Advertisement

Authentic Human Relations and the Economy

  • Imre Ungvári Zrínyi
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Sustainable Business In Association with Future Earth book series (PSSBAFE)

Abstract

The paper presents some of the challenges facing contemporary Western societies and highlights their origin in capitalism’s unsound self-interpretation—as found in the most familiar modern social imaginaries. In reaction to the uncontested familiarity of these modern social imaginaries, the paper explores an alternative view of human relations in Buber’s philosophy of dialogue with the resumption of some of his ideas in contemporary theories about the sources and meaning of economic and social cooperation. The works referred to are Tomáš Sedláček’s The Economics of Good and Evil and Jeremy Rifkin’s The Empathic Civilization. Rifkin considers empathy the ability of human beings to show solidarity—not only with each other, but also towards their fellow creatures who they share both the planet and the attribute of mortality with. In this conception, humans have gone from empathy in blood ties, to empathy in religious associational ties, to empathy based on national identification. The emergence of an empathic civilization seems to be a consequence of an existential similarity of finite beings, combined with the possibilities brought on by the third industrial revolution. But if we search for the origin of the idea, we could also find it in other sources—among them the religious (chassidic) spirituality of Buber’s dialogic philosophy.

References

  1. Buber, M. (1937). I and Thou (R. G. Smith, trans.). Edinburgh: T&T Clark.Google Scholar
  2. Fischer, M. (2009). Capitalist Realism: Is There No Alternative? Winchester, UK and Washington, DC: Zero Books.Google Scholar
  3. Foucault, M. (1982). The Subject and the Power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4) (Summer), 777–795.Google Scholar
  4. Gefter, A. (2010). Jeremy Rifkin: The Third Industrial Revolution. CultureLab. A science news blog – NewScientist February 17, 2010. https://web.archive.org/web/20100221092240/newscientist.com/blogs/culturelab/2010/02/jeremy-rifkin-the-third-industrial-revolution.php.
  5. Hirsch, F. (1976). Social Limits to Growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Jian Lee, D. (2014, October 20). 6 Tips for Better Work-Life Balance. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/deborahlee/2014/10/20/6-tips-for-better-work-life-balance/#56274d8929ff.
  7. Polanyi, K. (2001). The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  8. Prugh, T. (2015). Childhood’s End. In L. Mastny (Ed.), State of the World 2015: Confronting Hidden Threats to Sustainability (pp. 129–140). Washington, Covelo, and London: Island Press.Google Scholar
  9. Ram, U. (2015, June 25). Why Are the Teachings of a One-Time Radical Leftist Enjoying a Resurgence in Israel? Could the Legacy of the Almost-Forgotten Philosopher Martin Buber Rescue Civil Democracy in Israel? Haaretz. http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-1.663086.
  10. Rifkin, J. (2009). The Empathic Civilization: The Race to Global Consciousness in a World in Crisis. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  11. Schimak, U., & Volkmann, U. (2012). The Marketization of Society. Economizing the Non-economic. Welfare Societies Conference Paper, Universität Bremen.Google Scholar
  12. Sedlácek, T. (2011). Economics of Good and Evil: The Quest for Economic Meaning from Gilgamesh to Wall Street. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Sedlácek, T. (2016, February 18). We Are Moving Towards a Global Form of Organization. Veronika Pehe Interviews Economist Tomáš Sedláček. Political Critique. http://politicalcritique.org/world/2016/sedlacek-we-are-moving-towards-a-global-form-of-organization/.
  14. Senge, P., & Krahnke, K. (2014). Transcendent Empathy: The Ability to See the Larger System. In K. Pavlovich & K. Krahnke (Eds.), Organizing Through Empathy (pp. 185–202). New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Smith, R. G. (1937). Translator’s Introduction. In M. Buber (Ed.), I and Thou. Edinburgh: T&T Clark.Google Scholar
  16. Snyder, B. (2016). The Disruptables. The Hedgehog Review, 18(1) (Spring), 46–57.Google Scholar
  17. Standing, G. (2014). A Precariat Charter: From Denizens to Citizens. London, New Delhi, New York, and Sydney: Bloomsbury Academic Press.Google Scholar
  18. Taylor, C. (2004). Modern Social Imaginaries. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Theunissen, M. (1986). The Other: Studies in the Social Ontology of Husserl, Heidegger, Sartre, and Buber. Boston, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  20. Van Der Linden, H. (2003, August). Is Global Poverty a Moral Problem for Citizens of Affluent Societies? UNESCO Poverty Project “Ethical and Human Rights Dimensions of Poverty: Towards a New Paradigm in the Fight Against Poverty” Philosophy Seminar, Istanbul.Google Scholar
  21. Wesche, T. (2015, July/August). Dialectical Negativism: Michael Theunissen, 1932–2015. RP 192.Google Scholar
  22. World Health Organization. (2012). Depression: A Global Crisis. In Depression: A Global Public Health Concern. Geneva: WHO Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Imre Ungvári Zrínyi
    • 1
  1. 1.Babes-Bolyai UniversityCluj-NapocaRomania

Personalised recommendations