unions-in-turkey-78072. Accessed 20 Oct 2018.
  88. Stepan, A. (2000). Religion, Democracy, and the “Twin Tolerations”. Journal of Democracy, 11, 37–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Sunar, İ. (2004). Populism and Patronage: The Demokrat Party and Its Legacy in Turkey. In İ. Sunar (Ed.), State, Society and Democracy in Turkey (pp. 122–131). İstanbul: Bahçeşehir University Publication.Google Scholar
  90. Sunar, İ., & Toprak, B. (1983). Islam in Politics: The Case of Turkey. Government and Opposition, 18, 421–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Szyliowich, J. S. (1994). Education and Political Development. In M. Heper & A. Evin (Eds.), Politics in the Third Turkish Republic (pp. 147–161). Boulder/Oxford: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  92. T.C. Resmi Gazete. (1982). Number 17849, [online]. Available at: http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/arsiv/17849.pdf. Accessed 29 Apr 2018.
  93. Tanıyıcı, S. (2003). Transformation of Political Islam in Turkey Islamist Welfare Party. Party Politics, 9(4), 463–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Tanör, B., Boratav, K., Akşin, S., & Ödekan, A. (2011). Türkiye Tarihi 5 Bugünkü Türkiye 1980–2003 (History of Turkey 5 Current History 1980–2003). İstanbul: Cem Yayınevi.Google Scholar
  95. Teazis, C. (2011). İkincilerin Cumhuriyeti (Second Republicanists). İstanbul: Mızrak Yayınları.Google Scholar
  96. Tribe, K. (2007). Talcott Parsons as Translator of Max Weber’s Basis Sociological Categories. History of European Ideas, 33, 212–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Turner, J. H. (1991). The Structure of Sociological Theory. Belmont: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  98. Uslaner, E. M. (2006). Political Parties and Social Capital, Political Parties or Social Capital. In R. S. Katz & W. Crotty (Eds.), Handbook of Party Politics (pp. 376–387). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Uzgel, İ. (2009). AKP: Neoliberal Dönüşümün Yeni Aktörü (AKP: Neoliberal Transformation’s New Actor). In İ. Uzgel & B. Duru (Eds.), AKP Kitabı: Bir Dönüşümün Bilançosu (A Book on the AKP: The Balance Sheet of a Transformation) (pp. 11–40). Ankara: Phoenixkitap.Google Scholar
  100. Voll, J. O. (1999). Renewal and Reformation in the Mid-Twentieth Century: Bediuzzaman Said Nursi and Religion in the 1950s. The Muslim World, 89(3–4), 245–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Ware, A. (1996). Political Parties and Party Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  102. Watts, N. (1999). Allies and Enemies: Pro-Kurdish Parties in Turkish Politics, 1990–94. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 31(4), 631–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Watts, N. (2010). Activists in Office: Kurdish Politics and Protest in Turkey. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  104. White, J. B. (2002). Islamist Mobilization in Turkey: A Study in Vernacular Politics. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  105. Yavuz, M. H. (1997). Political Islam and the Welfare (Refah) Party in Turkey. Comparative Politics, 30(1), 63–82.Google Scholar
  106. Yavuz, M. H. (2003). Islamic Political Identity in Turkey. Oxford: Oxford University Press. English Version.Google Scholar
  107. Yavuz, H. (2005). Modernleşen Müslümanlar Nurcular, Nakşiler, Milli Görüş ve AK Parti. İstanbul: Kitap Yayınevi. Turkish Version.Google Scholar
  108. Yavuz, M. H., & Özcan, N. A. (2007). Crisis in Turkey: The Conflict of Political Languages. Middle East Policy, 14(3), 118–135.Google Scholar
  109. Yenal, O. (2010). Cumhuriyet’in İktisat Tarihi (Economic History of the Republic). İstanbul: İşbankası Kültür Yayınları.Google Scholar
  110. Yeşilada, B. (2002). The Virtue Party. In B. Rubin & M. Heper (Eds.), Political Parties in Turkey (pp. 61–82). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  111. Yeşilada, B. A. (2010). The Virtue Party. Turkish Studies, 3(1), 62–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Yılmaz, H. (2009). Europeanisation and Its Discontents: Turkey, 1959–2007. In C. Arvanitopoulos (Ed.), Turkey’s Accession to the European Union (pp. 53–64). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Yılmaz, H. (2013). Becoming Turkish: Nationalist Reforms and Cultural Negotiations in Early Republican Turkey, 1923–1945. New York: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
  114. Zürcher, E. J. (2003). Terakkiperver Cumhuriyet Fırkası (1924–1925) (Progressive Republican Party (1924–1925)). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.Google Scholar
  115. Zürcher, E. J. (2008). Modernleşen Türkiye Tarihi (History of Modernizing Turkey). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sevinç Bermek
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Middle Eastern StudiesKing’s College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations